Arend, R. (2007). Abandoning entrepreneurship: children and victims first. Strategic Organization, 54
, 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argarwal, R., Barney, J. B., Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2009). Heterogeneous resources and the financial crisis: Implications of strategic management theory. Strategic Organization, 74
, 467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baetjer, H. (1998). Software as capital: An economic perspectives on software engineering
. Los Alamos: IFEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
Baetjer, H. (2000). Capital as embodied knowledge: Some implications for the theory of economic growth. Review of Austrian Economics, 13
(1), 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baetjer, H., & Lewin, P. (2008). Can ideas be capital: Can capital be anything else? Available from: http://www.utdallas.edu/~plewin/Can%20Ideas%20be%20Captal.pdf
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design Rules: Volume 1. The Power of Modularity Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Baldwin, C. Y. (2008). Where do transactions costs come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 171
, 155–195.Google Scholar
Barzel, Y. (1997). Economic analysis of property rights
(2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1889 ). Capital and Interest. 3 vols. (Trans. G. D. Huncke and H. F. Sennholz) South Holland, IL: Libertarian Press.
Bromilley, P. and Papenhausen, C. (2003) Assumptions of Rationality and Equilibrium in Strategy Research: The Limits of Traditional Economic Analysis. Strategic Organization November 1: pp 413–437.
Chiles, T. H., Bluedorn, A. C., & Gupta, V. K. (2007). Beyond creative destruction and entrepreneurial discovery: A radical austrian approach to entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 28
, 467–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiles, T. H., Bluedorn, A. C., & Gupta, V. K. (2008). On Lachmannian and effectual entrepreneurship: A rejoinder to Sarasvathy and Dew 2008. Organization Studies, 2902
, 247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4
, 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, K. B., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm
. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Dean, A., & Kretschmer, M. (2007). Can ideas be capital? Factors of production in the postindustrial economy: A review and critique. Academy of Management Review, 32
(2), 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N. J. (1996a). Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organization Science, 75
, 470–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N. J. (1996b). More critical comments on knowledge-based theories of the firm. Organization Science, 75
, 519–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N. J. (1997). Resources, firms and strategy: A reader in the resource-based perspective
. Oxford: Oxford.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J. (2001). Leadership, beliefs and coordination. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10
, 357–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, K., Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2007a). Original and derived judgment: An entrepreneurial theory of economic organization. Organization Studies, 2806
, 1–20.Google Scholar
Foss, K., Foss, N. J., Klein, P. G., & Klein, S. K. (2007b). The 7 November, entrepreneurial organization of heterogeneous capital. Journal of Management Studies, 44
, 1165–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N., & Ishikawa, I. (2007). Towards a dynamic resource-based view: Insights from Austrian capital and entrepreneurship theory. Organization Studies, 2805
, 749–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship and heterogeneous capital. Chapter 4 of Foss, NJ and Klein, PG. Opportunity discovery and economic organization: Entrepreneurship and the theory of the firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foss, N. J., Klein, P. G., Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2008). Entrepreneurship, subjectivism, and the resource-based view: Toward a new synthesis. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2
, 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Langlois, R. N. (Eds.). (2003). Managing in the modular age: Architectures, networks and organizations
. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17
(Winter Special Issue), 109–122.Google Scholar
Hart, O. (1995). Firms, contracts and financial structure
. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. In: Hayek 1948.
Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and economic order
. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty
. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jenson, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1992). Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. In L. Werin & H. Wijkander (Eds.), Contract economics
(pp. 252–274). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Klein, P. G. (2008). Opportunity and discovery: Entrepreneurial action and economic organization. Strategic Entrepreneurial Journal, 2
, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, F. H. (1921 ). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Chicago: Kelly.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3
, 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 75
, 502–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kor, Y. Y., Mahoney, J. T., & Michael, S. C. (2007). Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of Management Studies, 447
, 1187–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachmann, L. M. (1956 ). Capital and its structure. Kansas City: Sheed, Andrews and McMeel.
Lachmann, L. M. (1971). The legacy of Max Weber
. Berkley: Glendessary Press.Google Scholar
Langlois, R. N. (2002). Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 491, 19–37; reprinted in Nicolai Foss and Peter Klein, eds., Entrepreneurship and the theory of the firm. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002.
Langlois, R. N. (2007). The Austrian theory of the firm: Retrospect and prospect
. Available from: http://web.uconn.edu/ciom/Langlois_GMU_paper_May_2007.pdf
Langlois, R. N., & Robertson, P. L. (1995). Firms, markets, and economic change: A dynamic theory of business institutions
(p. 1995). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lewin, P. (1994). Knowledge, Expectations and Capital: The Economics of Ludwig M. Lachmann. Advances in Austrian Economics 1, 1994, pp. 233–256.
Lewin, P. (1997). Capital in Disequilibrium: A Reexamination of the Capital Theory of Ludwig Lachmann. History of Political Economy
Lewin, P. (1999). Capital in disequilibrium: the role of capital in a changing world
. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, P. (2005). The capital idea and the scope of economics. Review of Austrian Economics, 182
, 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, P. (2008). The firm in disequilibrium: Contributions from the Austrian tradition. Advances in Austrian Economics, 11
, 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, P. (2011). A Capital-Based Approach to the Firm: Reflections on the Nature and Scope of the Concept of Capital and its Extension to Intangibles. In Burton, A. and Spender, J. C. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Human Capital Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loasby, B. J. (2007). The ubiquity of organization. Organization Studies, 2811
, 1729–1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, J. (2006a). Strategizing, disequilibrium, and profit
. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mathews, J. (2006b). Ricardian rents or Knightian profits? More on Austrian insights on strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 41
, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, J. (2010). Lachmannian insights into strategic entrepreneurship: Resources, activities and routines in a disequilibrium world. Organization Studies, 312
, 219–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menger, C. (1871 ). Principles of economics. New York: New York University Press.
Mises, L. (1949). Human action
. San Francisco: Fox and Wiles.Google Scholar
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change
. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. (1959 ). The theory of the growth of the firm. London: Basil Blackwell.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance
. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, G. B. (1960 ). Information and investment: A study in the working of the competitive economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sarasvathy, S., & Dew, N. (2008). Is effectuation Lachmannian? A response to Chiles, Bluedorn, and Gupta 2007. Organization Studies, 2902
, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sautet, F. (2001). An entrepreneurial theory of the firm
. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1954). History of economic analysis
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776 ). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Solow, R. M. (1956) A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17
, 11–25.Google Scholar
Tulloh, B., & Miller, M. S. (2006). Institutions as abstract boundaries. In J. High (Ed.), Humane economics: Essays in honor of Don Lavoie
(pp. 89–118). Northhampton: Eward Elgar.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V. (1994). Organizations as constitutional systems. In: Rules and choice in economics, chapter 8. Routledge pp. 125–143.
Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism
. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar