Quality of Life Research

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 833–844

Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life in prostate cancer survivors and their intimate or family partners


    • College of NursingThe University of Arizona
  • Chris Segrin
    • Department of CommunicationThe University of Arizona
  • Aurelio J. Figueredo
    • Department of PsychologyThe University of Arizona
  • Joanne Harrington
    • Division of Hematology and OncologyPhoenix Veterans’ Affairs Health Care System
  • Kate Sheppard
    • Division of Health Sciences, Orvis School of NursingThe University of Nevada Reno
  • Stacey Passalacqua
    • Department of CommunicationThe University of Arizona
  • Alice Pasvogel
    • College of NursingThe University of Arizona
  • Maria Bishop
    • Arizona Cancer Center and Southern Arizona Veterans’ Affairs Health Care System

DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9822-2

Cite this article as:
Badger, T.A., Segrin, C., Figueredo, A.J. et al. Qual Life Res (2011) 20: 833. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9822-2



The primary purpose was to test the effectiveness of two telephone-delivered psychosocial interventions for maintaining and improving quality of life (QOL) (psychological, physical, social, and spiritual well-being) among 71 prostate cancer survivors and the 70 intimate or family partners who were supporting them in their recovery.


This study used a three-wave repeated measures experimental design. Both the interpersonal counseling intervention (TIP-C) and health education attention condition (HEAC) were delivered using the telephone.


Improvements in depression, negative affect, stress, fatigue, and spiritual well-being were significantly higher for survivors in the HEAC than for those in the TIP-C condition. Partners in the HEAC condition showed significantly greater improvements in depression, fatigue, social support from family members, social well-being, and spiritual well-being compared to partners in the TIP-C condition. The results revealed superior outcomes for those assigned to the HEAC intervention.


The psychosocial interventions in this study were effective in maintaining or improving the QOL for prostate cancer survivors and their partners. Both the survivor and their intimate partner or family member benefitted from the interventions. Future research is needed to determine the optimal timing and client characteristics for each intervention.


Psychosocial interventionsQOLProstate cancerIntimate partnerFamily members

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010