Knowledge and processes that predict proficiency in digital literacy
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Proficiency in digital literacy refers to the ability to read and write using online sources, and includes the ability to select sources relevant to the task, synthesize information into a coherent message, and communicate the message with an audience. The present study examines the determinants of digital literacy proficiency by asking 150 students who had 50 min of access to the Internet and a word processor to produce a research report on whether or not their college should require all students to own a laptop computer. The resulting essay received a holistic rating from 1 to 5. Concerning knowledge underlying digital literacy, the major predictors of digital literacy proficiency (as measured by essay rating) were academic experience (undergraduate versus graduate status) and domain knowledge (based on a questionnaire), rather than technical knowledge about how to use computers (based on a questionnaire). Concerning processing during the task, the major predictors of digital literacy proficiency were integrating processes (such as number of unique sources, citations, or supporting details) rather than search processes (such as number of actions, web pages, websites, links, or search terms). In short, proficiency in digital literacy depended mainly on academic experience rather than technical experience, and on how learners organize and integrate the information they find rather than on how much information they peruse. Findings from this study suggest that the basic tenets of good scholarship apply to digital media.
- Barton, D (2001) Directions for literacy research: Analysing language and social practices in a textually mediated world. Language and Education 15: pp. 92-104 CrossRef
- Bennett, S, Maton, K, Kervin, L (2008) The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology 39: pp. 775-786 CrossRef
- Brand-Gruwel, S, Wopereis, I, Vermetten, Y (2005) Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior 21: pp. 487-508 CrossRef
- Bråten, I, Strømsø, HI, Salmerón, L (2011) Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction 21: pp. 180-192 CrossRef
- Coiro, J, Knobel, M, Lankshearm, C, Leu, DJ eds. (2008) Handbook of research on new literacies. Erlbaum, New York, NY
- Gee, JP (2003) What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
- Glister, P Digital literacy. In: Pea, R eds. (2000) The Jossey-Bass reader on technology and learning. Jossey-Bass Inc, San Francisco, CA, pp. 215-225
- Hargittai, E, Fullerton, L, Menchen-Trevino, E, Thomas, KY (2010) Trust online: Young adults’ evaluation of web content. International Journal of Communication 4: pp. 468-494
- Jenkins, H (2006) Convergence culture. New York University Press, New York
- Jmerik, A. (2004). Boss Everyware. (Customized version) [Computer software]. Boss Everyware, Inc. Retrieved July 14, 2004. http://www.bosseveryware.com.
- Lazonder, AW (2000) Exploring novice users’ training needs in searching information on the WWW. Journal of Computer Assisted learning 16: pp. 326-335 CrossRef
- Lenhart, A, Lewis, O, Rainie, L (2001) Teenage life online. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington DC
- Livingstone, S, Helsper, E (2007) Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people, and the digital divide. New Media & Society 9: pp. 671-696 CrossRef
- Lombard, M, Snyder-Duch, J, Bracken, CC (2002) Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research 28: pp. 587-604 CrossRef
- Mayer, RE (2009) Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY CrossRef
- Metzger, M (2007) Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58: pp. 2078-2091 CrossRef
- Nasah, A, DaCosta, B, Kinsell, C, Seok, S (2010) The digital literacy debate: An investigation of digital propensity and information and communication technology. Educational Technology Research and Development 58: pp. 531-555 CrossRef
- Oblinger, D. G. & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Educating the net generation. Boulder, CO: Educause. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen.
- Palfrey, J, Gasser, U (2008) Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. Perseus Books Group, Philadelphia, PA
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/.
- Rouet, J.-F. (2003). What was I looking for? The influence of task specificity and prior knowledge on students’ search strategies in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 15, 409–428.
- Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The skills of document use. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Salen, K (2007) Gaming literacies: A game design study in action. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 16: pp. 301-322
- Tapscott, D (1997) Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
- Wiley, J, Goldman, SR, Graesser, AC, Sanchez, CA, Ash, IK, Hemmerich, JA (2009) Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal 46: pp. 1060-1106 CrossRef
- Wineburg, SS (1991) Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive process used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology 83: pp. 73-87 CrossRef
- Knowledge and processes that predict proficiency in digital literacy
Reading and Writing
Volume 27, Issue 9 , pp 1567-1583
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Digital literacy
- Information use
- New literacies
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- 2. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
- 3. Department of Communication, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA