Aldrich, J. H. (1983). A Downsian spatial model with party activism. American Political Science Review
Alesina, A. (1988). Credibility and policy convergence in a two-party system with rational voters. The American Economic Review, 78(4), 796–805.
Barr, J. L., & Davis, O. A. (1966). An elementary political and economic theory of the expenditures of local governments. Southern Economic Journal
Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior
Black, D. (1958). The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Black, D., & Newing, R. A. (1951). Committee decisions with complementary valuation. London: William Hodge.
Bowen, H. R. (1943). The interpretation of voting in the allocation of economic resources. Quarterly Journal of Economics
Calvert, R. l. (1985). Robustness of the multidimensional voting model: candidate motivations, uncertainty, and convergence. American Journal of Political Science
Carmines, E. C., & Stimson, J. A. (1989). Issue evolution: race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cohen, M. E., & Axelrod, R. (1984). Coping with complexity: the adaptive value of changing utility. American Economic Review, 74(1), 30–42.
Cox, G. (1990). Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science
Cyert, R. M., & DeGroot, M. H. (1975). Adaptive utility. In R. H. Day & T. Groves (Eds.), Adaptive economic models. New York: Academic Press.
Cyert, R. M., & DeGroot, M. H. (1987). In Bayesian analysis and uncertainty in economic theory
. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (2004). Econometric theory and methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davis, O. A., & Hinich, M. J. (1966). A mathematical model of policy formation in a democratic society. In J. L. Bernd (Ed.), Mathematical applications in political science, II (pp. 175–208). Dallas: Arnold Foundation Monographs.
Davis, O. A., & Hinich, M. J. (1968). On the power and importance of the mean preference in a mathematical model of democratic choice. Public Choice
Davis, O. A., & Whinston, A. (1962). Externalities, welfare, and the theory of games. The Journal of Political Economy
Davis, O. A., Dempster, M. A. H., & Wildavsky, A. (1966). A theory of the budgetary process. American Political Science Review
Davis, O. A., Hinich, M. J., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1970). An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process. American Political Science Review
Davis, O. A., DeGroot, M. H., & Hinich, M. J. (1972). Social preference orderings and majority rule. Econometrica
Disch, L. (2011). Toward a mobilization conception of democratic representation. American Political Science Review
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
Enelow, J. M., & Hinich, M. J. (1983). On Plott’s pairwise symmetry condition for majority rule equilibrium. Public Choice
Erikson, R. S., & Romero, D. W. (1990). Candidate equilibrium and the behavioral model of the vote. American Political Science Review
Franklin, C. H., & Jackson, J. E. (1983). The dynamics of party identification. American Political Science Review
Gerber, E., & Jackson, J. E. (1993). Endogenous preferences and the study of institutions. American Political Science Review
Grzymała-Busse, A. M. (2002). Redeeming the communist past
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hinich, M. J., & Munger, M. C. (2008). The dynamics of issue introduction: a model based on the politics of ideology. Mathematical and Computer Modeling
Holcombe, R. G. (1980). An empirical test of the median voter model. Economic Inquiry
Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. Economic Journal
Inman, R. P. (1978). Testing political economy’s ‘as if’ proposition: is the median voter really decisive? Public Choice
Jackson, J. E. (1973). Intensities, preferences, and electoral politics. Social Science Research
Jackson, J. E. (1999). Electoral competition with endogenous voter preferences. In K. Kollman, J. Miller, & S. E. Page (Eds.), Computational models in political economy (pp. 109–142). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Jackson, J. E. (2013). The shrinking difference between spatial and valence issues. Discussion paper. Dept. of Political Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Jackson, J. E., & Kollman, K. (2010). A formulation of path dependence with an empirical example. Quarterly Journal of Political Science
Jackson, J. E., & Kollman, K. (2011). Connecting micro and macro partisanship. Political Analysis
Jackson, J. E., & Kollman, K. (2012). Modeling, measuring, and distinguishing path dependence, outcome dependence, and outcome independence. Political Analysis
Jackson, J. E., Klich, J., & Poznańska, K. (2005). The political economy of Poland’s transition: new firms and reform governments
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jackson, J. E., Mach, B. W., & Markowski, R. (2010). Party strategy and electoral competition in post-communist countries: evidence from Poland. Electoral Studies
Jessee, S. A. (2009). Spatial voting in the 2004 presidential election. American Political Science Review
Kessel, J. (1988). Presidential campaign politics. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.
Kinder, D. R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition (pp. 233–255). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., Abelson, R. P., & Fiske, S. T. (1980). Presidential prototypes. Political Behavior
Kollman, K., Miller, J. H., & Page, S. E. (1992). Adaptive parties in spatial elections. American Political Science Review
Lacy, D., & Paolino, P. (2010). Testing proximity versus directional voting using experiments. Electoral Studies
McCloskey, H., Hoffman, P. J., & O’Hara, R. (1960). Issue conflict and consensus among party leaders and followers. American Political Science Review
McKelvey, R. (1976). Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control. Journal of Economic Theory
McKelvey, R., & Schofield, N. (1986). Structural instability and the core. Journal of Mathematical Economics
Merrill, S. III, & Adams, J. (2002). Centrifugal incentives in multicandidate elections. Journal of Theoretical Politics
Miller, W. E., & Jennings, M. K. (1986). Parties in transition. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Peress, M. (2010). The spatial model with non-policy factors: a theory of policy motivated candidates. Social Choice & Welfare
Plott, C. R. (1967). A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. American Economic Review, 57(4), 787–806.
Romer, T., & Rosenthal, H. (1979). The elusive median voter. Journal of Public Economics
Sanders, D., Clarke, H. D., Stewart, M. C., & Whiteley, P. (2008). The endogeneity of preferences: evidence from the 2005 British Election Study. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties
Sanders, D., Clarke, H. D., Stewart, M. C., & Whiteley, P. (2011). Downs, stokes and the dynamics of electoral choice. British Journal of Political Science
Schofield, N., & Miller, G. (2003). Activists and partisan realignment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 245–260.
Schofield, N., & Miller, G. (2007). Elections and activist coalitions in the United States. American Journal of Political Science
Stokes, D. E. (1963). Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review
Tomz, M., & Van Houweling, R. P. (2008). Candidate positioning and voter choice. American Political Science Review, 102(3), 303–318.
Turnbull, G. K., & Djoundourian, S. S. (1994). The median voter hypothesis: evidence from general purpose local governments. Public Choice
Wittman, D. (1983). Candidate motivation: a synthesis of alternative theories. American Political Science Review