Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The increasing recognition of the patient perspective and, more specifically, functioning and health, has led to an impressive effort in research to develop concepts and instruments to measure them. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) represent two different perspectives from which to look at functioning and health. Therefore, it is expected that both will often be used concurrently in clinical practice, research and health reporting. The objective of our study was to examine the relationship between six HRQOL instruments (the SF-36, the NHP, the QL-I, the WHOQOL-BREF, the WHODASII and the EQ-5D) and the ICF. All six HRQOL instruments were linked to the ICF separately by two trained health professionals according to ten linking rules developed specifically for this purpose. The degree of agreement between health professionals was calculated by means of the kappa statistic. Bootstrapped confidence intervals were calculated. In the 148 items of the 6 instruments a total of 226 concepts were identified and linked to the ICF. The estimated kappa coefficients range between 0.82 and 0.98. The concepts contained in the items of the HRQOL instruments were linked to 91 different ICF categories, 17 categories of the component body functions, 60 categories of the component activities and participation, and 14 categories of the component environmental factors. Twelve concepts could not be linked to the ICF at all. In the component body functions, only emotional functions are covered by all examined instruments. In the component activities and participation, all instruments cover aspects of work, but the half of them scarcely cover aspects of mobility. Only four of the six instruments address environmental factors. The ICF proved highly useful for the comparison of HRQOL instruments. The comparison of selected HRQOL instruments may provide clinicians and researchers with new insights when selecting health-status measures for clinical studies.
- Spilker B. Introduction. In: Spilker B. (ed), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical trials, 2nd ed, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996; 1–10.
- Ware, JE, Sherbourne, CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). A. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 30: pp. 473-483
- Hunt, SM, McEwen, J, McKenna, SP (1985) Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract 35: pp. 185-188
- World Health Organization. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODASII). Training Manual: a guide to administration. Geneva: WHO (2000) Retrieved April 9, 2003, from <http://www.who.int/icidh/whodas/>.
- Euroqol-a facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16: pp. 199-208
- International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. WHO, ICF. Geneva
- Stucki, G, Cieza, A, Ewert, T, Kostanjsek, N, Chatterji, S, Uestuen, TB (2002) Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disability and Rehabilitation 24: pp. 281-282 CrossRef
- Cieza, A, Brockow, T, Ewert, T, Amman, E, Kollerits, B, Chatterji, S, Bedirhan Üstün, B, Stucki, G (2002) Linking Health-Status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Rehabil Med 34: pp. 1-6
- International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps: ICIDH. WHO, Geneva
- Stucki, G, Ewert, T, Cieza, A (2002) Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disability and Rehabili tation 24: pp. 932-938
- Doyle, PJ (2002) Measuring health outcomes in stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83: pp. S39-S43
- Harwood, RH, Gompertz, P, Ebrahim, S (1994) Handicap one year after a stroke: validity of a new scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57: pp. 825-829
- Spitzer, WO, Dobson, AJ, Hall, J (1981) Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: A concise QL-index for use by physicians. J Chronic Dis 34: pp. 585-597
- The WHOQOL Group The development of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment instrument (the WHOQOL). In: Orley J and Kuyken W (eds), Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag ,1994.
- Williams, A (1995) The measurement and valuation of health: a chronicle. University of York, York
- Brook R with the EuroQol group. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37: 53–72; Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997; 35: 1095–108.
- Cohen, J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20: pp. 37-46
- Vierkant RA (2000). A SAS macro for calculating bootstrapped confidence intervals about a kappa coefficient. SAS Users Group International Online Proceedings. Retrieved July 23, 2004, from <http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi22/STATS/PAPER295.PDF>.
- Weigl, M, Cieza, A, Harder, M, Geyh, S, Amann, E, Kostanjsek, N, Stucki, G (2003) Linking osteoarthritis-specific health-status measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 11: pp. 519-523
- Kessler, RC, Mroczek, DK (1995) Measuring the effects of medical interventions. Med Care 33: pp. 109-119
- McHorney, CA (1997) Generic health measurement: Past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century. Ann Intern Med 15: pp. 743-750
- Waltz, M, Kriegel, W, van’tPad Bosch, P (1998) The social environment and health in rheumatoid arthritis: Marital quality predicts individual variability in pain severity. Arthritis Care Res 11: pp. 356-374
- Kirwan, J, Heiberg, T, Hewlett, S (2003) Outcomes from the Patient Perspective Workshop at OMERACT 6. J Rheumatol 30: pp. 868-872
- Johansson, U, Bernspang, B (2003) Life satisfaction related to work re-entry after brain injury: A longitudinal study. Brain Inj 17: pp. 991-1002
- Vestling, M, Tufvesson, B, Iwarsson, S (2003) Indicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction. J Rehabil Med 35: pp. 127-131
- Avlund, K, Lund, R, Holstein, BE, Due, P (2004) Social relations as determinant of onset of disability in aging. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 38: pp. 85-99
- Travis, LA, Lyness, JM, Shields, CG, King, DA, Cox, C (2004) Social support, depression, and functional disability in older adult primary-care patients. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 12: pp. 265-271
- Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)
Quality of Life Research
Volume 14, Issue 5 , pp 1225-1237
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Content validity
- Generic instruments
- Health-related quality of life (HRQOL)
- Health status measures
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. ICF Research Branch, WHO FIC Collaborating Center (DIMDI), IMBK, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
- 2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
- 3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany