Abramowitz, A. I. (2008). Don’t blame primary voters for polarization. The Forum, 5(4).
Abramowitz, A., & Saunders, K. (2006). Is polarization a myth? Annual meeting of the southern political science association, Atlanta, GA.
Adams, J. (2001). Party competition and responsible party government: a theory of spatial competition based on insights from behavioral voting research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Adams, J. III, Merrill, S. (2003). Voter turnout and candidate strategies in American elections. Journal of Politics, 65(1), 161–189.
Aldrich, J. H. (1983). A Downsian spatial model with party activism. American Political Science Review
Aldrich, J. H. (1995). Why parties? The origins and transformation of political parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ansolabehere, S., Snyder, J. M. Jr., & Stewart, C. C. (2001). Candidate positioning in U.S. House elections. American Journal of Political Science
Bailey, M. (2004). The (sometimes surprising) consequences of societally unrepresentative contributions on legislative responsiveness. Business and Politics, 6(3).
Bailey, M., & Brady, D. (1998). Heterogeneity and representation: the Senate and free trade. American Journal of Political Science
Baron, D. P. (1994). Electoral competition with informed and uninformed voters. American Political Science Review
Basinger, S. J., & Ensley, M. J. (2007). Candidates, campaigns, or partisan conditions? reevaluating strategic politicians theory. Legislative Studies Quarterly
Berger, M. M., Munger, M. C., & Potthoff, R. (2000). With uncertainty, the Downsian model predicts convergence. Journal of Theoretical Politics
Bishin, B. G. (2000). Constituency influence in congress: does subconstituency matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly
Bishin, B. G., Dow, J. K., & Adams, J. (2006). Does democracy ‘suffer’ from diversity? issue representation and diversity in Senate elections. Public Choice
Boatwright, R. G. (2006). Expressive politics: issue strategies of congressional challengers. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Burden, B. C. (2004). Candidate positioning in U.S. congressional elections. British Journal of Political Science
Burden, B. C., Caldeira, G. A., & Groseclose, T. (2000). Measuring the ideologies of U.S. senators: the song remains the same. Legislative Studies Quarterly
Cameron, C. M., & Enelow, J. M. (1992). Asymmetric policy effects, campaign contributions, and the spatial theory of elections. Mathematical and Computer Modelling
Canon, D. T. (1993). Sacrificial lambs or strategic politicians? Political amateurism in U.S. House elections. American Journal of Political Science
Claassen, R. (2007). Ideology and evaluation in an experimental setting: comparing the proximity and the directional models. Political Research Quarterly
Clinton, J. D. (2006). Representation in Congress: constituents and roll calls in the 106th House. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 397–409.
Cox, G. W. (1990). Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science
Cox, G. W. (1999). Electoral rules and the calculus of mobilization. Legislative Studies Quarterly
Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (1993). Legislative leviathan: party government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Enelow, J., & Munger, M. C. (1993). The elements of candidate reputation: the effect of record and credibility on optimal spatial location. Public Choice
Ensley, M. J. (2009). Individual campaign contributions and candidate ideology. Public Choice
Erikson, R. S., & Wright, G. C. Jr. (2001). Voters, issues, and candidates in congressional elections. In L. C. Dodd et al. (Eds.), Congress reconsidered (7th ed.). Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Ezrow, L. (2006). The variance matters: how party systems represent the preferences of voters. Journal of Politics, 69(1), 182–192.
Fauxcheux, R. A. (2003). Writing your campaign plan. In R. A. Fauxcheux (Ed.), Winning elections: political campaign, management, strategy & tactics. New York: Evans & Company.
Feld, S. L., & Grofman, B. (1991). Incumbency advantage, voter loyalty, and the benefit of the doubt. Journal of Theoretical Politics
Fiorina, M. P. (1974). Representatives, roll calls, and constituencies. Lexington: Heath.
Fiorina, M. P. (1999). Whatever happened to the median voter? In MIT conference on parties and congress, Cambridge, MA.
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2005). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
Gerber, E. R., & Lewis, J. B. (2004). Beyond the median: voter preferences, district heterogeneity, and political representation. Journal of Political Economy
Gerber, E. R., & Morton, R. B. (1998). Primary election systems and representation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11(2), 302–304.
Goff, B. L., & Grier, K. B. (1993). On the (mis)measurement of legislator ideology and shirking. Public Choice
Griffin, J. D. (2006). Electoral competition and democratic responsiveness: a defense of the marginality hypothesis. Journal of Politics, 68(4), 909–919.
Grofman, B. (2004). Downs and two-party convergence. Annual Review of Political Science
Groseclose, T. (2001). A Model of candidate locations when one candidate has a valence advantage. American Journal of Political Science
Gulati, G. J. (2004). Revisiting the link between electoral competition and policy extremism in the U.S. Congress. American Politics Research
Halperin, M., & Harris, J. F. (2006). The way to win: taking the White House in 2008. New York: Random House.
Hinich, M. J., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1970). Plurality maximization versus vote maximization: a spatial analysis with variable participation. American Political Science Review
Hinich, M. J., Ledyard, J., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1972). Nonvoting and the existence of equilibrium under majority rule. Journal of Economic Theory
Holbrook, T. M., & McClurg, S. D. (2005). Presidential campaigns and the mobilization of core supporters. American Political Science Review
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1992). Political parties and electoral mobilization: political structure, social structure, and the party canvass. American Political Science Review
Jacobson, G. C. (2008). The politics of congressional elections (7th ed.). New York: Longman.
Jones, D. R. (2003). Position taking and position avoidance in the U.S. Senate. Journal of Politics, 65(3), 851–863.
Kanthak, K., & Morton, R. (2001). The effects of electoral rules on congressional primaries. In P.F. Galderisi et al. (Eds.), Congressional primaries and the politics of representation. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Horowitz, J. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science
McCarty, N., & Poole, K. (1998). An empirical spatial model of congressional campaigns. Political Analysis, 7, 1–30.
Miller, G., & Schofield, N. (2003). Activists and partisan realignment in the United States. American Political Science Review
Moon, W. (2004). Party activists, campaign resources and candidate position taking: theory, tests and applications. British Journal of Political Science
Morton, R., & Cameron, C. (1992). Elections and the theory of campaign contributions: a survey and critical analysis. Economics and Politics
Mueller, D. C., & Stratmann, T. (1994). Informative versus persuasive campaigning. Public Choice
Palfrey, T. R. (1984). Spatial equilibrium with entry. Review of Economic Studies
Poole, K. T., & Romer, T. (1985). Patterns of political action committees contributions to the 1980 campaigns for the United States House of Representatives. Public Choice
Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. L. (2007). Ideology and congress. Edison: Transaction.
Plane, D. L., & Gershtenson, J. (2004). Candidates’ ideological locations, abstention, and turnout in midterm U.S. Senate elections. Political Behavior
Ordeshook, P. C. (1969). Theory of the electoral process. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rochester.
Owen, G., & Grofman, B. (2006). Two-stage electoral competition in two-party contests: persistent divergence of party positions. Social Choice and Welfare
Rabinowitz, G., & MacDonald, S. E. (1989). A directional theory of issue voting. American
Political Science Review, 83, 93–121.
Rohrschneider, R. (2002). Mobilizing versus chasing: how do parties target voters in election campaigns? Electoral Studies
Sadiraj, V., Tuinstara, J., & van Winden, F. (2006). A computational electoral competition model with social clustering and endogenous interest groups as information brokers. Public Choice
Saunders, K. L., & Abramowitz, A. I. (2004). Ideological realignment and active partisans in the American electorate. American Politics Research
Slutsky, S. (1975). Abstentions and majority rule equilibrium. Journal of Economic Theory
Snyder, J. Jr. (1993). The market for campaign contributions: evidence for the U.S. Senate 1980–1986. Economics and Politics
Snyder, J. M. Jr., & Ting, M. M. (2002). An informational rationale for political parties. American Journal of Political Science
Stratmann, T. (2005). Some talk: money in politics. A (partial) review of the literature. Public Choice
Van Heerde, J., Johnson, W., & Bowler, S. (2006). Barriers to participation, voter sophistication and candidate spending choices in U.S. Senate elections. British Journal of Political Science
Wielhouwer, P. W. (2003). In search of Lincoln’s perfect list: targeting in grassroots campaigns. American Politics Research
Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zipp, J. (1985). Perceived representativeness and voting: an assessment of the impact of ‘choices’ vs. ‘echoes’. American Political Science Review