The financial reporting of fair value based on managerial inputs versus market inputs: evidence from mortgage servicing rights
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This research examines whether the fair value of mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) based on managerial inputs (Level 3) better reflects the cash flow and risk characteristics of the underlying assets than the fair value of MSRs based on market inputs (Level 2). Using mortgage servicing fees as a proxy for the underlying cash flows, we find that the valuation multiples for MSRs based on Level 3 inputs are more positively associated with the persistence of future servicing fees compared with the fair value of MSRs based on Level 2 inputs. We also document that only the valuation multiples based on Level 3 fair values are negatively associated with proxies for risk factors. Our results suggest that, although unobservable inputs are subject to managerial discretions, managers can generate higher quality fair value estimates than market inputs due to their information advantage, especially when the market for the underlying asset is inactive.
- Aboody, D, Barth, M, Kasznik, R (1999) Revaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26: pp. 149-178 CrossRef
- Aldrich, S, Greenberg, WR, Payner, B (2001) A capital markets view of mortgage servicing rights. The Journal of Fixed Income 11: pp. 37-53 CrossRef
- Altamuro, J, Beatty, AL (2010) How does internal control regulation affect financial reporting?. Journal of Accounting and Economics 49: pp. 58-74 CrossRef
- Barth, M. (1991). Relative measurement errors among alternative pension asset and liability measures. The Accounting Review, 66, 433–463.
- Botosan, C., Carrizosa, R., & Huffman, A. (2011). Factors influencing banks’ use of level 3 valuation inputs during the financial crisis, working paper, University of Utah.
- Brown, S, Hayre, LS, Lauterbach, K, Payne, R, Zimmerman, T (1992) Analysis of mortgage servicing portfolios. The Journal of Fixed Income 2: pp. 60-75 CrossRef
- Buttimer, R, Lin, C-C (2005) Valuing US and Canadian mortgage servicing rights with default and prepayment. Journal of Housing Economics 14: pp. 194-211 CrossRef
- Choi, B., Collins, D., & Johnson, B. (1997). Valuation implications of reliability differences: The case of nonpension postretirement obligations. The Accounting Review, 72, 351–383.
- Cotter, J, Richardson, S (2002) Reliability of asset revaluations: The impact of appraiser independence. Review of Accounting Studies 7: pp. 435-457 CrossRef
- Dietrich, R, Harris, M, Muller, K (2001) The reliability of investment property fair value estimates. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30: pp. 125-158 CrossRef
- Emrick, C. (2006 May). New FASB statement requires initial fair value treatment for servicing assets and liabilities: Look for increases in gain on sale revenues at mortgage companies. Moody’s Investor Services.
- Goh, B. W., Ng, J., & Yong, K. O. (2009). Market pricing of banks’ fair value assets reported under SFAS 157 during the 2008 economic crisis, working paper, MIT.
- Kolev, K (2009) Do investors perceive marking-to-model as marking-to-myth? Early evidence from FAS 157 disclosure. New York University, Working Paper
- Laux, C, Leuz, C (2009) The crisis of fair-value accounting: Making sense of the recent debate. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34: pp. 826-834 CrossRef
- Laux, C, Leuz, C (2010) Did fair value accounting contribute to the financial crisis?. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 24: pp. 93-118 CrossRef
- Maines, L, Wahlen, J (2006) The nature of accounting information reliability: Inference from archival and experimental research. Accounting Horizons 20: pp. 399-425 CrossRef
- Muller, K (1999) An examination of the voluntary recognition of acquired brand names in the United Kingdom. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26: pp. 179-191 CrossRef
- Pfeiffer, R (1998) Market Value and Accounting Implications of Off-Balance-Sheet Items. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 17: pp. 185-207 CrossRef
- Riedl, E., & Serafeim, G. (2009). Information risk and fair value: An examination of equity betas and bid-ask spreads. Working paper, Harvard Business School.
- Ryan, SG (2008) Accounting in and for the subprime crisis. The Accounting Review 83: pp. 1605-1638 CrossRef
- Sloan, R (1999) Evaluating the reliability of current value estimates. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26: pp. 193-200 CrossRef
- Song, J. C., Thomas, W., & Yi, H. (2010). Value relevance of FAS no. 157 fair value hierarchy information and the impact of corporate governance mechanisms. The Accounting Review, 85, 1375–1410.
- Urumoglu, U. (2010). Demystifying the valuation of mortgage servicing rights. www.cunacfocouncil.org.
- The financial reporting of fair value based on managerial inputs versus market inputs: evidence from mortgage servicing rights
Review of Accounting Studies
Volume 18, Issue 3 , pp 833-858
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Mortgage servicing rights
- Fair value
- Market inputs
- Managerial inputs
- FAS 157
- Industry Sectors