Chinese character decoding: a semantic bias?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The effects of semantic and phonetic radicals on Chinese character decoding were examined. Our results suggest that semantic and phonetic radicals are each available for access when a corresponding task emphasizes one or the other kind of radical. But in a more neutral lexical recognition task, the semantic radical is more informative. Semantic radicals that correctly pertain to character meaning facilitated reaction time in semantic categorization tasks (Experiment #1), while radicals that had no immediately interpretable relation to character meaning had a strong inhibitory effect. Likewise, phonetic radicals that accurately indicated a character’s pronunciation facilitated a homonym recognition task (Experiment #2), whereas phonetic radicals that differed significantly in pronunciation from their character inhibited homonym recognition. In a lexical decision task (Experiment #3) where each character had either a blurred semantic radical or a blurred phonetic radical, the characters with a blurred semantic radical elicited a significantly higher error rate and a trend for longer response times. These results are interpreted to indicate that while educated native Chinese speakers have full use of both semantic and phonetic paths to character decoding, there is a slight predisposition to semantic decoding strategies over phonetic ones indicating that the semantic path is the default means of character recognition.
- Chan, S. (1999). The Chinese learner: A question of style. Education and Training, 41, 294–304. CrossRef
- Chen, Y. P., Allport, D. A., & Marshall, J. C. (1996). What are the functional orthographic units in Chinese word recognition: The stroke or the stroke pattern? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A49, 1024–1043.
- Chikamatsu, N. (1996). The effects of L1 orthography on L2 word recognition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 403–432. CrossRef
- Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197–1211. CrossRef
- Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. CrossRef
- Ding, G., Peng, D., & Taft, M. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 530–539. CrossRef
- Fan, K. Y., Gao, J. Y., & Ao, X. P. (1984). Pronunciation principles of the Chinese character and alphabetic writing scripts. Chinese character reform, 3, 19–22. Beijing: National Commission of Chinese Character Reform (In Chinese).
- Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. T. (1999). Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 559–576. CrossRef
- Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257–287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
- Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.
- Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates, Inc.
- Huang, J. T., & Wang, M. Y. (1992). From unit to Gestalt: Perceptual dynamics in recognizing Chinese characters. In H. C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language and processing in Chinese (pp. 3–35). Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier. CrossRef
- Liu, I. M. (1983). Cueing function of fragments of Chinese characters in reading. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 25, 85–90.
- Osaka, N. (1992). Size of saccade and fixation duration of eye movements during reading: Psychophysics of Japanese text processing. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science and Vision, 9, 5–13. CrossRef
- Peng, R. X. (1982). A preliminary report on statistical analysis of the structure of Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 14, 385–390.
- Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112, 43–59. CrossRef
- Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 101–118. CrossRef
- Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berent, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a universal phonological principle. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 227–248). North Holland: Elsevier. CrossRef
- Pine, N., Huang, P., & Song, H. R. (2003). Decoding strategies used by Chinese primary school children. Journal of Literacy Research, 35, 777–812. CrossRef
- Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Siedenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115. CrossRef
- Shen, D., & Forster, K. (1999). Masked phonological priming in reading Chinese words depends on the task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 429–459. CrossRef
- Shu, H., & Anderson, R. C. (1997). Role of radical awareness in the character and word acquisition of Chinese children. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 78–89. CrossRef
- Shu, H., Meng, X. Z., Chen, X., Luan, H., & Cao, F. (2005). The subtypes of developmental dyslexia in Chinese: Evidence from three cases. Dyslexia, 11, 311–329. CrossRef
- Siedenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. CrossRef
- Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 761–775. CrossRef
- Tan, L. H., Hoosain, R., & Siok, W. W. T. (1996). Activation of phonological codes before access to character meaning in written Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 22, 865–882. CrossRef
- Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. M. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York: Academic Press.
- Weekes, B. S., Chen, M. J., & Yin, W.-G. (1997). Anomia without dyslexia in Chinese. Neurocase, 3, 51–60. CrossRef
- Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 1245–1265.
- Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 525–565. CrossRef
- Chinese character decoding: a semantic bias?
Reading and Writing
Volume 23, Issue 5 , pp 589-605
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Chinese character processing
- Chinese reading
- Dual route
- Semantic activation
- Phonological activation