Review of Theodore A. Burczak’s Socialism after Hayek
- Virgil Henry Storr
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
For most Austrians, the collapse of the Soviet Union just proved something that we had long since known. Socialism as we understand it (i.e., the elimination of private ownership of the means of production) is impossible; or, to be more precise, rational economic calculation in the absence of private property and so in the absence of competition between severally owned firms over resources, meaningful prices which reflect relative scarcities and profit and loss accounting, is impossible. Attempts by market socialists like Lange (1936) to come up with a “competitive” response to the Austrian critique, as Lavoie (1985) has shown, have failed to answer Austrian concerns. Interestingly, they have not taken Marx all that seriously either, abandoning key features of his program like his concern for alienation and exploitation. Burczak, however, does not commit either sin. His Socialism after Hayek is a stimulating book that is grounded in Burczak’s deep appreciation of both the Austrian crit ...
- Ackerman, B., & Alstott, A. (1999). The stakeholder society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Lange, O. (1936). On the economic theory of socialism: Part one. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(1), 53–71. CrossRef
- Lavoie, D. (1985). Rivalry and central planning: The socialist calculation debate reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Review of Theodore A. Burczak’s Socialism after Hayek
The Review of Austrian Economics
Volume 20, Issue 4 , pp 313-316
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Arlington, VA, 22201, USA