Population-level response shift: novel implications for research
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Response shift is a change in perceived HRQL that occurs as a result of recalibration, reprioritization, or reconceptualization of an individual respondent’s internal standards, values, or conceptualization of HRQL. In this commentary, we suggest that response shift may also occur at the population level, triggered by causes that affect the distribution of individual-level risk.
We illustrated the nature and consequences of potential population-level response shift with two examples: the September 11 terror attacks, and the recent denormalization of smoking.
Response shift may occur at the population-level, when a large proportion of the population experiences the shift simultaneously, as a unit, and when the cause of the response shift is a socially significant event or trend. Such catalysts are of a qualitatively different nature than the causes leading to health status changes among individuals, and speak to the determinants affecting the underlying distribution of risk in the population.
We do not know if population-level causes have actually resulted in response shifts. Nonetheless, response shifts at the population-level may be worthwhile to investigate further, both to assess the validity of research evidence based on the measurement of HRQL in large populations, and as a desirable intermediate outcome in evaluations of population health programs.
- Ubel, P. A., Peeters, Y., & Smith, D. (2010). Abandoning the language of “response shift”: A plea for conceptual clarity in distinguishing scale recalibration from true changes in quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 465–471. CrossRef
- Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (2010). Do not throw out the baby with the bath water: Build on current approaches to realize conceptual clarity. Response to Ubel, Peeters, and Smith. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 477–479. CrossRef
- Eton, D. T. (2010). Why we need response shift: An appeal to functionalism. Quality of Life Research, 19(6), 929–930. CrossRef
- Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515. CrossRef
- Korfage, I. J., Koning, H. J., & Essink-Bot, M.-L. (2007). Response shift due to diagnosis and primary treatment of localized prostate cancer: A then-test and a vignette study. Quality of Life Research, 16(10), 1627–1634. CrossRef
- Galea, S., Resnick, H., Ahern, J., Gold, J., Bucuvalas, M., Kilpatrick, D., et al. (2002). Posttraumatic stress disorder in Manhattan, New York City, after the September 11th terrorist attacks. Journal of Urban Health, 79(3), 340–353. CrossRef
- Silver, R. C., Holman, E. A., Mcintosh, D. N., Poulin, M., & Gil-Rivas, V. (2002). Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. JAMA, 288(10), 1235–1244. CrossRef
- Holman, E. A., Silver, R. C., Poulin, M., Andersen, J., Gil-Rivas, V., & Mcintosh, D. N. (2008). Terrorism, acute stress, and cardiovascular health: A 3-year national study following the September 11th attacks. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65(1), 73–80. CrossRef
- Poulin, M. J., Silver, R. C., Gil-Rivas, V., Holman, E. A., & Mcintosh, D. N. (2009). Finding social benefits after a collective trauma: Perceiving societal changes and well-being following 9/11. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(2), 81–90. CrossRef
- Ai, A. L., Cascio, T., Santangelo, L. K., & Evans-Campbell, T. (2005). Hope, meaning, and growth following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(5), 523–548. CrossRef
- Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2003). Character strengths before and after September 11. Psycholological Science, 14(4), 381–384. CrossRef
- Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2008). The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New England Journal of Medicine, 358(21), 2249–2258. CrossRef
- Hammond, D., Fong, G. T., Zanna, M. P., Thrasher, J. F., & Borland, R. (2006). Tobacco denormalization and industry beliefs among smokers from four countries. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 31(3), 225–232. CrossRef
- Fong, G. T., Hammond, D., Laux, F. L., Zanna, M. P., Cummings, K. M., Borland, R., et al. (2004). The near-universal experience of regret among smokers in four countries: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 6(Suppl), 3S341–3S351.
- Chapman, S., & Freeman, B. (2008). Markers of the denormalisation of smoking and the tobacco industry. Tobacco Control, 17(1), 25–31. CrossRef
- Steering Committee of the National Strategy to Reduce Tobacco Use in Canada. (1999). New directions for tobacco control in Canada: A National Strategy. Ministry of Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1–33.
- Martinez, J. A. B., Mota, G. A., Vianna, E. S. O., Filho, J. T., Silva, G. A., & Rodrigues, A. L. (2004). Impaired quality of life of healthy young smokers. Chest, 125(2), 425–428. CrossRef
- Hyland, A., Li, Q., Bauer, J. E., Giovino, G. A., Steger, C., & Cummings, K. M. (2004). Predictors of cessation in a cohort of current and former smokers followed over 13 years. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 6(Suppl), 3S363–3S369.
- Dolan, P., Gudex, C., Kind, P., & Williams, A. (1996). The time trade-off method: Results from a general population study. Health Economics, 5(2), 141–154. CrossRef
- Shaw, J. W., Johnson, J. A., & Coons, S. J. (2005). US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Medical Care, 43(3), 203–220. CrossRef
- Fryback, D. G. (2005). A US valuation of the EQ-5D. Medical Care, 43(3), 199–200. CrossRef
- Luo, N., Johnson, J. A., Shaw, J. W., & Coons, S. J. (2007). A comparison of EQ-5D index scores derived from the US and UK population-based scoring functions. Medical Decision Making, 27(3), 321–326. CrossRef
- Johnson, J. A., Luo, N., Shaw, J. W., Kind, P., & Coons, S. J. (2005). Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different? Medical Care, 43(3), 221–228. CrossRef
- Rose, G. (2008). Rose’s strategy of preventive medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Population-level response shift: novel implications for research
Quality of Life Research
Volume 21, Issue 9 , pp 1495-1498
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Response shift
- Health-related quality of life
- Population health
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, 2-040 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada