Clarifying quality of life assessment: do theoretical models capture the underlying cognitive processes?
Abstract
Objective
To develop an analysis scheme capturing the cognitive processes underlying QoL assessment to increase our understanding on how to interpret responses to QoL items. Tourangeau et al.’s (The psychology of survey response, 2000) and Rapkin and Schwartz’ (Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:14, 2004) cognitive process models form the basis for this analysis scheme.
Methods
We conducted think aloud interviews with six cancer patients prior to and following radiotherapy to elicit the cognitive processes underlying the assessment of 7 EORTC QLQ-C30 items. Content analysis was carried out by two to four researchers independently. Eighty text fragments were analyzed inductively and combined in an iterative process with deductive analyses based on both models.
Results
We have developed a comprehensive analysis scheme feasible for analyzing the cognitive processes underlying QoL assessment qualitatively. All cognitive components of both models could be distinguished in our data. The cognitive component ‘reporting and response selection’ needed extension to fully capture the cognitive processes used.
Conclusion
The two models combined are useful in describing the cognitive processes cancer patients use in answering QoL items, and as such facilitate insight into patients’ self-reported QoL assessments. Interestingly, the content of the cognitive processes not only differed between patients but also between items within patients and over time.
- Gill, TM, Feinstein, AR (1994) A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. Journal of the American Medical Association 272: pp. 619-626 CrossRef
- Revicki, DA (2007) Regulatory issues and patient-reported outcomes task force for the international society for quality of life research FDA draft guidance and health-outcomes research. Lancet 369: pp. 540-542 CrossRef
- Bottomley, A, Vanvoorden, V, Flechtner, H, Therasse, P (2003) The challenges and achievements involved in implementing Quality of Life research in cancer clinical trails. European Journal of Cancer 39: pp. 275-285 CrossRef
- Osoba, D (1992) The Quality of Life Committee of the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada: Organization and functions. Quality of Life Research 1: pp. 211-218 CrossRef
- Barofsky, I (2003) Cognitive approaches to summary measurement: Its application to the measurement of diversity in health-related quality of life assessments. Quality of Life Research 12: pp. 251-260 CrossRef
- Cannell, D, Miller, P, Oksenberg, L Research on interviewing techniques. In: Leinhardt, S eds. (1981) Sociological methodology. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 389-437
- Krosnick, JA, Alwin, D (1987) An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly 51: pp. 201-219 CrossRef
- Strack, F, Martin, L Thinking, judging and communicating: A process account of context effects in attitude surveys. In: Hippler, H, Schwartz, N, Sudman, S eds. (1987) Social information processing and survey methodology. Springer, New York, pp. 123-148
- Tourangeau, R, Rips, LJ, Rasinski, K (2000) The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press, New York
- Rapkin, BD, Schwartz, CE (2004) Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2: pp. 14 CrossRef
- Wyrwich, KW, Tardino, VM (2006) Understanding global transition assessments. Quality of Life Research 15: pp. 995-1004 CrossRef
- Aaronson, NK, Ahmedzai, SA, Bergman, B (1993) A quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 85: pp. 365-376 CrossRef
- Hak, T., van der Veer, K., & Jansen, H. (2002). The Three-Step Test-Interview (TSTI): An observational instrument for pre-testing self-completion questionnaires. Paper for the International Conference on Questionnaire Development, Evaluation and Testing Methods (QDET).
- Willis, GB (2005) Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, California
- Tong, A, Sainsbury, P, Craig, J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19: pp. 349-357 CrossRef
- Padilla, GV, Ferrell, B, Grant, MM, Rhiner, M (1990) Defining the content domain of quality of life for cancer patients with pain. Cancer Nursing 13: pp. 108-115 CrossRef
- Groves, RM, Fultz, NH, Martin, E Direct questioning about comprehension in a survey setting. In: Tanur, JM eds. (1994) Questions about questions. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 49-61
- Borawski, EA, Kinney, JM, Kahana, E (1996) The meaning of older adults’ health appraisals: Congruence with health status and determinant of mortality. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 51B: pp. S157-S170
- Montazeri, A, Milroy, R, Gillis, CR, McEwen, J (1996) Quality of life: Perception of lung cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer 32: pp. 2284-2289 CrossRef
- Archenholtz, B, Burckhardt, CS, Segesten, K (1999) Quality of life of women with systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis: Domains of importance and dissatisfaction. Quality of Life Research 8: pp. 411-416 CrossRef
- Kaplan, G, Baron-Epel, O (2003) What lies behind the subjective evaluation of health status?. Social Science and Medicine 56: pp. 1669-1676 CrossRef
- Title
- Clarifying quality of life assessment: do theoretical models capture the underlying cognitive processes?
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
- Journal
-
Quality of Life Research
Volume 17, Issue 8 , pp 1093-1102
- Cover Date
- 2008-10-01
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11136-008-9380-z
- Print ISSN
- 0962-9343
- Online ISSN
- 1573-2649
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Topics
- Keywords
-
- Cancer
- Cognitive processes
- Cognitive interviews
- Quality of life
- Qualitative research
- Industry Sectors
- Authors
-
-
Elsbeth F. Bloem
(1)
- Florence J. van Zuuren (2)
- Margot A. Koeneman (1)
- Bruce D. Rapkin (3) (4)
- Mechteld R. M. Visser (5)
- Caro C. E. Koning (6)
- Mirjam A. G. Sprangers (1)
-
Elsbeth F. Bloem
- Author Affiliations
-
- 1. Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 2. Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 3. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- 4. Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- 5. Department of Family Practice, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 6. Department of Radiotherapy, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands