Skip to main content
Log in

Political parties and political shirking

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using ADA roll call voting scores for the 1947–2006 period, I find that senators shirk in their last term. The degree of shirking is limited by political parties, which constrain the politician in his last term, and varies by post-Senate career choices. The results highlight the importance of political parties in the repeated game that is electoral politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A. (1988a). Credibility and policy convergence in a two-party system with rational voters. The American Economic Review, 78(4), 796–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. (1988b). An overlapping generations model of electoral competition. Journal of Public Economics, 37, 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S., & Habel, P. (2008). Revisiting adjusted ADA scores for the u.s. congress, 1947–2007. Political Analysis, 17, 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansolabehere, S., & Snyder, J. M. (2004). Using term limits to estimate incumbency advantages when officeholders retire strategically. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 39(4), 487–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1973). The control of politicians: An economic model. Public Choice, 14, 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S., & Stigler, G. J. (1974). Law enforcement, malfeasance, and the compensation of enforcers. The Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, B., & Lott, J. R. (1996). Legislator voting and shirking: A critical review of the literature. Public Choice, 87, 67–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 769–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronars, S. G., & Lott, J. R. (1997). Do campaign donations alter how a politician votes? Or, do donors support candidates who value the same things that they do? Journal of Law and Economics, 40(2), 317–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J. (1994). Political shirking and the last term problem: Evidence for a party-administered pension system. Public Choice, 81, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougan, W. R., & Munger, M. C. (1989). The rationality of ideology. Journal of Law and Economics, 32(1), 119–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home style: house members in their districts. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, D. N. (1995). The effect of retirement on political shirking: Evidence from congressional voting. Public Finance Quarterly, 23, 226–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, D. N. (2000). Political shirking, opponent quality, and electoral support. Public Choice, 103, 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowrisankaran, G., Mitchell, M. F., & Moro, A. (2008). Electoral design and voter welfare from the us senate: Evidence from a dynamic selection model. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groseclose, T., Levitt, S. D., & Snyder, J. M. (1999). Comparing interest group scores across time and chambers: Adjusted ADA scores for the u s congress. American Political Science Review, 93(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50(3), 1029–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleibergen, F., & Paap, R. (2006). Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition. Journal of Econometrics, 133(1), 97–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. D. (1996). How do senators vote? disentangling the role of voter preferences, party affiliation, and senator ideology. American Economic Review, 86(3), 425–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, G. (2004). A model of political parties. Journal of Economic Theory, 115(2), 250–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J. R. (1987). Political cheating. Public Choice, 52, 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J. R. (1990). Attendance rates, political shirking, and the effect of post-elective office employment. Economic Inquiry, 28(1), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J. R., & Reed, W. R. (1989). Shirking and sorting in a political market with finite-lived politicians. Public Choice, 61(1), 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1984). Constituent interest and congressional voting. Journal of Law and Economics, 27(1), 181–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K., & Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: a political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C. I., & Woon, J. (2006). Congressional membership data, 80th to 109th congresses, 1947–2006: Senate.

  • VanBeek, J. R. (1991). Does the decision to retire increase the amount of political shirking? Public Finance Review, 19(4), 444–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zupan, M. A. (1990). The last period problem in politics: Do congressional representatives not subject to a reelection constraint alter their voting behavior? Public Choice, 65, 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason DeBacker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeBacker, J. Political parties and political shirking. Public Choice 150, 651–670 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9722-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9722-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation