Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foertsch, M. A. (1990). Learning to write in our nation’s schools: Instruction and achievement in 1988 at grades 4, 8, and 12. Princeton, NJ: Education Testing Service.
Beach, R., & Friedrich, T. (2006). Response to writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 222–234). New York: Guilford.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Black, K. (1989). Audience analysis and persuasive writing at the college level. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 231–249.
Boscolo, P., & Ascorti, K. (2004). Effects of collaborative revision on children’s ability to write understandable narrative texts. In L. Allal, L. Chanqouy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 157–170). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
Brassart, D. G. (1992). Negotiation, concession, and refutation in counterargumentative composition by pupils from 8 to 12 years old and adult. Argumentation
Butterfield, E. C., Hacker, D. J., & Albertson, R. L. (1996). Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence. Educational Psychology Review
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coirier, P., Andriessen, J., & Chanquoy, L. (1999). From planning to translating: The specificity of argumentative writing. In J. Andriessen, & P. Coirier (Eds.), Foundation of argumentative text processing (pp. 1–28). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
DiPardo, A., & Freedman, S. W. (1988). Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic foundations and new directions. Review of Educational Research
Ferretti, R. P., MacArthur, C. A., & Dowdy, N. S. (2000). The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers. Journal of Educational Psychology
Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research
Fitzgerald, J., & Stamm, C. (1990). Effects of group conferences on first graders’ revision in writing. Written Communication
Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J.R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg, & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–49). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Golder, C., & Coirier, P. (1994). Argumentative text writing: Developmental trends. Discourse Processes
Graham, S., MacArthur, C. A., & Schwartz, S. (1995). Effects of goal setting and procedural facilitation on the revising behavior and writing performance of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology
Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
Greenwald, E., Persky, H., Campbell, J., & Mazzeo, J. (1999). National assessment of educational progress: 1998 report card for the nation and the states. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
Hayes, J. R. (2004). What triggers revision? In L. Allal, & L. Chanquoy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 9–20). Norwell, NJ: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hayes, J. R., Flower, L. S., Schriver, K. A., Stratman, J., & Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in psycholinguistics: Vol.2. Reading, writing, and language processing (pp. 176–240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Holliway, R. D., & McCutchen, D. (2004). Audience perspective in young writers’ composing, revising. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 157–170). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Inch, E. S., & Warnick, B. (2002). Critical thinking and communication: The use of reason in argument (4th ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kanaris, A. (1999). Gendered journeys: Children’s writing and the construction of gender. Language and Education
MacArthur, C. A. (2007). Best practices in teaching evaluation and revision. In S. Graham, C. A. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (pp. 141–162). New York: Guilford.
MacArthur, C. A., Schwartz, S. S., & Graham, S. (1991). Effects of a reciprocal revision strategy in special education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research, 6, 201–210.
Maki, H. S., Voeten, M. J. M., Vauras, M. S. M., & Poskiparta, E. H. (2001). Predicting writing skill development with word recognition and preschool readiness skills. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal
Matsuhashi, A., & E. Gordon (1985). Revision, addition, and the power of unseen text. In S. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision. (pp. 236–249). Norwood, NJ, Ablex.
McCutchen, D., Francis, M., & Kerr, S. (1997). Revising for meaning: Effects of knowledge and strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology
Nussbaum, E. M., & Kardash, C. M. (2005). The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing. Journal of Educational Psychology
Persky, H., Daane, M., & Jin, Y. (2003). The nation’s report card: Writing. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
Piolat, A., Roussey, J., & Gombert, A. (1999). The development of argumentative schema in writing. In J. Andriessen, & P. Coirier (Eds.), Foundation of argumentative text processing (pp. 117–136). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Pritchard, R. J., & Honeycutt, R. L. (2007). Best practices in implementing a process approach to writing. In S. Graham, C. A. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (pp. 28–49). New York: Guilford.
Rieke, R. D., & Sillars, M. O. (2001). Argumentation and critical decision making (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
Roen, D. H., & Willey, R. J. (1988). The effects of audience awareness on drafting and revising. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 75–85.
Roussey, J. Y., & Gombert, A. (1996). Improving argumentative writing skills: Effect of two types of aids. Argumentation
Stoddard, B., & MacArthur, C. A. (1993). A peer editor strategy: Guiding learning-disabled students in response and revision. Research in Teaching of English, 27, 76–103.
Willingham, W. W., Cole, N. S., Lewis, C., & Leung, S. W. (1997). Test performance. In W. W. Willingham, & N. S. Cole (Eds.). Gender and fair assessment (pp. 55–126). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wong, B. Y. L., Butler, D. L., Ficzere, S. A., Kuperis, S., Corden, M., & Zelmer, J. (1994). Teaching problem learners revision skills and sensitivity to audience through two instructional modes: Student-teacher versus student-student interactive dialogues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 78–90.