Concordance of cancer patients’ function, symptoms, and supportive care needs
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Although patients’ function, symptoms, and supportive care needs are obviously related, a better understanding of these relationships could improve patient management.
In this cross-sectional, observational study, 117 cancer patients completed the Supportive Care Needs Survey-34 and EORTC-QLQ-C30. Each symptom and function domain from the EORTC-QLQ-C30 was dichotomized (high vs. low) using a cut-off of reference sample mean scores. Each need domain was dichotomized using a cut-off of an average score representing an unmet need. We explored within-patient patterns of function, symptom, and need domains using latent class analysis. Based on these patterns, patients were categorized as high versus low function; high versus low symptom; and high versus low need. We examined the concordance between categorizations of patients’ function, symptoms, and needs.
The categorizations of function, symptoms, and needs were concordant for 66 patients (56%). Among patients with deficits in at least one area (n = 68), categorizations for 51 patients (75%) were discordant.
About 50% of patients have similar classifications of their level of function, symptoms, and needs, but discordance was common among patients with deficits in at least one area, emphasizing the importance of assessing all of these outcomes as part of patient evaluations.
- Solano, J. P., Gomes, B., & Higginson, I. J. (2006). A comparison of symptom prevalence in far advanced cancer, AIDS, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and renal disease. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 31, 58–69. CrossRef
- Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA, 273, 59–65. CrossRef
- Whelan, T. J., Mohide, E. A., Willan, A. R., et al. (1997). The supportive care needs of newly diagnosed cancer patients attending a regional cancer center. Cancer, 80, 1518–1524. CrossRef
- Snyder, C. F., Garrett-Mayer, E., Brahmer, J. R., et al. (2008). Symptoms, supportive care needs, and function in cancer patients: How are they related? Quality of Life Research, 17, 665–677. CrossRef
- McLachlan, S.-A., Allenby, A., Matthews, J., et al. (2001). Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessment versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19, 4117–4125.
- Velikova, G., Brown, J. M., Smith, A. B., et al. (2002). Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor-patient interactions in oncology. British Journal of Cancer, 86, 51–59. CrossRef
- Detmar, S. B., & Aaronson, N. K. (1998). Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: A feasibility study. European Journal of Cancer, 34, 1181–1186. CrossRef
- Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., et al. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communications. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 288, 3027–3034. CrossRef
- Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22, 714–724. CrossRef
- Snyder, C. F., Dy, S. M., Hendricks, D. E., et al. (2007). Asking the right questions: Investigating needs assessments and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires for use in oncology clinical practice. Supportive Care in Cancer, 15, 1075–1085. CrossRef
- Bonevski, B., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Girgis, A., et al. (2000). Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Cancer, 88, 217–225. CrossRef
- Sanson-Fisher, R., Girgis, A., Boyes, A., et al. (2000). The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer, 88, 226–237. CrossRef
- Aaronson, N. K., Cull, A. M., & Kaasa, S. (1996). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology: An update. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (2nd ed., pp. 179–189). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
- Fayers, P. M., Weeden, S., Curran, D., on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. (1998). EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values. Brussels: EORTC (ISBN: 2-930064-11-0).
- McCutcheon, A. L. (1987). Latent class analysis. Quantitative applications in the social sciences series No. 64. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Clogg, C. C. (1995). Latent class models. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences, (Chapter 6 (pp. 311–359). New York: Plenum Press.
- Formann, A. K. (1996). Latent class analysis in medical research. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 5, 179–211. CrossRef
- Newell, S., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Girgis, A., et al. (1998). How well do medical oncologists’ perceptions reflect their patients’ reported physical and psychosocial problems? Data from a survey of five oncologists. Cancer, 83, 1640–1651. CrossRef
- Concordance of cancer patients’ function, symptoms, and supportive care needs
Quality of Life Research
Volume 18, Issue 8 , pp 991-998
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Health-related quality of life
- Supportive care needs
- Clinical practice
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 624 N. Broadway, Room 657, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- 2. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- 3. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA