Separability between own food production and consumption in Turkey
- Hasan Tekgüç
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Complete markets imply the separation of food production and consumption decisions such that they can be modeled to occur sequentially and can be studied independently. Separation is very often assumed implicitly in empirical studies of food demand. If there is such separation, then food sourced within the household should not have any influence upon the budget share of each food group. Using this insight, this paper first develops a procedure to test for the separation of household food production and consumption decisions. Furthermore, it incorporates the testing procedure into the Almost Ideal Demand Systems model and utilizes survey data from 2003 for Turkey for empirical testing. It concludes that the separation assumption is unwarranted for Turkey. Next, it investigates the extent of bias in elasticity estimates when the separation assumption is unwarranted. It concludes that ignoring the nonseparation of consumption and production decisions in rural areas leads to significant overestimation of food expenditure elasticity for dairy products and eggs and own-price elasticity for bread and cereals.
- Akbay, C., Boz, I., & Chern, W. S. (2007). Household food consumption in Turkey. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 34(2), 209. CrossRef
- Akbay, C., Boz, I., & Chern, W. S. (2008). Household food consumption in Turkey: A reply. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 35(1), 99–102. CrossRef
- Armagan, G., & Akbay, C. (2008). An econometric analysis of urban households’ animal products consumption in Turkey. Applied Economics, 40(15), 2025–2032. CrossRef
- Banks, J., Blundell, R., & Lewbel, A. (1997). Quadratic Engel curves and consumer demand. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 527–539. CrossRef
- Benjamin, D. (1992). Household composition, labor markets, and labor demand: Testing for separation in agricultural household models. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 60(2), 287–322. CrossRef
- Davidova, S., Fredriksson, L., & Bailey, A. (2009). Subsistence and semi-subsistence farming in selected EU new member states. Agricultural Economics, 40, 733–744. CrossRef
- de Janvry, A., Fafchamps, M., & Sadoulet, E. (1991). Peasant household behavior with missing markets: Some paradoxes explained. The Economic Journal, 101(409), 1400–1417. CrossRef
- Deaton, A., & Muellbauer, J. (1980). An almost ideal demand system. The American Economic Review, 70(3), 312–326.
- Drichoutis, A. C., Klonaris, S., Lazaridis, P., & Nayga, R. M., Jr. (2008). Household food consumption in Turkey: A comment. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 35(1), 93. CrossRef
- FAO. (2001). Nutrition country profile of Turkey. Rome: Food and Nutrition Division.
- Heien, D., & Wessells, C. R. (1990). Demand systems estimation with microdata: A censored regression approach. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 8(3), 365–371.
- Hoddinott, J., & Haddad, L. (1995). Does female income share influence household expenditures? Evidence from Côte d’Ivoire. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57(1), 77–96. CrossRef
- Key, N., Sadoulet, E., & de Janvry, A. (2000). Transactions costs and agricultural household supply response. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(2), 245–259. CrossRef
- OIK. (2006). Hayvancilik ozel ihtisas komisyonu raporu/special report for animal husbandry sector for the 9th development plan. Ankara: D. P. Teşkilatı.
- Pekcan, G., & Karaağaoğlu, N. (2000). State of nutrition in Turkey. Nutrition and Health, 14, 41–52. CrossRef
- Pollak, R. A., & Wales, T. J. (1981). Demographic variables in demand analysis. Econometrica, 49(6), 1533–1551. CrossRef
- Sadoulet, E., & De Janvry, A. (1995). Quantitative development policy analysis. Baltimore: Hopkins Univ. Press.
- Sengul, S., & Tuncer, I. (2005). Poverty levels and food demand of the poor in Turkey. Agribusiness, 21(3), 289–311; 289.
- Shonkwiler, J. S., & Yen, S. T. (1999). Two-step estimation of a censored system of equations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(4), 972. CrossRef
- SIS. (1994). Household budget survey 1994. Ankara: State Institute of Statistics, Prime Ministry Republic of Turkey.
- SIS. (2003). Household budget survey 2003. Ankara: State Institute of Statistics, Prime Ministry Republic of Turkey.
- Tauchmann, H. (2005). Efficiency of two-step estimators for censored systems of equations: Shonkwiler and Yen reconsidered. Applied Economics, 37(4), 367–374. CrossRef
- Taylor, J. E., & Adelman, I. (2003). Agricultural household models: Genesis, evolution, and extensions. Review of Economics of the Household, 1(1), 33–58. CrossRef
- Tekguc, H. (2010). Elasticity estimates in the presence of self-produced food consumption. Mardin Artuklu University Working Paper Series: http://www.iktisat.artuklu.edu.tr/img/genel/tekguc_ownproduced_2.pdf.
- Yen, S. T., Kan, K., & Su, S. J. (2002). Household demand for fats and oils: Two-step estimation of a censored demand system. Applied Economics, 34(14), 1799–1806. CrossRef
- Separability between own food production and consumption in Turkey
Review of Economics of the Household
Volume 10, Issue 3 , pp 423-439
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Agricultural household models
- Own-produced food consumption
- Elasticity estimates
- Dairy products
- Industry Sectors
- Hasan Tekgüç (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Economics Department, Mardin Artuklu Univeristy, Yenisehir Yerleskesi, Diyarbakir Yolu, Mardin, Turkey