From well-being to positive mental health: conceptualization and qualitative development of an instrument in Singapore
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
There is no global definition of well-being. Cultural differences in the perception of well-being and the social and behavioral contexts further limit its measurement. Existing instruments are developed in Western societies that differ in their conceptualization of well-being from Asian populations. Moreover, very few instruments address the multidimensional construct of well-being.
Literature was reviewed to develop a priori conceptual framework of mental health and well-being. Concepts were identified based on specific criteria to guide the qualitative investigations. Finally, focus group discussions were conducted among adults belonging to the three major ethnicities in Singapore to identify salient domains of mental health and well-being.
Mental well-being is a multidimensional construct constituting of positive affect, satisfaction, and psychological functioning. While well-being explains the functional and psychological components, positive mental health is a combination of these and the skills required to achieve them. Although there is an overlap between the concepts identified from the literature and those identified in Singapore, certain differences existed, particularly with the relevance attributed to family interactions and religiosity or spirituality. Similar findings were observed across the three ethnic groups.
Domains identified can be used to develop a culturally relevant instrument in Singapore.
- Becker, T., Leese, M., Clarkson, P., et al. (1988). Links between social networks and quality of life: An epidemiologically representative study of psychotic patients in South London. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 33(7), 299–304. CrossRef
- Bradley, D. E. (1995). Religious involvement and social resources: Evidence from the data set ‘Americans Changing Lives’. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34(2), 259–267. CrossRef
- Dalkey, N. C. (1972). The Delphi method: An experimental application of group opinion. In N. C. Dalkey, D. L. Rourke, R. Lewis, & D. Snyder (Eds.), Studies in the quality of life. Lexington: Lexington Books.
- Dear, K., Henderson, S., & Korten, A. (2002). Well-being in Australia—Findings from National Survey of mental health and well-being. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 37(11), 503–509. CrossRef
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. CrossRef
- DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229. CrossRef
- Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2000). Subjective emotional well-being. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 325–337). New York: Guilford.
- Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(5), 1–31. CrossRef
- Gilbert, P., & Nicholls, V. (2003). Inspiring hope: Recognising the importance of spirituality in a whole person approach to mental health. London: National Institute for Mental Health in England.
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
- Humphreys, K., Mankowski, E. S., Moos, R. H., & Finney, J. W. (1999). Do enhanced friendship networks and active coping mediate the effect of self-help groups on substance abuse? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21(1), 54–60. CrossRef
- Kammann, R., & Flett, R. (1983). Source book for measuring well-being with Affectometer 2, Dunedin, New Zealand: Why not? Foundation Psychologist, 35, 259–265.
- Krause, N. (1995). Religiosity and self-esteem among older adults. The Journals of Gerentology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 50(5), 236–246. CrossRef
- Lee, E. (2007). Religion and spirituality as predictors of well-being among Chinese American and Korean American older adults. Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging, 19(3), 77–100. CrossRef
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publication.
- Maslow, A., Robert, F., & James, F. (1987). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
- Oishi, S., Choi, D. W., Diener, E., et al. (2007). The dynamics of daily events and well-being across cultures: When less is more. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 685–698. CrossRef
- Quintiliani, L., Campbell, M., Haines, P., & Webber, K. (2009). The use of the pile sort method in identifying groups of healthful lifestyle behaviors among female community college students. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 108(9), 1503–1507. CrossRef
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. CrossRef
- Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, L. M. C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. CrossRef
- Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. CrossRef
- Seeman, T. E. (2000). Health promoting effects of friends and family on health outcomes in older adults. American Journal of Health Promotion, 14(6), 362–370. CrossRef
- Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.
- Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 482–493. CrossRef
- Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., et al. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(63), 1477–7525.
- Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. California: Sage Publications.
- Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. CrossRef
- World Health Organization Promoting Mental Health. (2004). Concepts emerging evidence and practice. Summary report.
- World Health Organization. (1998). WHOQOL and spirituality, religiousness and personal beliefs: Report on WHO consultation. Geneva: WHO.
- World Health Organization. (2001). Strengthening mental health promotion.
- www.healthscotland.com/understanding/population/mental-health-indicators.aspx. Review of scales of positive mental health validated for use with adults in the UK: Technical report. Accessed 13 Nov 2011.
- Zhang, L. (2005). Prediction of Chinese life satisfaction; contribution of collective self-esteem. International Journal of Psychology, 40(3), 189–200. CrossRef
- From well-being to positive mental health: conceptualization and qualitative development of an instrument in Singapore
Quality of Life Research
Volume 21, Issue 10 , pp 1785-1794
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Positive mental health
- Mental well-being
- Focus group discussion
- Instrument development
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Woodbridge Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- 2. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
- 4. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 3. School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore