Interference with activities due to pain and fatigue: accuracy of ratings across different reporting periods
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This study examined the impact of different reporting period lengths on the accuracy of items measuring interference due to pain and fatigue with work, walking, and relations with others.
Six items from well-established instruments (Brief Pain Inventory, Brief Fatigue Inventory, SF-36) were investigated in a prospective study of 117 patients with chronic rheumatological illness. Daily ratings were compared with recall ratings of 1, 3, 7, and 28-day reporting periods.
The level of recall ratings (RRs) for reporting periods of 3 days or more were significantly higher than the level of aggregated end-of-day (EOD) ratings. Correspondence between aggregated EOD and RRs was good (r ≥ .80) regardless of the length of the reporting period. Ratings of interference for a single day were highly correlated with aggregated EOD for up to 14 days prior to the single rating (r ≥ .76).
Recall ratings with reporting periods of up to a month yield good correspondence with aggregated daily ratings, although the absolute level of the rating will be inflated for recall periods of 3 days or longer.
- Mendoza, T. R., Wang, X. S., Cleeland, C. S., Morrissey, M., Johnson, B. A., Wendt, J. K., et al. (1999). The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: Use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Cancer, 85(5), 1186–1196. CrossRef
- Daut, R. L., & Cleeland, C. S. (1982). The prevalence and severity of pain in cancer. Cancer, 50(9), 1913–1918. CrossRef
- Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376. CrossRef
- Ware, J. E. (1993). SF-36 health survey: Manual & interpretive guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
- Kerns, R., Turk, D., & Rudy, T. (1985). The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain, 23, 345–356. CrossRef
- Salovey, P., Smith, A., Turk, D. C., Jobe, J. B., & Willis, G. B. (1993). The accuracy of memories for pain: Not so bad most of the time. American Pain Society Journal, 2, 184–191.
- Broderick, J. E., Schwartz, J. E., Vikingstad, G., Pribbernow, M., Grossman, S., & Stone, A. A. (2008). The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods. Pain, 139, 146–157. CrossRef
- Stone, A., Broderick, J., Kaell, A., DelesPaul, P., & Porter, L. (2000). Does the peak-end phenomenon observed in laboratory pain studies apply to real-world pain in rheumatoid arthritics? Journal of Pain, 1(3), 212–217.
- Fredrickson, B. (2000). Extracting meaning from past affective experiences: The importance of peaks, ends, and specific emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 577–606. CrossRef
- Keller, S. D., Bayliss, M. S., Ware, J. E., Jr., Hsu, M. A., Damiano, A. M., & Goss, T. F. (1997). Comparison of responses to SF-36 Health Survey questions with one-week and four-week recall periods. Health Services Research, 32(3), 367–384.
- Stone, A. A., Broderick, J. E., Schwartz, J. E., & Schwarz, N. (2008). Context effects in survey ratings of health, symptoms, and satisfaction. Medical Care, 46(7), 662–667. CrossRef
- Stone, A., Broderick, J., Shiffman, S., & Schwartz, J. (2004). Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: Absolute accuracy, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain. Pain, 107, 61–69. CrossRef
- Williams, D. A., Gendreau, M., Hufford, M. R., Groner, K., Gracely, R. H., & Clauw, D. J. (2004). Pain assessment in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: A consideration of methods for clinical trials. Clinical Journal of Pain, 20(5), 348–356. CrossRef
- Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Dewey, J. E. (2000). How to Score Version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.
- Krupp, L. B., LaRocca, N. G., Muir-Nash, J., & Steinberg, A. D. (1989). The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol, 46(10), 1121–1123.
- Stone, A., Shiffman, S., Schwartz, J., Broderick, J., & Hufford, M. (2002). Patient non-compliance with paper diaries. British Medical Journal, 324(7347), 1193–1194. CrossRef
- van den Brink, M., Bandell-Hoekstra, E. N., & Abu-Saad, H. H. (2001). The occurrence of recall bias in pediatric headache: A comparison of questionnaire and diary data. Headache, 41(1), 11–20. CrossRef
- Interference with activities due to pain and fatigue: accuracy of ratings across different reporting periods
Quality of Life Research
Volume 19, Issue 8 , pp 1163-1170
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Momentary assessment
- Quality of life
- Patient reported outcomes
- Industry Sectors