An Empirical Model of Advertising Dynamics
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper develops a model of dynamic advertising competition, and applies it to the problem of optimal advertising scheduling through time. In many industries we observe advertising “pulsing”, whereby firms systematically switch advertising on and off at a high-frequency. Hence, we observe periods of zero and non-zero advertising, as opposed to a steady level of positive advertising. Previous research has rationalized pulsing through two features of the sale response function: an S-shaped response to advertising, and long-run effects of current advertising on demand. Despite considerable evidence for advertising carry-over, existing evidence for non-convexities in the shape of the sales-response to advertising has been limited and, often, mixed. We show how both features can be included in a discrete choice based demand system and estimated using a simple partial maximum likelihood estimator. The demand estimates are then taken to the supply side, where we simulate the outcome of a dynamic game using the Markov perfect equilibrium (MPE) concept. Our objective is not to test for the specific game generating observed advertising levels. Rather, we wish to verify whether the use of pulsing (on and off) can be justified as an equilibrium advertising practice. We solve for the equilibrium using numerical dynamic programming methods. The flexibility provided by the numerical solution method allows us to improve on the existing literature, which typically considers only two competitors, and places strong restrictions on the demand models for which the supply side policies can be obtained. We estimate the demand model using data from the Frozen Entree product category. We find evidence for a threshold effect, which is qualitatively similar to the aforementioned S-shaped advertising response. We also show that the threshold is robust to functional form assumptions for the marginal impact of advertising on demand. Our estimates, which are obtained without imposing any supply side restrictions, imply that firms should indeed pulse in equilibrium. Predicted advertising in the MPE is higher, on average, than observed advertising. On average, the optimal advertising policies yield a moderate profit improvement over the profits under observed advertising.
- Ackerberg, D.A. (2001). “Empirically Distinguishing Informative and Prestige Effects of Advertising.” RAND Journal of Economics 32(2), 316–333.
- Assmus, G., J.U. Farley, and D.R. Lehmann. (1984). “How Advertising Affects Sales: Meta-Analysis of Econometric Results.” Journal of Marketing Research 21, 65–74.
- Baron, R. (2003). “Planning’s Top 5 Questions.” TelevisionWeek 22(12), 23–32.
- Benítez-Silva, H., G. Hall, G.J. Hitsch, G. Pauletto, and J. Rust. (2003). “A Comparison of Discrete and Parametric Approximation Methods for Continuous-State Dynamic Programming Problems.” manuscript.
- Benkard, L. (2001). “A Dynamic Analysis of the Market for Wide-bodied Commercial Aircraft.” Review of Economic Studies (forthcoming).
- Berry, S. (1994). “Estimating Discrete-Choice Models of Product Differentiation.” Rand Journal of Economics 25, 242–62.
- Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes. (1995). “Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium.” Econometrica 63(4), 841–890.
- Bronnenberg, B. (1998). “Advertising Frequency Decisions in a Discrete Markov Process Under a Budget Constraint.” Journal of Marketing Research 35, 399–406.
- Cannon, H.M., J.D. Leckenby, and A. Abernethy. (2002). “Beyond Effective Frequency: Evaluating Media Schedules Using Frequency Value Planning.” Journal of Advertising Research 42(6), 33–47.
- Chen, X. and T.G. Conley. (2001). “A New Semiparametric Spatial Model for Panel Time Series.” Journal of Econometrics 105, 59–83. CrossRef
- Chintagunta, P.K., V. Kadiyali, and N.J. Vilcassim. (1999). “Investigating Dynamic Multi-firm Market Interactions in Price and Advertising”, Management Science 45(4), 499–518.
- Chintagunta, P.K., J. Dube, and K. Yong Goh. (2005). “Beyond the Endogeneity Bias: The Effect of Unmeasured Brand Characteristics on Household-Level Brand Choice Models.” Management Science 51(2).
- Clarke, D.G. (1976). “Econometric Measurement of the Duration of Advertising Effect on Sales.” Journal of Marketing Research 13, 345–357.
- Doraszelski, U. and S. Markovich. (2003). “Advertising Dynamics and Competitive Advantage.” Working Paper, Hoover Institution.
- Doraszelski, U. and M. Satterthwaite. (2003). “Foundations of Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: Existence, Purification, and Multiplicity.” manuscript.
- Ephron, E. (2002). “Median Scheduling and Carry-over Effects: Is Adstock a Useful TV Planning Tool?” Journal of Advertising Research 42(4), 66–71.
- Erdem, T. and M.P. Keane. (1996). “Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets.” Marketing Science 15, 1–20.
- Erickson, G. (1995). “Advertising Strategies in a Dynamic Oligopoly.” Journal of Marketing Research 32, 233–237.
- Erickson, G. (2002). Dynamic Models of Advertising Competition (International Series in Quantitative Marketing, 13), 2nd edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Ericson, R. and A. Pakes. (1995). “Markov Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work.” Review of Economic Studies 62(1), 53–82
- Feinberg, F.M. (1992). “Pulsing Policies for Aggregate Advertising Models.” Marketing Science 11(3), 221–.
- Hitsch, G.J. (2004). “An Empirical Model of Optimal Dynamic Product Launch and Exit Under Demand Uncertainty.” Marketing Science (forthcoming).
- Jones, J.P. (1995). “Single-Source Research Begins to Fulfill its Promise.” Journal of Advertising Research 35(3), 9–16.
- Judd, K.L. (1998). Numerical Methods in Economics. MIT Press.
- Kingman, M. (1977). “Admen See Pulsing as Way to Beat Soaring TV Time Costs.” Advertising Age 48(27), 27–29.
- Krugman, H.E. (1972). “Why Three Exposures May be Enough.” Journal of Advertising Research 12, 11–14.
- Leckenby, J.D. and J.D. Kim. (1994). “How Media Directors View Reach/Frequency Estimation: Now and a Decade Ago.” Journal of Advertising Research 34(5), 9–21.
- Leeflang, P.S.H. and D.R. Wittink. (1992). “Diagnosing Competitive Reactions Using (Aggregated) Scanner Data.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 9, 39–57. CrossRef
- Leeflang, P.S.H. and D.R. Wittink. (1996). “Competitive Reaction Versus Consumer Response: Do Managers Overreact?” International Journal of Research in Marketing 13, 103–119. CrossRef
- Lilien, G.L., P. Kotler, and K.S. Moorthy. (1992). Marketing Models. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
- Mahajan, V. and E. Muller. (1986). “Advertising Pulsing Policies for Generating Awareness for New Products.” Marketing Science 5(2), 110–111.
- Maskin, E. and J. Tirole. (2001). “Markov Perfect Equilibrium.” Journal of Economic Theory 100(2), 191–219. CrossRef
- Montgomery, D.B., M.C. Moore, and J.E. Urbany. (2005). “Reasoning About Competitive Reactions.” Marketing Science 24(1), 138–149.Montgomery, D.B., M.C. Moore, and J.E. Urbany. (2005). “Reasoning About Competitive Reactions.” Marketing Science 24(1), 138–149. CrossRef
- Naik, P.A., M.K. Mantrala, and A.G. Sawyer. (1998). “Planning Media Schedules in the Presence of Dynamic Advertising Quality.” Marketing Science 17, 214–235.Montgomery, D.B., M.C. Moore, and J.E. Urbany. (2005). “Reasoning About Competitive Reactions.” Marketing Science 24(1), 138–149.
- Naples, M.J. (1979). Effective Frequency. New York: NY Association of National Advertisers.
- Nerlove, M. and K.J. Arrow. (1962). “Optimal Advertising Policy Under Dynamic Conditions.” Economica 29, 129–142.
- Nevo, A. (2001). “Measuring Market Power in the Ready-To-Eat Cereal Industry.” Econometrica 69(2), 307–342. CrossRef
- Pakes, A. and P. McGuire. (1994). “Computing Markov Perfect Nash Equilibrium: Numerical Implications of a Dynamic Differentiated Product Model.” Rand Journal of Economics 25(4), 555–589.
- Rao, A.G. and P.B. Miller. (1975). “Advertising/Sales Response Functions.” Journal of Advertising Research 15, 7–15.
- Rust, J. (1996). “Numerical Dynamic Programming in Economics.” In H.M. Amman, D.A. Kendrick, and J. Rust (eds.), Handbook of Computational Economics, Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 619–729.
- Samuelson, L. and M.J. Roberts. (1988). “An Empirical Analysis of Dynamic Non-Price Competition in an Oligopolistic Industry.” Rand Journal of Economics 19, 200–219.
- Sasiensi, M.W. (1971). “Optimal Advertising Expenditures.” Management Science 18(4), 64–72.Sasiensi, M.W. (1971). “Optimal Advertising Expenditures.” Management Science 18(4), 64–72.
- Shugan, S. and S. Radas. (2003). “Selective Marketing Strategies: Implications of Response Thresholds and Capacity Constraints.” Working Paper, University of Florida.
- Simon, J.L. (1969). “New Evidence for No Effect of Scale in Advertising.” Journal of Advertising Research 9, 38–41.
- Simon, H. (1982). “ADPULS: An Advertising Model with Wearout and Pulsation.” Journal of Marketing Research 19, 352–363.
- Slade, M.E. (1995). “Product Rivalry with Multiple Strategic Weapons: An Analysis of Price and Advertising Competition.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 4(3), 445–476. CrossRef
- Vakratsas, D., F.M. Feinberg, F.M. Bass, and G. Kalyanaram. (2004). “The Shape Of Advertising Response Functions Revisited: A Model of Dynamic Probabilistic Thresholds.” Marketing Science 23(1), 109–119. CrossRef
- Villas-Boas, M.J. (1993). “Predicting Advertising Pulsing Policies in an Oligopoly: A Model and Empirical Test.” Marketing Science 12, 88–102
- Villas-Boas, M. and R. Winer. (1999). “Endogeneity in Brand Choice Models.” Management Science 45(10), 1324–1338.
- White, H. (1982). “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models.” Econometrica 50(1), 1–25.
- Wittink, D.R. (1979). “Exploring Territorial Differences in the Relationship between Marketing Variables.” Journal of Marketing Research 15, 145–155.
- Wooldridge, J.M. (2001). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Boston: MIT Press.
- An Empirical Model of Advertising Dynamics
Quantitative Marketing and Economics
Volume 3, Issue 2 , pp 107-144
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- dynamic oligopoly
- Markov perfect equilibrium
- Industry Sectors