Skip to main content
Log in

Founders versus non-founders in large companies: financial incentives and the call for regulation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is intended to question some of the premises in the ever increasing calls to regulate executive pay. We focus on founders, and extend Shleifer and Vishny’s (1989, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461–488) manager-specific investments model by explicitly modeling managerial effort and pay performance sensitivity. Tests of this model on a data set of large companies, controlling for the endogeneity of managerial compensation, indicate that founders tend to be less responsive to performance incentives and generally more entrenched. At the same time, founders’ led firms are more valuable, supporting our predictions. This suggests that for founders, regulation of compensation may not be very effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, Renée B., Almeida, Heitor, & Ferreira, Daniel (2003). Understanding the relationship between founder-CEOs and firm performance. Working Paper: New York University.

  • Agarwal Anup, Mandelker Gershon N. (1987). Managerial incentives and corporate investment and financing decisions. Journal of Finance 42: 823–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsos Gry A., Kolvereid Lars (1998). The business gestation process of novice, serial and parallel business founders. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice 22: 101–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson Ronald C., Reeb David M. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance 58: 1301–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro Jason R., Barro Robert J. (1990). Pay performance and turnover of bank CEOs. Journal of Labor Economics 8: 448–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk Lucian A., Fried Jesse M. (2004). Pay without performance. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begley Thomas (1995). Using founder status, age of the firm, and company growth rate as the basis for distinguishing entrepreneurs from managers of smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing 10: 249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger Philip G., Ofek Eli, Yermack David L. (1997). Managerial Entrenchment and capital structure decisions. Journal of Finance 52: 1411–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand Marianne, Schoar Antoinette S. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 1169–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black Fischer, Scholes Myron M. (1973). The Pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81: 637–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus Robert H., Horwitz Pamela S. (1986). The psychology of the entrepreneur. In: Sexton Donald L., Smilor Raymond W. (eds) The art and science of entrepreneurship. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkart Mike., Panunzi Fausto, Shleifer Andrei (2003). Family firm. Journal of Finance 58: 2167–2202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carland James W., Hoy Frank, Boulton William R., Carland Jo Ann C. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review 9: 354–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll Thomas M., Ciscel David H. (1982). The effects of regulation on executive compensation. Review of Economics and Statistics 64(August): 505–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier Judith, Ellison Glenn (1999). Are some mutual fund managers better than others? Cross-sectional patterns in behavior and performance. Journal of Finance 54: 875–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, Jeffrey L., Meschke, Felix, & Lemmon, Michael L. (2003). Structural models and endogeneity in corporate finance: The link between managerial ownership and corporate performance. Working Paper. Tempe: Arizona State University.

  • Core John E., Guay Wayne R. (1999). The use of equity grants to manage optimal equity incentive levels. Journal of Accounting and Economics 28: 151–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defusco Richard A., Johnson Robert R., Zorn Thomas S. (1990). The effect of executive stock option plans on stockholders and bondholders. Journal of Finance 45: 617–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz Harold, Lehn Kenneth (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93: 1155–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edlin Aaron S., Stiglitz Joseph E. (1995). Discouraging rivals: Managerial rent-seeking and economic inefficiencies. American Economic Review 85: 1301–1312

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahlenbrach, Rüdiger (2006). Founders-CEOs, investment decisions and stock market performance. Ohio State University Working Paper.

  • Garvey Gerald T. (1997). Marketable incentive contracts and capital structure relevance. Journal of Finance 52: 353–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons Robert, Murphy Kevin J. (1992). Optimal incentive contracts in the presence of career concerns: Theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy 88: 468–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gompers Paul A., Ishii Joy, Metrick Andrew A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity price. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 107–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene William H. (1997). Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall Publishers, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Guay Wayne R. (1999). The Sensitivity of ceo wealth to equity risk: An analysis of the magnitude and determinants. Journal of Financial Economics 53: 43–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati Damodar N. (2003). Basic econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell Jay C., Starks Laura T. (2003). Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation. Journal of Finance 54: 2351–2374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin Benjamin E., Weisbach Michael S. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management 20: 101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelberg Charles P., Hubbard Glenn R., Palia Darius (1999). Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the links between ownership and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 53: 353–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holderness Clifford G., Kroszner Randall S., Sheehan Dennis P. (1999). Were the good old days that good? Evolution of managerial stock ownership and corporate governance since the great depression. Journal of Finance 54: 353–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom Bengt (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 74–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom Bengt (1982). Moral hazard in teams. Bell Journal of Economics 13: 324–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom Bengt (1999). Managerial incentive problems: A dynamic perspective. Review of Economic Studies 66: 169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston Joel F., James Christopher M. (1995). CEO compensation and bank risk: Is compensation in banking structured to promote risk taking? Journal of Monetary Economics 36: 405–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard Glenn R., Palia Darius (1995). Executive pay and performance: Evidence from the U.S. Banking industry. Journal of Financial Economics 39: 105–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen Michael C., Murphy Kevin J. (1990b). Performance pay and top-management incentives. The Journal of Political Economy 98: 225–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson W. Bruce, Magee Robert P., Nagarajan Nandu J., Newman Harry A. (1985). An analysis of the stock price reaction to sudden executive deaths: Implications for the managerial labor market. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7: 151–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joskow Paul L., Rose Nancy L., Shepard Andrea (1993). Regulatory constraints on ceo compensation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics 1: 1–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Moshe, Maksimovic Vojislav (1990). Debt and input misallocation. Journal of Finance 45: 795–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kole Stacey R. (1995). Measuring managerial equity ownership: A comparison of sources of ownership data. Journal of Corporate Finance 1: 413–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loderer Claudio F., Martin Kenneth (1997). Executive stock options and performance tracking faint traces. Journal of Financial Economics 45: 223–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell John J., Servaes Henri (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27: 595–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra Chandra S., McConaughy Daniel L. (1999). Founding family control and capital structure: The risk of loss of control and aversion to debt. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice 23: 53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck Randall K., Shleifer Andrei, Vishny Robert W. (1988a). Characteristics of targets of hostile and friendly takeovers. In: Auerbach A.J. (eds) Corporate takeovers: Causes and consequences. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck Randall K., Shleifer Andrei, Vishny Robert W. (1988b). Management ownership and market valuation. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, Randall K., Strangeland, David A., & Yeung, Bernard (1998). Inherited wealth corporate control and economic growth: The Canadian disease? NBER Working Paper 6814.

  • Murphy Kevin J. (1985). Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting Economics 7: 11–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy Kevin J. (1986). Incentives, learning, and compensation: A theoretical and empirical investigation of managerial labor contracts. Rand Journal of Economics 17: 59–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palia Darius (2001). The endogeniety of managerial compensation in firm valuation: A solution. Review of Financial Studies 14: 735–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palia Darius (2000). The impact of regulation on CEO labor markets. RAND Journal of Economics 31: 165–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palia Darius, Lichtenberg Frank (1999). Managerial ownership and firm performance: A re-examination using productivity measurement. Journal of Corporate Finance 5: 323–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Gonzalez Francisco (2001). Does inherited control hurt firm performance? Working Paper. New York: Columbia University

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry Tod, Zenner Marc (2001). Pay for performance? Government regulation and the structure of compensation contracts. Journal of Financial Economics 62: 453–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajgopal Shivaram, Shevlin Terry (2002). Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33: 145–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, Philip L., & Stewart, Wayne H. (2000). Risk taking propensity as a distinctive entrepreneurial characteristic: A meta-analytic review. Mimeo. Clemson: Clemson University.

  • Rubenson George C., Gupta Anil K. (1996). A contingency model of founder tenure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 21: 21–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyun-Han Shin, Stulz René M. (1998). Are internal capital markets efficient?. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 531–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer Andrei, Vishny Robert W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 94: 461–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer Andrei, Vishny Robert W. (1989). Management entrenchment: The case of manager-specific investments. Journal of Financial Economics 25: 123–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith Clifford W., Watts Ross L. (1992). The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics 32: 263–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Nicholas (2001). The age of the scion. Fortune (April): 121–128.

  • Villalonga Belen, Amit Raphael (2004). How do family ownership, management, and control affect firm value Working Paper. Cambridge: Harvard Business School

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge Jeffrey M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Yermack David (1995). Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively? Journal of Financial Economics 39: 237–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Xianming (2001). Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link Between Ownership and Performance: Comment. Journal of Financial Economics 25: 2015–2040

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darius Palia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palia, D., Ravid, S.A. & Wang, CJ. Founders versus non-founders in large companies: financial incentives and the call for regulation. J Regul Econ 33, 55–86 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-007-9042-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-007-9042-z

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation