Quality & Quantity

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 387–408

Beyond the existence proof: ontological conditions, epistemological implications, and in-depth interview research

Authors

    • Department of SociologyUniversity of California-Berkeley
Open AccessArticle

DOI: 10.1007/s11135-012-9775-3

Cite this article as:
Lucas, S.R. Qual Quant (2014) 48: 387. doi:10.1007/s11135-012-9775-3

Abstract

In-depth interviewing is a promising method. Alas, traditional in-depth interview sample designs prohibit generalizing. Yet, after acknowledging this limitation, in-depth interview studies generalize anyway. Generalization appears unavoidable; thus, sample design must be grounded in plausible ontological and epistemological assumptions that enable generalization. Many in-depth interviewers reject such designs. The paper demonstrates that traditional sampling for in-depth interview studies is indefensible given plausible ontological conditions, and engages the epistemological claims that purportedly justify traditional sampling. The paper finds that the promise of in-depth interviewing will go unrealized unless interviewers adopt ontologically plausible sample designs. Otherwise, in-depth interviewing can only provide existence proofs, at best.

Keywords

Ontology Epistemology In-depth interviewing Sampling Probability sampling Non-probability sampling Snowball sampling Purposive sampling Theoretical sampling

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012