Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deprived or not deprived? Comparing the measured extent of material deprivation using the UK government’s and the Poverty and Social Exclusion surveys’ method of calculating material deprivation

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Poverty can either be measured directly, through standards of living such as material deprivation, or indirectly through resources available, usually income. Research shows that the optimum measure of poverty combines these methods, a fact that the UK government took cognisance of in its tripartite measure of child poverty. For use in a birth cohort study, two methods of calculating material deprivation were tested: the method used by the UK government taken from the Family Resources Survey (FRS), and the methods used in the Poverty and Social Exclusion (PSE) study at Bristol University. Results show that the former measure, compared to the latter measure, underestimates the depth and extent of material deprivation among families with young children in Scotland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock, P.: Understanding Poverty. Macmillan, Basingstoke (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M., Chanfreau, J., Tomaszewski, W.: Growing up in Scotland: The Circumstances of Persistently Poor Children. Scottish Government, Edinburgh (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Finch, N.: Overlaps in dimensions of poverty. J. Soc. Policy 32, 513–525 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, P., Marryat, L., Corbett, J., Ferrandon, M., Tipping, S.: Growing up In Scotland Sweep 4: 2008–2009: User Guide. Scottish Government, Edinburgh (2009)

  • Callan, T., Nolan, B., Whelan, C.T.: Resources, deprivation and the measurement of poverty. J. Soc. Policy 22, 141–172 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanfreau, J., Burchardt, T.: Equivalence scales: rationales, uses and assumptions. Scottish Government, Edinburgh (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M., Shah, A.: An econometric approach to the measurement of poverty. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 40, 505–522 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselli, E.E., Campbell, J.P., Zedeck, S.: Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., Pantazis, C.: Breadline Britain in the 1990s. Ashgate, Aldershot (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Government, S.: Poverty and income inequality in Scotland: 2008–09. In: Statistics, N. (ed) Scottish Government, Edinburgh (2010)

  • Harris, J., Treanor, M.C., Sharma, N.: Below the Breadline: A Year in the Life of Families Living in Poverty. Barnardos, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • HBAI.: Households Below Average Income: An analysis of the income distribution 1994/5–2010/11. In: Adams, N., Carr, J., Collins, J., Johnson, G., Matejic, P. (eds) London, Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2012)

  • Kline, T.: Psychological Testing: A Practical Approach To Design And Evaluation. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R.: Poverty. Polity, Malden (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, J., Lansley, S.: Poor Britain. G. Allen & Unwin, Oxford (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckay, S.: Poverty or preference: what do ‘consensual deprivation indicators’ really mean? Fiscal Stud. 25, 201–223 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantazis, C., Gordon, D., Levitas, R.: Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain: The Millennium Survey. Policy Press, Bristol (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Piachaud, D.: Children and Poverty. Child Poverty Action Group, London (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringen, S.: Direct and indirect measures of poverty. J. Soc. Policy 17, 351–365 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scotcen, : Growing up in Scotland Sweep 4–2008/09 Data Documentation. Scottish Centre for Social Research, Edinburgh (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N., Middleton, S.: A Review of Poverty Dynamics Research in the UK. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P.: Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P.: Deprivation. J. Soc. Policy 16, 125–146 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, C.T., Layte, R., Maitre, B.: Understanding the mismatch between income poverty and deprivation: A dynamic comparative analysis. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 20, 287–302 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) for the funding for my PhD (award number ES/HO13008/1) at the University of Edinburgh. I would like to thank my supervisors, Professor Kay Tisdall and Dr. Paul Norris for their support. I would also like to give my special thanks to Professor David Gordon for providing me with the details on how to undertake the analysis using the PSE method pioneered at Bristol University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morag C. Treanor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Treanor, M.C. Deprived or not deprived? Comparing the measured extent of material deprivation using the UK government’s and the Poverty and Social Exclusion surveys’ method of calculating material deprivation. Qual Quant 48, 1337–1346 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9838-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9838-0

Keywords

Navigation