Quality of Life Research

, Volume 16, Supplement 1, pp 175–186

Enhancing measurement in health outcomes research supported by Agencies within the US Department of Health and Human Services

  • Bryce B. Reeve
  • Laurie B. Burke
  • Yen-pin Chiang
  • Steven B. Clauser
  • Lisa J. Colpe
  • Jeffrey W. Elias
  • John Fleishman
  • Ann A. Hohmann
  • Wendy L. Johnson-Taylor
  • William Lawrence
  • Claudia S. Moy
  • Louis A. Quatrano
  • William T. Riley
  • Barbara A. Smothers
  • Ellen M. Werner
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9190-8

Cite this article as:
Reeve, B.B., Burke, L.B., Chiang, Y. et al. Qual Life Res (2007) 16: 175. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9190-8

Abstract

Many of the Institutes, Agencies and Centers that make up the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) have recognized the need for better instrumentation in health outcomes research, and provide support, both internally and externally, for research utilizing advances in measurement theory and computer technology (informatics). In this paper, representatives from several DHHS agencies and institutes will discuss their need for better instruments within their discipline and describe current or future initiatives for exploring the benefits of these technologies. Together, the perspectives underscore the importance of developing valid, precise, and efficient measures to capture the full burden of disease and treatment on patients. Initiatives, like the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to create health-related quality of life item banks, represent a trans-DHHS effort to develop a standard set of measures for informing decision making in clinical research, practice, and health policy.

Keywords

Item response theoryComputerized-adaptive testingPatient-reported outcomesHealth-related quality of life

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bryce B. Reeve
    • 1
  • Laurie B. Burke
    • 2
  • Yen-pin Chiang
    • 3
  • Steven B. Clauser
    • 1
  • Lisa J. Colpe
    • 4
  • Jeffrey W. Elias
    • 5
  • John Fleishman
    • 3
  • Ann A. Hohmann
    • 6
  • Wendy L. Johnson-Taylor
    • 7
  • William Lawrence
    • 3
  • Claudia S. Moy
    • 8
  • Louis A. Quatrano
    • 9
    • 10
  • William T. Riley
    • 6
  • Barbara A. Smothers
    • 11
  • Ellen M. Werner
    • 12
  1. 1.Outcomes Research Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population SciencesNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Food and Drug AdministrationRockvilleUSA
  3. 3.Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityRockvilleUSA
  4. 4.National Institutes of Health (Currently at Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration)RockvilleUSA
  5. 5.National Institute on AgingBethesdaUSA
  6. 6.National Institute of Mental HealthBethesdaUSA
  7. 7.Division of Nutrition Research CoordinationBethesdaUSA
  8. 8.National Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeBethesdaUSA
  9. 9.National Center for Medical Rehabilitation ResearchBethesdaUSA
  10. 10.National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentBethesdaUSA
  11. 11.National Institute of Nursing ResearchBethesdaUSA
  12. 12.National Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteBethesdaUSA