The Construction of Gender Among Working-Class Cohabiting Couples
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Utilizing three typologies that emerged from the data, we examine how 30 working-class cohabiting couples construct gender through paid and domestic labor. Contesting couples contain at least one partner, usually the woman, who attempts to construct more egalitarian arrangements. In Conventional and Counter-Conventional couples, neither partner is actively contesting their gendered arrangements. Among Conventional couples each partner adheres to a traditional division of labor. Normative gender arrangements are upended in Contesting and Counter-Conventional couples when the female partner resists financial dependence on her male partner or if or the male partner does not earn enough income to provide even for himself. Nevertheless, institutionalized gender roles appear deeply entrenched among the working-class cohabitors in this study.
- Aronson, Pamela. 2003. Feminists or ‘postfeminists’?: Young women’s attitudes toward feminism and gender relations. Gender and Society 17(5): 903–922. CrossRef
- Bianchi, Suzanne M., Melissa A. Milkie, Liana C. Sayer, and John P. Robinson. 2000. Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces 79(1): 191–228.
- Bolzendahl, Catherine, and Daniel Myers. 2004. Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Change in women and men, 1974–1998. Social Forces 83(2): 759–790. CrossRef
- Bratter, Jenifer, and Rosalind King. 2008. ‘But will it last?’ Marital instability among interracial and same-race couples. Family Relations 57(2): 160–171. CrossRef
- Brines, Julie. 1994. Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. The American Journal of Sociology 100(3): 652–688. CrossRef
- Brines, Julie, and Kara Joyner. 1999. The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review 64(3): 333–356. CrossRef
- Burawoy, Michael. 1998. The extended case method. Sociological Theory 16(1): 4–33. CrossRef
- Chandra, Anjani, Gladys M. Martinez, William D. Mosher, Joyce C. Abma, and Jo Jones. 2005. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 national survey of family growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics 23.
- Charmaz, Kathy. 1983. The grounded theory method: An explanation and interpretation. In Contemporary field research, ed. R. Emerson, 109–126. Boston: Little Brown.
- Cherlin, Andrew. 2004. The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 848–862. CrossRef
- Ciabattari, Teresa. 2004. Cohabitation and housework: The effects on marital intentions. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(1): 118–125.
- Clarkberg, Martin, Russell Stolzenberg, and Linda Waite. 1995. Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces 74(2): 609–632.
- Coltrane, Scott. 1996. Family man. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Cunningham, Mick. 2007. Influences of women’s employment on the gendered division of household labor over the life course: Evidence from a 31-year panel study. Journal of Family Issues 28(3): 422–444. CrossRef
- de Ruijter, Esther, Judith Treas, and Phillip Cohen. 2005. Outsourcing the gender factory: Living arrangements and service expenditures on female and male tasks. Social Forces 84(1): 305–322. CrossRef
- Deutsch, Francine. 1999. Halving it all: How equally shared parenting works. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Deutsch, Francine. 2007. Undoing gender. Gender and Society 21(1): 106–127. CrossRef
- Ferree, Martha Marx. 1990. Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and Family 52(4): 866–884. CrossRef
- Gerson, Kathleen. 1993. No man’s land: Men’s changing commitments to work and family. New York: Basic Books.
- Gerson, Kathleen. 2009. The unfinished revolution: How a new generation is reshaping family, work, and gender in America. Oxford University Press.
- Greenstein, Theodore. 1996. Gender ideology and perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: Effects on marital quality. Social Forces 74(3): 1029–1042.
- Hertz, Rosanna. 1995. Separate but simultaneous interviewing of husbands and wives: Making sense of their stories. Qualitative Inquiry 1(4): 429–451. CrossRef
- Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1989. The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.
- Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. 2001. Domestica: Immigrant workers cleaning and caring in the shadows of affluence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- John, Daphne, Beth Ann Shelton, and Kristen Luschen. 1995. Race, ethnicity, gender, and perceptions of fairness. Journal of Family Issues 16(3): 357–379. CrossRef
- Kennedy, Sheela, and Larry Bumpass. 2008. Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research 19: 1663–1692. CrossRef
- Kroska, Amy. 2008. Examining husband-wife differences in the meaning of family financial support. Sociological Perspectives 51(1): 63–90. CrossRef
- Lavee, Yoav, and Ruth Katz. 2002. Division of labor, perceived fairness, and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and Family 64(1): 27–39. CrossRef
- Lorber, Judith. 1994. Paradoxes of gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Martin, Patricia Yancey. 2004. Gender as a social institution. Social Forces 82(4): 1249–1273. CrossRef
- McCabe, Janice. 2005. What’s in a label? The relationship between feminist self-identification and ‘feminist’ attitudes among US women and men. Gender and Society 19(4): 480–505. CrossRef
- Miller, Amanda, and Sharon Sassler. 2010. Stability and change in the division of labor among cohabiting couples. Sociological Forum 25(4): 677–702. CrossRef
- Miller, Amanda, Sharon Sassler, and Dela Kusi-Appouh. 2011. The specter of divorce: Views from working and middle class cohabitors. Family Relations 60(5): 602–616. CrossRef
- Orrange, Robert M. 2002. Aspiring law and business professionals’ orientations to work and family life. Journal of Family Issues 23(2): 287–317. CrossRef
- Potuchek, Jean. 1997. Who supports the family? Gender and breadwinning in dual-earner marriages. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Shelley J. Correll. 2004. Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender and Society 18(4): 510–531. CrossRef
- Risman, Barbara. 1998. Gender vertigo: American families in transition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Risman, Barbara. 2009. From doing to undoing: Gender as we know it. Gender and Society 23(1): 81–84. CrossRef
- Rubin, Lillian. 1976. Worlds of pain: Life in the working class family. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
- Rubin, Lillian. 1994. Families on the fault line: America’s working class speaks about the family, the economy, race, and ethnicity. New York: Harper Collins.
- Sanchez, Laura, and Emily Kane. 1996. Women’s and men’s constructions of perceptions of housework fairness. Journal of Family Issues 17(3): 358–387. CrossRef
- Sassler, Sharon. 2004. The process of entering into cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(2): 491–506. CrossRef
- Sassler, Sharon, and Frances Goldscheider. 2004. Revisiting Jane Austen’s theory of marriage timing: Union formation among American men in the late 20th century. Journal of Family Issues 25(2): 139–166. CrossRef
- Sassler, Sharon, and Kara Joyner. 2011. Social exchange and the progression of sexual relationships in emerging adulthood. Social Forces 90(1): 223–245. CrossRef
- Sassler, Sharon, and Amanda Miller. 2011a. Class differences in cohabitation processes. Family Relations 60(2): 163–177. CrossRef
- Sassler, Sharon, and Amanda Miller. 2011b. Waiting to be asked: Gender, power, and relationship progression among cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues 32(4): 482–506. CrossRef
- Shelton, Beth, and Daphne John. 1993. Does marital status make a difference? Housework among married and cohabiting men and women. Journal of Family Issues 14(3): 401–420. CrossRef
- South, Scott, and Glenna Spitze. 1994. Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review 59(3): 327–347. CrossRef
- Strauss, Anselm, and Juliette Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Sullivan, Oriel. 2011. An end to gender display through the performance of housework? A review and reassessment of the quantitative literature using insights from the qualitative literature. Journal of Family Theory and Review 3(1): 1–13. CrossRef
- Sullivan, Oriel, and Scott Coltrane. 2008. Men’s changing contribution to housework and childcare. Discussion Paper on Changing Family Roles, Briefing paper prepared for the 11th Annual Conference of the Council on Contemporary Families, April 25–26, 2008, available at http://www.contemporaryfamilies.org/subtemplate.php?t=briefingPapers&ext=menshousework.
- Sum, Andrew, Ishwar Khatiwada, Joseph McLaughlin, and Sheila Palma. 2011. No country for young men: Declining labor market prospects for low-skilled men in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 635(1): 24–55. CrossRef
- Thornton, Arland, and Linda Young-DeMarco. 2001. Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(4): 1009–1038. CrossRef
- Tichenor, Veronica. 2005. Maintaining men’s dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles 53(3): 191–205. CrossRef
- West, Candice, and Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender and Society 1(2): 125–151. CrossRef
- The Construction of Gender Among Working-Class Cohabiting Couples
Volume 35, Issue 4 , pp 427-446
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Gender roles
- Paid work
- Working class