Measuring health-related quality of life in population-based studies of coronary heart disease: comparing six generic indexes and a disease-specific proxy score
To compare HRQoL differences with CHD in generic indexes and a proxy CVD-specific score in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults.
The National Health Measurement Study, a cross-sectional random-digit-dialed telephone survey of adults aged 35–89, administered the EQ-5D, QWB-SA, HUI2, HUI3, SF-36v2™ (yielding PCS, MCS, and SF-6D), and HALex. Analyses compared 3,350 without CHD (group 1), 265 with CHD not taking chest pain medication (group 2), and 218 with CHD currently taking chest pain medication (group 3), with and without adjustment for demographic variables and comorbidities. Data on 154 patients from heart failure clinics were used to construct a proxy score utilizing generic items probing CVD symptoms.
Mean scores differed between CHD groups for all indexes with and without adjustment (P < 0.0001 for all except MCS P = 0.018). Unadjusted group 3 versus 1 differences were about three times larger than for group 2 versus 1. Standardized differences for the proxy score were similar to those for generic indexes, and were about 1.0 for all except MCS for group 3 versus 1.
Generic indexes capture differences in HRQoL in population-based studies of CHD similarly to a score constructed from questions probing CVD-specific symptoms.
- American Heart Association. (2008). Heart disease and stroke statistics 2008 http://www.americanheart.org. Accessed 30 March 2009.
- Nowels, D., McGloin, J., Westfall, J. M., & Holcomb, S. (2005). Validation of the EQ-5D quality of life instrument in patients after myocardial infarction. Quality of Life Research, 31, 95–105. CrossRef
- Failde, I., & Ramos, I. (2000). Validity and reliability of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire in patients with coronary artery disease. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 359–365. CrossRef
- Kiebzak, G. M., Pierson, L. M., Campbell, M., & Cook, J. W. (2002). Use of the SF36 general health status survey to document health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: Effect of disease and response to coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart & Lung, 31(3), 207–213. CrossRef
- Puhan, M. A., Gaspoz, J. M., Bridevaux, P. O., Schindler, C., Ackermann-Liebrich, U., Rochat, T., & Gerbase, M. W. (2008). Comparing a disease-specific and a generic health-related quality of life instrument in subjects with asthma from the general population. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 6(15).
- Schlenk, E. A., Erlen, J. A., Dunbar-Jacob, J., McDowell, J., Engberg, S., Sereika, S. M., et al. (1998). Health-related quality of life in chronic disorders: A comparison across studies using the MOS SF-36. Quality of Life Research, 7, 57–65. CrossRef
- Heo, S., Moser, D. K., Lennie, T. A., Zambroski, C. H., & Chung, M. L. (2007). A comparison of health-related quality of life between older adults with heart failure and healthy older adults. Heart & Lung, 36, 16–24. CrossRef
- Dempster, M., & Donnelly, M. (2000). Measuring the health related quality of life of people with ischaemic heart disease. Heart, 83, 641–644. CrossRef
- Thompson, D. R., & Roebuck, A. (2001). The measurement of health-related quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 16(1), 28–33.
- Wolinsky, F. D., Wyrwich, K. W., Nienaber, N. A., & Tierney, W. M. (1998). Generic versus disease-specific health status measures. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 21(2), 216–243. CrossRef
- Marra, C. A., Woolcott, J. C., Kopec, J. A., Shojania, K., Offer, R., Brazier, J. E., et al. (2005). A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 1571–1582. CrossRef
- Hurst, N. P., Kind, P., Ruta, D., Hunter, M., & Stubbings, A. (1997). Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: Validity, responsiveness, and reliability of EuroQoL (EQ-5D). British Journal of Rheumatology, 36, 551–559. CrossRef
- Maddigan, S. L., Feeny, D. H., & Johnson, J. A. (2004). Construct validity of the RAND-12 and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and 3 in Type 2 diabetes. Quality of Life Research, 13, 435–448. CrossRef
- Grootendorst, P., Feeny, D., & Furlong, W. (2000). Health Utilities Index Mark 3: Evidence of construct validity for stroke and arthritis in a population health survey. Medical Care, 38, 290–299. CrossRef
- Bosch, J. L., & Hunink, M. G. M. (2000). Comparison of the Health Utilities Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol (EQ-5D) in patients treated for intermittent claudication. Quality of Life Research, 9, 591–601. CrossRef
- Rector, T. S., Kubo, S. H., & Cohn, J. N. (1993). Validity of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire as a measure of therapeutic response to enalapril or placebo. American Journal of Cardiology, 71(12), 1106–1107. CrossRef
- Spertus, J. A., Winder, J. A., Dewhurst, T. A., Deyo, R. A., Prodzinski, J., McDonell, M., et al. (1995). Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 25(2), 333–341. CrossRef
- Thompson, D. R., & Yu, C. M. (2003). Quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease-I: Assessment tools. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(1).
- Fryback, D. G., Dunham, N. C., Palta, M., Hanmer, J., Buechner, J., Cherepanov, D., et al. (2007). U.S. norms for six Generic Health-related Quality of Life Indexes from the National Health Measurement Study. Medical Care, 45(12), 1162–1170. CrossRef
- Ware, J. E. (2000). SF-36 health survey update. Spine, 25(24), 3130–3139. CrossRef
- Feeny, D., Torrance, G., & Furlong, W. (1996). Health utilities index. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott–Raven.
- Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Torrance, G. W., et al. (2002). Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40, 113–128. CrossRef
- Rabin, R., & de Charro, F. (2001). EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Annals of Internal Medicine, 33, 337–343.
- Andresen, E. M., Rothenberg, B. M., & Kaplan, R. M. (1998). Performance of a self- administered mailed version of the Quality of Well-Being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults. Medical Care, 36, 1349–1360. CrossRef
- Erickson, P. (1998). Evaluation of a population-based measure of quality of life: The Health and Activity Limitation Index (HALex). Quality of Life Research, 7, 101–114. CrossRef
- Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21, 271–292. CrossRef
- Guyatt, G. H. (1993). Measurement of health-related quality of life in heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 22(4), 185A–191A. CrossRef
- Horsman, J., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., & Torrance, G. (2003). The health utilities index (HUI): Concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(54).
- Dhingra, R., Sesso, H. D., Kenchaiah, S., & Gaziano, J. M. (2008). Differential effects of lipids on the risk of heart failure and coronary heart disease: The Physicians’ Health Study. American Heart Journal, 155(5), 869–875. CrossRef
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
- Kaplan, R. M. (2005). The minimally clinically important difference in generic utility-based measures. COPD, 2(1), 91–97. CrossRef
- Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A user’s manual. Boston, MA: Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
- Heckbert, S. R., Kooperberg, C., Safford, M. M., Psaty, B. M., Hsia, J., McTiernan, A., et al. (2004). Comparison of self-report, hospital discharge codes, and adjudication of cardiovascular events in the Women’s Health Initiative. American Journal of Epidemiology, 160(12), 1152–1158.
- Blumberg, S. J., Luke, J. V., & Cynamon, M. L. (2006). Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: Evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 926–931. CrossRef
- Measuring health-related quality of life in population-based studies of coronary heart disease: comparing six generic indexes and a disease-specific proxy score
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Quality of Life Research
Volume 18, Issue 9 , pp 1239-1247
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Generic index
- Disease-specific index
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WARF Office Building Room 707, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI, 53726, USA
- 2. Department of Medicine, Heart Failure Program, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, E5/582 CSC Mail Code 5710, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA
- 3. Department of Health Services, University of California Los Angeles School of Public Health, Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA