Residential Mortgage Default: The Roles of House Price Volatility, Euphoria and the Borrower’s Put Option
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
House price volatility; lender and borrower perception of price trends, loan and property features; and the borrower’s put option are integrated in a model of residential mortgage default. These dimensions of the default problem have, to our knowledge, not previously been considered altogether within the same investigation framework. We rely on a sample of individual mortgage loans for 20 counties in Florida, over the period 2001 through 2008, third quarter, with housing price performance obtained from repeat sales analysis of individual transactions. The results from the analysis strongly confirm the significance of the borrower’s put as an operative factor in default. At the same time, the results provide convincing evidence that the experience in Florida is in part driven by lenders and purchasers exhibiting euphoric behavior such that in markets with higher price appreciation there is a willingness to accept recent prior performance as an indicator of future risk. This connection illustrates a familiar moral hazard in the housing market due to the limited information about future prices.
- Abraham, J. M., & Hendershott, P. H. (1992). Bubbles in metropolitan housing markets, NBER Working Paper No. W4774.
- Ambrose, B. W., & Buttimer, R. J. (2000). Embedded options in the mortgage contract. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 21(2), 95–111. CrossRef
- Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2007). Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 129–151. CrossRef
- Capozza, D. R., & Seguin, P. J. (1996). Expectations, efficiency, and euphoria in the housing market. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, 369–386. CrossRef
- Case, K. E., & Shiller, R. J. (1988). The behavior of home buyers in boom and post-boom markets. New England Economic Review, November-December, pp 29–46.
- Demyanyk, Y., & Van Hemert, O. (2008). Understanding the subprime mortgage crisis. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
- Foote, C., Gerardi, K., & Willen, P. (2008). Negative equity and foreclosure: theory and evidence. Journal of Urban Economics, 6(2), 234–245. CrossRef
- Gerardi, K., Shapiro, A., & Willen, P. (2007). Subprime outcomes: Risky mortgages, homeownership experiences, and foreclosures. Working Paper 07−15, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
- Goetzmann, W. N., Peng, L., & Yen, J. (2009). The subprime crisis and house price appreciation. Unpublished paper.
- Maddala, G. S. (1977). Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
- Ong, S. E., Neo, P. H., & Spieler, A. C. (2006). Price premium and foreclosure risk. Real Estate Economics, 34(2), 211–242. CrossRef
- Quercia, R. G., Stegman, M. A., & Davis, W. R. (2005). The impact of predatory loan terms on subprime foreclosures: The special case of prepayment penalties and balloon payments, center for community capitalism, Kenan Institute for Private Enterprise. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, January 25.
- Shiller, R. J. (2005). Irrational exuberance (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Smith, B. C. (2009). The Subprime Mortgage Market, a Review and Compilation of Research and Commentary, forthcoming in the Journal of Housing Research.
- Residential Mortgage Default: The Roles of House Price Volatility, Euphoria and the Borrower’s Put Option
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics
Volume 46, Issue 2 , pp 355-378
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Residential mortgage default
- Housing economics
- Mortgage underwriting
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Warrington College of Business Administration Department of Finance Insurance & Real Estate, Wachovia Fellow University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- 2. Department of Finance Insurance and Real Estate, Snead School of Business, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA