Sampling in population-based cancer caregivers research
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Awareness that cancer impacts not only the person with the disease but also the family has increased, yet existing data provide limited information, primarily because of reliance on small geographically restricted samples. The current study used population-based sampling to develop a formula to compute the probability of survivors completing a survivor survey and nominating their family caregivers.
Eleven SEER/NPCR state cancer registries participated in the American Cancer Society Study of Cancer Survivors survey, providing information about the survivors, including their age, race/ethnicity, gender, type of cancer, and stage of cancer. A total of 19,294 cancer survivors met the inclusion criteria (≥18 years old and diagnosed with one of the 10 common cancers).
Approximately 30% of survivors identified from state cancer registries completed the survivor survey, of whom 42% nominated a caregiver. Logistic regression analysis revealed that middle-aged, female, or non-black survivors and survivors diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer were more likely to complete the survey and nominate a caregiver, whereas survivors with bladder or lung cancer and survivors with advanced-stage cancer were less likely to complete the survey and nominate a caregiver.
Using the formula based on the logistic regression analysis results, a number of certain groups of survivors to be recruited from state registry can be calculated in order to have a present number of caregivers to contact for participation into a caregiver study. This is practical and valuable information, which fosters research that uses state cancer registries and increases the generalizability of findings to multiple types of cancer and different stages of cancer.
- Horner, M. J., Ries, L. A. G., Krapcho, M., Neyman, N., Aminou, R., Howlader, N., Altekruse, S. F., Feuer. E. J., Huang. L., Mariotto, A., Miller, B. A., Lewis, D. R., Eisner, M. P., Stinchcomb, D. G., Edwards, B. K. (Eds). SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2006. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/, based on November 2008 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2009.
- American Cancer Society. (2009). Cancer facts and figures, 2009. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.
- U.S. Bureau of the Census. American Community Survey, U S Bureau of the Census 2005. www.census.gov/acs/www/index.html. Accessed 8 Jan 2007.
- Kim, Y., & Given, B. A. (2008). Quality of life of family caregivers of cancer survivors across the trajectory of the illness. Cancer, Suppl 112(11), 2556–2568. CrossRef
- Bowman, K. F., Rose, J. H., & Deimling, G. T. (2005). Families of long-term cancer survivors: Health maintenance advocacy and practice. Psycho-Oncololgy, 14(12), 1008–1017. CrossRef
- Nijboer, C., Tempelaar, R., Sanderman, R., Triemstra, M., Spruijt, R. J., & van den Bos, G. A. (1998). Cancer and caregiving: The impact on the caregiver’s health. Psycho-Oncology, 7(1), 3–13. CrossRef
- Pasacreta, J. V., & McCorkle, R. (2000). Cancer care: Impact of interventions on caregiver outcomes. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 18, 127–148.
- Weitzner, M. A., Haley, W. E., & Chen, H. (2000). The family caregiver of the older cancer patient. Hematology/oncology Clinics of North America, 14(1), 269–281. CrossRef
- Hewitt, M., & Simone, J. V. (1999). Ensuring quality cancer care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Steinglass, P. (1998). Multiple family discussion groups for patients with chronic medical illness. Families, Systems and Health, 16(1&2), 55–71. CrossRef
- Gonzalez, S., & Steinglass, P. (2002). Application of multifamily groups in chronic medical disorders. In W. F. McFarlane (Ed.), Multifamily groups in the treatment of severe psychiatric disorders (pp. 315–340). New York, NY: Guilford.
- Ostroff, J., Ross, S., Steinglass, P., Ronis-Tobin, V., & Singh, B. (2004). Interest in and barriers to participation in multiple family groups among head and neck cancer survivors and their primary family caregivers. Family Process, 43(2), 195–208. CrossRef
- Kazak, A., Prusak, A., McSherry, M., et al. (2001). The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT): Pilot data on a brief screening instrument for identifying high risk families in pediatric oncology. Families, Systems and Health, 19, 303–317. CrossRef
- Shelby, R. A., Taylor, K. L., Kerner, J. F., Coleman, E., & Blum, D. (2002). The role of community-based and philanthropic organizations in meeting cancer patient and caregiver needs. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 52(4), 229–246. CrossRef
- Baker, F., Denniston, M., Smith, T., & West, M. M. (2005). Adult cancer survivors: How are they faring? Cancer, 104(11 Suppl), 2565–2576. CrossRef
- Cohen, J. (1977). The concepts of power analysis. In J. Cohen (Ed.), Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–17). New York: Academic Press.
- Beskow, L. M., Sandler, R. S., & Weinberger, M. (2006). Research recruitment through US central cancer registries: Balancing privacy and scientific issues. American Journal of Public Health, 96(11), 1920–1926. CrossRef
- Cooper, G. S., Yuan, Z., Stange, K. C., Dennis, L. K., Amini, S. B., & Rimm, A. A. (2000). Agreement of Medicare claims and tumor registry data for assessment of cancer-related treatment. Medical Care, 38(4), 411–421. CrossRef
- Sisler, J. J., Brown, J. B., & Stewart, M. (2004). Family physicians’ roles in cancer care. Survey of patients on a provincial cancer registry. Canadian Family Physician, 50, 889–896.
- Engel, J., Kerr, J., Schlesinger-Raab, A., Eckel, R., Sauer, H., & Holzel, D. (2003). Comparison of breast and rectal cancer patients’ quality of life: Results of a four year prospective field study. European journal of cancer care, 12(3), 215–223. CrossRef
- Potosky, A. L., Harlan, L. C., Stanford, J. L., et al. (1999). Prostate cancer practice patterns and quality of life: The prostate cancer outcomes study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 91(20), 1719–1724. CrossRef
- Crowley, R., & Casarett, D. (2003). Patients’ willingness to participate in symptom-related and disease-modifying research: Results of a research screening initiative in a palliative care clinic. Cancer, 97(9), 2327–2333. CrossRef
- Mellon, S., Northouse, L. L., & Weiss, L. K. (2006). A population-based study of the quality of life of cancer survivors and their family caregivers. Cancer Nursing, 29(2), 120–131. CrossRef
- Smith, T., Stein, K. D., Mehta, C. C., et al. (2007). The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society’s studies of cancer survivors. Cancer, 109(1), 1–12. CrossRef
- Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied logistic regression. New York, NY: Wiley.
- Cantor, R. C. (1979). Self-esteem, sexuality and cancer-related stress. Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, 14, 51–54.
- Messeri, P., Silverstein, M., & Litwak, E. (1993). Choosing optimal support groups: A review and reformulation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34(2), 122–137. CrossRef
- Litwak, E. (1985). Complementary roles for formal and informal support groups: A study of nursing homes and mortality rates. The Journal of applied behavioral science, 21(4), 407–425. CrossRef
- Allen, S. M., Goldscheider, F., & Ciambrone, D. A. (1999). Gender roles, marital intimacy, and nomination of spouse as primary caregiver. Gerontologist, 39(2), 150–158.
- Sampling in population-based cancer caregivers research
Quality of Life Research
Volume 18, Issue 8 , pp 981-989
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Population-based research
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
- 2. Department of Psychology, University of Miami, 5665 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Coral Gables, FL, 33124-0751, USA
- 3. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA