Reading and Writing

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 349–379

Examining the structure of reading comprehension: do literal, inferential, and evaluative comprehension truly exist?

  • Deni Basaraba
  • Paul Yovanoff
  • Julie Alonzo
  • Gerald Tindal
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11145-012-9372-9

Cite this article as:
Basaraba, D., Yovanoff, P., Alonzo, J. et al. Read Writ (2013) 26: 349. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9372-9

Abstract

Although the recent identification of the five critical components of early literacy has been a catalyst for modifications to the content of materials used to provide reading instruction and the tools used to examine student’s acquisition of early literacy skills, these skills have not received equal attention from test developers and publishers. In particular, a review of early literacy available measures for screening and monitoring students reveals a dearth of tools for examining different facets of reading comprehension. The purposes of this study were twofold: (a) to examine the relative difficulty of items written to assess literal, inferential, and evaluative comprehension, and (b) to compare single factor and bifactor models of reading comprehension to determine if items written to assess students’ literal, inferential, and evaluative comprehension abilities comprise unique measurement factors. Data from approximately 2,400 fifth grade students collected in the fall, winter, and spring of fifth grader were used to examine these questions. Findings indicated that (a) the relative difficulty of item types may be curvilinear, with literal items being significantly less challenging than inferential and evaluative items, and (b) literal, inferential, and evaluative comprehension measurement factors explained unique portions of variance in addition to a general reading comprehension factor. Instructional implications of the findings are discussed.

Keywords

Reading comprehensionAssessmentElementary reading

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deni Basaraba
    • 1
  • Paul Yovanoff
    • 2
  • Julie Alonzo
    • 3
  • Gerald Tindal
    • 3
  1. 1.Center on Teaching and LearningUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA
  2. 2.Annette Caldwell Simmons School of Education and Human DevelopmentSouthern Methodist UniversityDallasUSA
  3. 3.Behavioral Research and TeachingUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA