Housing and labor decisions of households
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
In this paper, we analyze the relationship between the demand for housing and the family employment. To do so, we develop an economic model and use a sample of Spanish households to analyze the housing tenure choice (ownership or rental of the house) and the demand for housing in relation to family labor decisions. We have gone beyond previous studies by incorporating the discrete decisions of tenure choice and the participation of women in the labor market, proving that these decisions are interrelated and broadening the scope of our findings and conclusions. We obtained an important description of the effect of economic factors on housing and labor decisions and demonstrated that a change in a family’s employment decisions affects housing decisions and vice versa. In addition, we determined to what extent housing and labor decisions are affected by changes in the wife’s educational level and changes in family composition. Our findings show that the labor decisions have more sensitivity than housing decisions to these changes.
- Assadian, A., & Ondrich, J. (1993). Residential location, housing demand and labor supply decisions of one- and two-earner households: The case of Bogota, Colombia. Urban Studies, 30, 73–86. CrossRef
- Barrios, J. A., & Rodríguez, J. E. (2007). Housing and urban location decisions in Spain: An econometric analysis with unobserved heterogenity. Urban Studies, 44, 1657–1676. CrossRef
- Blundell, R., & Walker, I. (1986). A life-cycle consistent empirical model of family labor supply using cross-section data. Review of Economic Studies, 53, 539–558. CrossRef
- Börsch-Supan, A., & Pitkin, J. (1988). On discrete choice models of housing demand. Journal of Urban Economics, 24, 153–172. CrossRef
- Browning, M., & Meghir, C. (1991). The effects of male and female labor supply on commodity demands. Econometrica, 59, 925–951. CrossRef
- Chiappori, P. A. (2011). Collective labor supply with many consumption goods. Review of Economics of the Household, 9, 207–220. CrossRef
- Christofides, L. N., Stengos, T., & Swidinsky, R. (1997). On the calculation of marginal effects in the bivariate probit model. Economic Letters, 54, 203–208. CrossRef
- Deutsch, E., Neuwirth, N., & Yurdakul, A. (2001). Housing and labor supply. Journal of Housing Economics, 10, 335–362. CrossRef
- Duguet, E., & Simonnet, V. (2007). Labor market participation in France: An asymptotic least squares analysis of couples’ decisions. Review of Economics of the Household, 5, 159–179. CrossRef
- Edin, P. A., & Englund, P. (1991). Moving costs and housing demand. Are recent movers really in equilibrium? Journal of Public Economics, 44, 299–320. CrossRef
- Ermisch, J. F., Findlay, J., & Gibb, K. (1996). The price elasticity of housing demand in Britain: Issues of sample selection. Journal of Housing Economics, 5, 64–86. CrossRef
- Fernández-Val, I. (2003). Household labor supply: Evidence for Spain. Investigaciones Económicas, 27, 239–275.
- Fortin, N. M. (1995). Allocation inflexibilities, female labor supply, and housing assets accumulation: Are women working to pay the mortgage? Journal of Labor Economics, 13, 524–557. CrossRef
- Goodman, A. C. (1988). An econometric model of housing price, permanent income, tenure choice, and housing demand. Journal of Urban Economics, 23, 327–353. CrossRef
- Goodman, A. C. (2002). Estimating equilibrium housing demand for ‘stayers’. Journal of Urban Economics, 51, 1–24. CrossRef
- Greene, W. H. (1996). Marginal effects in the bivariate probit model. New York University, Working Paper, EC-96-11.
- Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric Analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Grossbard-Shechtman, A. (1984). A theory of allocation of time in markets for labour and marriage. The Economic Journal, 94, 863–882. CrossRef
- Gyourko, J., & Linneman, P. (1996). Analysis of the changing influences on traditional households’ ownership patterns. Journal of Urban Economics, 39, 318–341. CrossRef
- Haurin, D. R., Hendershott, P. H., & Kim, D. (1994). Housing decisions of American youth. Journal of Urban Economics, 35, 28–45. CrossRef
- Hausman, J., & Ruud, P. (1984). Family labor supply with taxes. The American Economic Review, 74, 242–248.
- Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–162. CrossRef
- Henderson, J. V., & Ioannides, Y. M. (1986). Tenure choice and the demand for housing. Economica, 53, 231–246. CrossRef
- Henley, A. (1998). Residential mobility, housing equity and the labor market. The Economic Journal, 108, 414–427. CrossRef
- Kohlhase, J. E. (1986). Labor supply and housing demand for one- and two-earner households. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 48–57. CrossRef
- Lee, L.-F., & Trost, R. P. (1978). Estimation of some limited dependent variable models with application to housing demand. Journal of Econometrics, 8, 357–382. CrossRef
- Linneman, P. (1980). Some empirical results on the nature on hedonic prices function for the urban housing market. Journal of Urban Economics, 8, 47–68. CrossRef
- Rapaport, C. (1997). Housing demand and community choice: An empirical analysis. Journal of Urban Economics, 42, 243–260. CrossRef
- Sonstelie, J. C., & Portney, P. R. (1980). Gross rents and market values: Testing the implications of Tiebout’s hypothesis. Journal of Urban Economics, 7, 102–118. CrossRef
- Tu, Y., & Goldfinch, J. (1996). A two-stage housing choice forecasting model. Urban Studies, 33, 517–537. CrossRef
- Housing and labor decisions of households
Review of Economics of the Household
Volume 11, Issue 1 , pp 55-82
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Housing tenure
- Housing demand
- Family labor supply
- Female participation in the labor market
- Industry Sectors