Historic Preservation: Preserving Value? Authors
First Online: 06 September 2011 DOI:
Cite this article as: Heintzelman, M.D. & Altieri, J.A. J Real Estate Finan Econ (2013) 46: 543. doi:10.1007/s11146-011-9338-8 Abstract
The creation of historic districts has become a common way to preserve historic buildings and neighborhoods. Advocates of historic districts assume that such districts augment, or at least, protect property values for homes within these districts. The existing economic literature supports this conclusion, but most studies seem to fall victim to an endogeneity bias since higher value homes are, all else equal, more likely to be included in districts. This study uses repeat-sales fixed effects (difference-in-differences) analysis to look at homes before and after the creation of districts in the Boston-Cambridge-Quincy MSA between 2000 and 2007, and thus control for this endogeneity bias. Secondarily, we re-examine the effects of a Massachusetts preservation policy, the Community Preservation Act (CPA) which, in part, supports historic preservation. We find evidence that the creation of a local historic district, on average, reduces home prices for homes in that district between 11.6 and 15.5%. This indicates that any restrictions implied by the creation of a district outweigh any benefits to homeowners within the district. If, instead, census block fixed effects are employed, the analysis shows a statistically insignificant impact, the sign and magnitude of which depends on the specification. Taken together with the repeat sales result, this confirms our intuition about the importance of controlling for omitted variables and endogeneity biases. Finally, we find evidence that the CPA also lowers property values, by less than 1%, and that being in a Historic District magnifies the negative effect of the CPA.
Keywords Historic preservation Hedonic analysis Repeat sales Regulation
An erratum to this article can be found at
. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11146-011-9355-7 References
Ahlfeldt, G. M., & Maennig, W. (2010). Substitutability and complementarity of urban amenities: External effects of built heritage in berlin.
Real Estate Economics, 38
Asabere, P. K., Hachey, G., & Grubaugh, S. (1989). Architecture, historic zoning, and the value of homes.
Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2
Asabere, P. K., Huffman, F. E., & Mehdian, S. (1994). The adverse impacts of local historic designation: The case of small apartment buildings in philadelphia.
Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 8
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119
Brueckner, J. K. (1982). A test for allocative efficiency in the local public sector.
Journal of Public Economics, 19
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2010).
Microeconometrics using stata. College Station: Stata Press.
Clark, D. E., & Herrin, W. E. (1997). Historical preservation districts and home sale prices: Evidence from the sacramento housing market.
The Review of Regional Studies, 27(1), 29–48.
Coffin, D. (1989). The impact of historic districts on residential property values.
Eastern Economics Journal, 15(3), 221–228.
Coulson, N. E., & Lahr, M. L. (2005). Gracing the land of elvis and beale street: Historic designation and property values in memphis.
Real Estate Economics, 33
Coulson, N. E., & Leichenko, R. M. (2010). The internal and external impact of historical designation on property values.
Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 23
Dye, R. F., & McMillen, D. P. (2007). Teardowns and land values in the chicago metropolitan area.
Journal of Urban Economics, 61
Glaeser, E. L., & Gyourko, J. (2003). The impact of building restrictions on housing affordability.
Economic Policy Review - Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 9(2), 21–39.
Glaeser, E. L., & Ward, B. A. (2009). The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from greater boston.
Journal of Urban Economics, 65
Greenstone, M., & Gayer, T. (2009). Quasi-experiments and experimental approaches to environmental economics.
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57
Halvorsen, R., & Palmquist, R. (1980). The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations.
American Economic Review, 70(3), 474–475.
Heintzelman, M. D. (2010a). Measuring the property value effects of land-use and preservation referenda.
Land Economics, 86(1), 22–47.
Heintzelman, M. D. (2010b). The value of land use patterns and preservation policies.
The B.E. Journal of Economics Analysis and Policy (Topics), 10(1), Article 39.
Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (2007). The effect of land use regulation on housing and land prices.
Journal of Urban Economics, 61
Leichenko, R. M., Coulson, N. E., & Listokin, D. (2001). Historic preservation and residential property values: An analysis of texas cities.
Urban Studies, 38
LeSage, J. P., & Pace, R. K. (2009).
Introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapman and Hall, CRC Press.
McMillen, D. P. (2006). Teardowns: Costs, benefits, and public policy.
Land Lines, 18(3), 2–7.
Noonan, D. S. (2007). Finding an impact of preservation policies: Price effects of historic landmarks on attached homes in chicago, 1990–1999.
Economic Development Quarterly, 21
Noonan, D. S., & Krupka, D. (2010). Determinants of historic and cultural landmark designation: Why we preserve what we preserve.
Journal of Cultural Economics, 34
Noonan, D. S., & Krupka, D. J. (2011). Making- or picking-winners: Evidence of internal and external price effects in historic preservation policies.
Real Estate Economics, 39
Parmeter, C., & Pope, J. C. (2011). Quasi-experiments and hedonic property value methods. In J. A. List, & M. K. Price (Eds.),
Handbook on experimental economics and the environment. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sirmans, G. S., MacDonald, L., Macpherson, D. A., & Zietz, E. N. (2006). The value of housing characteristics: A meta analysis.
Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 33
Sirmans, G. S., Macpherson, D. A., & Zietz, E. N. (2005). The composition of hedonic pricing models.
Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13(1), 3–43.
Taylor, L. O. (2003). The hedonic method. In P. A. Champ, K. J. Boyle, & T. C. Brown (Eds.),
A primer on nonmarket valuation. The economics of non-market goods and resources, (Vol. 3). Kluwer Academic Publishers. Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011