Quality of Life Research

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 1201–1211

Monitoring population health for Healthy People 2020: evaluation of the NIH PROMIS® Global Health, CDC Healthy Days, and satisfaction with life instruments

  • John P. Barile
  • Bryce B. Reeve
  • Ashley Wilder Smith
  • Matthew M. Zack
  • Sandra A. Mitchell
  • Rosemarie Kobau
  • David F. Cella
  • Cecily Luncheon
  • William W. Thompson
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0246-z

Cite this article as:
Barile, J.P., Reeve, B.B., Smith, A.W. et al. Qual Life Res (2013) 22: 1201. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0246-z
  • 1k Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Healthy People 2020 identified health-related quality of life and well-being (WB) as indicators of population health for the next decade. This study examined the measurement properties of the NIH PROMIS® Global Health Scale, the CDC Healthy Days items, and associations with the Satisfaction with Life Scale.

Methods

A total of 4,184 adults completed the Porter Novelli’s HealthStyles mailed survey. Physical and mental health (9 items from PROMIS Global Scale and 3 items from CDC Healthy days measure), and 4 WB factor items were tested for measurement equivalence using multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis.

Results

The CDC items accounted for similar variance as the PROMIS items on physical and mental health factors; both factors were moderately correlated with WB. Measurement invariance was supported across gender and age; the magnitude of some factor loadings differed between those with and without a chronic medical condition.

Conclusions

The PROMIS, CDC, and WB items all performed well. The PROMIS items captured a broad range of functioning across the entire continuum of physical and mental health, while the CDC items appear appropriate for assessing burden of disease for chronic conditions and are brief and easily interpretable. All three measures under study appear to be appropriate measures for monitoring several aspects of the Healthy People 2020 goals and objectives.

Keywords

Health-related quality of life Well-being Measurement invariance Structural equation modeling Population health Healthy People 2020 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Barile
    • 5
  • Bryce B. Reeve
    • 2
  • Ashley Wilder Smith
    • 3
  • Matthew M. Zack
    • 1
  • Sandra A. Mitchell
    • 3
  • Rosemarie Kobau
    • 1
  • David F. Cella
    • 4
  • Cecily Luncheon
    • 1
  • William W. Thompson
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Population Health, NCCDPHPUS Centers for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Outcomes Research Branch, Applied Research ProgramDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer InstituteBethesdaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Medical Social SciencesNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA
  5. 5.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Hawai‘i at MānoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations