How to Improve the Efficiency of Randomised Response Designs Article DOI:
10.1007/s11135-004-0432-3 Cite this article as: Lensvelt-Mulders, G.J.L.M., Hox, J.J. & Heijden, P.G.M... Qual Quant (2005) 39: 253. doi:10.1007/s11135-004-0432-3 Abstract
This paper describes ways to maximise the efficiency of randomised response designs. When randomised response designs become more efficient their value as a tool to study sensitive topics will increase. An overview of the literature shows that when sensitive or incriminating topics are studied, the overall results of randomised response studies are more valid than the results of direct question designs. This positive effect is small, however, and randomised response designs are known to be less efficient than direct question designs, making it necessary to recruit larger samples. In this paper the efficiency of six randomised response methods (Warner’s design, both forms of the unrelated question technique, the forced response technique, Moors’s design and Mangat’s improved model) will be compared relative to direct question designs. Using the right design parameters we can make randomised response studies up to twice as efficient. The forced response method and a special form of the unrelated question design are the most efficient designs until now.
Keywords Randomised response Power Sensitive questions Validity Reliability Sample-size References Antonak, R.F., Livneh, H. 1995 Randomised response technique: A review and proposed extension to disability attitude research Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 121 97 145 Google Scholar Boeije, H., Lensvelt-Mulders, G.J.L.M. 2002 Honest by chance: A qualitative interview study to clarify respondents’ (non-)compliance with computer assisted randomised response Bulletin Methodologie Sociologique 75(July) 24 39 Google Scholar Boruch, R.F. 1971 Assuring confidentiality of responses in social research: A note on strategies The American Sociologist 6(November) 308 311 Google Scholar Chaudhuri, A., Mukerjee, R. 1988Randomized response: Theory and techniques Marcel Dekker New York Google Scholar Clark, S.J., Desharnais, R.A. 1998 Honest answers to embarrassing questions: Detecting cheating in the randomised response model Psychological Methods 3 160 168 CrossRef Google Scholar Finkelhor, D., Lewis, I.A. 1988 An epidemiological approach to the study of child molestation Annals of the New York Academy of Science. 14 19 40 Google Scholar Fisher, M., Kupferman, L.B., Lesser, M. 1992 Substance use in a school-based clinic population: Use of the randomised response technique to estimate prevalence Journal of Adolescent Health 13 281 285 PubMed Google Scholar Fox, J.A., Tracy, P.E. 1986Randomised Response: A Method for Sensitive Surveys Sage Publications Beverly Hills Google Scholar Greenberg, B.V., Abdul-Ela, A.A., Simmons, W.R., Horvitz, D.G. 1969 The unrelated question randomised response model: Theoretical framework Journal of the American Statistical Association 66 243 250 Google Scholar Greenberg, B.G., Kuebler, R.R., Abernathy, J.R., Horvitz, D.G. 1971 Application of the randomised response technique in obtaining quantitative data Journal of the American Statistical Association 66 243 248 Google Scholar Heijden, P.G.M.v.d., Gils, G.v. 1996 Some logistic regression models for randomised response data Forcina, A Marcheti, G.M. Hatzinger, r. Galmatti, G eds. Statistical modeling. Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Statistical Modeling. Orvieto Italy 341 348 Google Scholar Heijden, P.G.M.v.d., Gils, G.v., Bouts, J., Hox, J. 1998 A comparison of randomised response, CASAQ, and direct questioning; eliciting sensitive information in the context of fraud Kwantitatieve Methoden 19 15 34 Google Scholar Horvitz, D.G., Shah, B.V., Simmons, W.R. 1967The unrelated question randomised response model Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section ASA. 65 72 Google Scholar
Jarman, B. J. (1997). The Prevalence and Precedence of Socially Condoned Sexual agression Within a Dating Context as Measured by Direct Questioning and the Randomised response Technique.
Kendall, M.K., Stuart, A. 1979The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2 Macmillan New York. Google Scholar Kuk, A.Y.C. 1990 Asking sensitive questions indirectly Biometrika 77 436 438 MathSciNet Google Scholar Lensvelt-Mulders, G.J.L.M., Hox, J.J., Heijden, P.G.M., Maas, C.J.M. 2005 Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research: Thirty-Five Years of Validation Sociological Methods & Research 33 319 348 Google Scholar Maddala, G.S. 1983Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics Cambridge University Press Cambridge Google Scholar Mangat, N.S., Singh, R. 1990 An alternative randomised response procedure Biometrica 77 439 442 Google Scholar Mangat, N.S. 1994 An improved randomised response strategy Journal of the Royal Statistic society of Britain 56 93 95 Google Scholar Moors, J.J.A. 1971 Optimization of the unrelated question randomised response model Journal of the American Statistical Association 66 627 629 Google Scholar
Rasinski, K. A., Willis, G. B., Baldwin, A. K., Yeh, W., Lee, L. (1999). Methods of datacollection, perception of risks and losses, and motivation to give truthful answers to sensitive survey questions. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 465–484.
Soeken, K.L., Macready, G.B. 1982 Respondents’ perceived protection when using randomised response. psychological Bulletin 92 487 498 CrossRef Google Scholar Sudman, S., Bradburn, N.M. 1982Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design Jossey Bases San Fransisco Google Scholar Umesh, U.N., Peterson, R.A. 1991 A critical evaluation of the randomised response method Sociological Methods and Research 20 104 138 Google Scholar VanderHeijden, P.G.M., Van Gils, G., Bouts, J., Hox, J.J. 2000 A comparison of randomized response, computer-assisted self-interview, and face-to-face direct questioning Sociological Methods and Research 28 505 537 Google Scholar Volicer, B.J., Volicer, L. 1982 Randomised response technique for estimating alcohol use and non compliance in hypertensives Journal of Studies in Alcohol 43 739 750 Google Scholar Warner, S.L. 1965 Randomised response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias Journal of the American Statistical Association 60 63 69 PubMed Google Scholar Warner, S.L. 1971 The linear randomised response model Journal of the American Statistical Association 66 884 888 Google Scholar Weissman, A.N., Steer, R.A., Lipton, D.S. 1986 Estimating illicit drug use through telephone interviews and the randomised response technique Drug and Alcohol Dependence 18 225 233 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Williams, B.L., Suen, H. 1994 A methodological comparison of survey techniques in obtaining self-reports of condom-related behaviors Psychological Reports 7 1531 1537 Google Scholar