Inclusionary Housing Policies, Stigma Effects and Strategic Production Decisions
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Inclusionary housing policies enacted by municipal governments rely on a combination of legal mandates and economic incentives to encourage residential real estate developers to include affordable units in otherwise market-rate projects. These regulations provide a means of stimulating the production of mixed-income housing at a minimal cost to the public sector, but have been hypothesized to slow development and put upward pressure on housing prices. The results of the theoretical models presented in this paper suggest that inclusionary housing policies need not increase housing prices in all situations. However, any observed impact on housing prices may be mitigated by density effects and stigma effects that decrease demand for market-rate units. The results additionally suggest real estate developers are likely to respond to inclusionary housing policies by strategically altering production decisions.
- Anderson, S. T., & West, S. E. (2006). Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36, 773–789. CrossRef
- Bento, A., Lowe, S., Knapp, G. J., & Chakraborty, A. (2009). Housing market effects of inclusionary zoning. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 11(2), 7–26.
- Brunick, N. (2004a). The inclusionary housing debate: the effectiveness of mandatory programs over voluntary programs. Zoning Practice, American Planning Association, 9.04, 2–7.
- Brunick, N. (2004b). Inclusionary zoning: proven success in large cities. Zoning Practice, American Planning Association, 10.04, 2–13.
- Bulan, L., Mayer, C., & Somerville, C. T. (2006). Irreversible investment, real options, and competition: evidence from real estate development. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 237–251. CrossRef
- Capozza, D. R., & Helsley, R. W. (1990). The stochastic city. Journal of Urban Economics, 28(2), 187–203. CrossRef
- Capozza, D. R., & Li, Y. (1994). The intensity and timing of investment: the case of land. The American Economic Review, 84(4), 889–904.
- Capozza, D. R., & Li, Y. (2002). Optimal land development decisions. Journal of Urban Economics, 51(1), 123–142. CrossRef
- Childs, P. D., Ott, S. H., & Riddiough, T. J. (2002). Optimal valuation of claims on noisy real assets: theory and an application. Real Estate Economics, 30, 415–444. CrossRef
- Clapp, J. M. (1981). The impact of inclusionary zoning on the location and type of construction activity. Real Estate Economics, 9(4), 436–456. CrossRef
- Clapp, J. M., Bardos, K. S., & Wong, S. K. (2012). Empirical estimation of the option premium for residential redevelopment. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(1–2), 240–256. CrossRef
- Cunningham, C. (2007). Growth controls, real options and local development. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 343–358. CrossRef
- Das, A. (2010). Can inclusionary zoning be an effective and efficient housing policy? Evidence from Los Angeles and Orange County. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(2), 229–252. CrossRef
- Ellen, I. G., Schwartz, A. E., Voicu, I., & Schill, M. H. (2006). The external effects of place-based subsidized housing. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36, 679–707. CrossRef
- Ellen, I. G., Schwartz, A. E., Voicu, I., & Schill, M. H. (2007). Does federally subsidized rental housing depress neighborhood property values? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(2), 257–280. CrossRef
- Ellickson, R. C. (1981). The irony of inclusionary zoning. Southern California Law Review, 54, 1167–1216.
- Funderburg, R., & MacDonald, H. (2010). Neighbourhood valuation effects from new construction of low-income tax credit projects in Iowa: a natural experiment. Urban Studies, 47(8), 1745–1771. CrossRef
- Geoghegan, J. (2006). The value of open spaces in residential land use. Land Use Policy, 19(1), 91–98. CrossRef
- Green, R. K., Malpezzi, S., & Mayo, S. K. (2005). Metropolitan-specific estimates of the price elasticity of supply of housing, and their sources. The American Economic Review, 95(2), 334–339. CrossRef
- Grenadier, S. R. (1996). The strategic exercise of options; Development cascades and overbuilding in real estate markets. Journal of Finance, 51(5), 1653–1679. CrossRef
- Grenadier, S. R. (1999). Information revelation through option exercise. Review of Financial Studies, 12, 95–129. CrossRef
- Joseph, M., & Chaskin, R. (2010). Living in a mixed-income development: resident perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of two developments in Chicago. Urban Studies, 47(11), 1–20. CrossRef
- Majd, S., & Pindyck, R. S. (1987). Time to build, option value, and investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics, 18, 7–27. CrossRef
- Malpezzi, S., & Maclennan, D. (2001). The long-run price elasticity of supply of new residential construction in the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Housing Economics, 10(3), 278–306. CrossRef
- Mayer, C. J., & Somerville, C. T. (2000). Land use regulations and new construction. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(6), 639–662. CrossRef
- Nirider, L. H. (2008). In search of refinement without exclusiveness: inclusionary zoning in Highland Park, Illinois. Northwestern University Law Review, 102(4), 1919–1952.
- Ott, S. H., Hughen, W. K., & Read, D. C. (2012). Optimal phasing and inventory decisions for large scale residential development projects. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 45(4), 888–918. CrossRef
- Read, D. C. (2009). The structure and potential economic effects of inclusionary zoning ordinances. Real Estate Issues, 34(2), 1–10.
- Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R., & Been, V. (2009). 31 flavors of inclusionary zoning: comparing policies from San Francisco, Washington, DC and Suburban Boston. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(4), 441–456. CrossRef
- Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R., & Been, V. (2011). Silver bullet or Trojan horse? The effects of inclusionary zoning on local housing markets in the United States. Urban Studies, 48(2), 297–329. CrossRef
- Schwartz, A., & Tajbakhsh, K. (1997). Mixed-income housing: unanswered questions. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 3(2), 71–92.
- Towe, C. A., Nickerson, C. J., & Bockstael, N. (2008). An empirical examination of the timing of land conversions in the presence of farmland preservation programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(3), 613–626. CrossRef
- Turner, M. A. (2005). Landscape preferences and patterns of residential development. Journal of Urban Economics, 57(1), 19–54. CrossRef
- Varady, D. P., Raffel, J. A., Sweeney, S., & Denson, L. (2005). Attracting middle-income families in the Hope VI public housing revitalization program. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27(2), 149–164. CrossRef
- Wang, K., & Zhou, Y. (2006). Equilibrium real options exercise strategies with multiple planers: the case of real estate markets. Real Estate Economics, 34(1), 1–49. CrossRef
- Williams, J. T. (1991). Real estate development as an option. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4, 191–208. CrossRef
- Williams, J. T. (1997). Redevelopment of real estate. Real Estate Economics, 25(3), 387–407. CrossRef
- Inclusionary Housing Policies, Stigma Effects and Strategic Production Decisions
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics
Volume 48, Issue 4 , pp 589-610
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Affordable housing
- Inclusionary zoning
- Residential development
- Mixed-income development
- Industry Sectors