A cure for worry? Kierkegaardian faith and the insecurity of human existence
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In his discourses on ‘the lily of the field and the bird of the air,’ Kierkegaard presents faith as the best possible response to our precarious and uncertain condition, and as the ideal way to cope with the insecurities and concerns that his readers will recognize as common features of human existence. Reading these discourses together, we are introduced to the portrait of a potential believer who, like the ‘divinely appointed teachers’—the lily and the bird—succeeds in leading a life that is full of care, but free of worry. Such a portrait, we claim, echoes Kierkegaard’s portrait of the knight of faith in Fear and Trembling. In this essay we suggest that faith, as characterized in the ‘lily and bird’ discourses, is a kind of existential trust that would allow us to overcome worry, while remaining wholeheartedly engaged in the finite realm of our cares and concerns. We claim that Kierkegaard’s goal in these discourses is not to belittle our earthly cares, but to invite us to develop a modified attitude toward all that we are susceptible to worry about.
- Adams, R. M. (1990). The knight of faith. Faith and Philosophy, 7, 392–393.
- Beabout G. R. (2006) The silent lily and bird as exemplars of the virtue of active receptivity. In: Perkins R. (eds) International Kierkegaard commentary: Without authority. Mercer University Press, Macon, GA, pp 127–146
- Ferreira M. J. (2001) Love’s grateful striving. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, p 105 CrossRef
- Furtak R. A. (2005) Wisdom in love: Kierkegaard and the ancient quest for emotional integrity. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN
- Gordon R. M. (1987) The structure of emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 68–70
- Hall R. L. (2000) The human embrace. Penn State Press, University Park, TX, pp 78–79
- Kierkegaard, S. (1985). Philosophical fragments and Johannes Climacus (Howard & E. Hong, Trans., pp. 171–172). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Kierkegaard, S. (1988). Stages on life’s way (Howard & E. Hong, Trans., p. 236). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Kierkegaard, S. (1990). Eighteen upbuilding discourses (Howard & E. Hong, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Kierkegaard, S. (1993). Upbuilding discourses in various spirits (Howard & E. Hong, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (1993).
- Kierkegaard, S. (2009). Concluding unscientific postscript (A. Hannay, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
- Krishek S. (2009) Kierkegaard on faith and love. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA CrossRef
- Malantschuk, G. (2003). Kierkegaard’s concept of existence (Howard & E. Hong, Trans., p. 126). Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
- Mooney E. (2007) On Søren Kierkegaard. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 236–237
- Nussbaum M. C. (1986) The fragility of goodness. Cambridge Univerisy Press, Cambridge, MA
- Pattison, G. (2010). A note on the translation. In S. Kierkegaard, Spiritual writings (G. Pattison, Trans., pp. xxxi–xxxii). New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
- Possen D. (2005) Faith’s freedom from care. In: Perkins R. (eds) International Kierkegaard commentary: Upbuilding discourses in various spirits. Mercer University Press, Macon, GA, pp 153–172
- Stokes P. (2007) Kierkegaard’s mirrors. Inquiry 50: 71 CrossRef
- Vogel L. (1994) The fragile ‘We’. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL
- A cure for worry? Kierkegaardian faith and the insecurity of human existence
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Volume 72, Issue 3 , pp 157-175
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links