Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 in clinical practice for patient management: identifying scores requiring a clinician’s attention
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Snyder, C.F., Blackford, A.L., Okuyama, T. et al. Qual Life Res (2013) 22: 2685. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0387-8
- 516 Downloads
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used increasingly for individual patient management. Identifying which PRO scores require a clinician’s attention is an ongoing challenge. Previous research used a needs assessment to identify EORTC-QLQ-C30 cutoff scores representing unmet needs. This analysis attempted to replicate the previous findings in a new and larger sample.
This analysis used data from 408 Japanese ambulatory breast cancer patients who completed the QLQ-C30 and Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form-34 (SCNS-SF34). Applying the methods used previously, SCNS-SF34 item/domain scores were dichotomized as no versus some unmet need. We calculated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to evaluate QLQ-C30 scores’ ability to discriminate between patients with no versus some unmet need based on SCNS-SF34 items/domains. For QLQ-C30 domains with AUC ≥ 0.70, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of various cutoffs for identifying unmet needs. We hypothesized that compared to our original analysis, (1) the same six QLQ-C30 domains would have AUC ≥ 0.70, (2) the same SCNS-SF34 items would be best discriminated by QLQ-C30 scores, and (3) the sensitivity and specificity of our original cutoff scores would be supported.
The findings from our original analysis were supported. The same six domains with AUC ≥ 0.70 in the original analysis had AUC ≥ 0.70 in this new sample, and the same SCNS-SF34 item was best discriminated by QLQ-C30 scores. Cutoff scores were identified with sensitivity ≥0.84 and specificity ≥0.54.
Given these findings’ concordance with our previous analysis, these QLQ-C30 cutoffs could be implemented in clinical practice and their usefulness evaluated.
KeywordsEORTC-QLQ-C30Patient-reported outcomesClinical practiceCancer
Area under the curve
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30
Negative predictive value
Positive predictive value
Receiver operating characteristic
Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form-34