X-ray absorption spectroscopy
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Yano, J. & Yachandra, V.K. Photosynth Res (2009) 102: 241. doi:10.1007/s11120-009-9473-8
- 2.8k Views
This review gives a brief description of the theory and application of X-ray absorption spectroscopy, both X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS), especially, pertaining to photosynthesis. The advantages and limitations of the methods are discussed. Recent advances in extended EXAFS and polarized EXAFS using oriented membranes and single crystals are explained. Developments in theory in understanding the XANES spectra are described. The application of X-ray absorption spectroscopy to the study of the Mn4Ca cluster in Photosystem II is presented.
KeywordsPhotosystem IIWater oxidationOxygen evolutionManganese clusterX-ray spectroscopyEXAFSXANESX-ray dichroism
- PS II
X-ray absorption spectroscopy
X-ray absorption fine structure
Electron paramagnetic resonance
X-ray absorption near-edge structure
During the past 30 years, X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) has made major contributions to a wide variety of biochemical research topics. It has been raising important questions of correlation between structure and function of the metal sites in metallo-proteins, including the photosynthetic oxygen-evolving complex (OEC; Yano and Yachandra 2008). The history of the development of the experimental method of XAS (Sayers et al. 1971; Eisenberger and Kincaid 1978) overlaps the history of the structural research on the OEC in photosystem II (PS II). The historical background of the XAS study on PS II, especially the early work, has been reviewed in some detail (Yachandra et al. 1996; Penner-Hahn 1998; Yachandra 2005; Yano and Yachandra 2007; Sauer et al. 2008).
In X-ray spectroscopy, transitions are involved in absorption (XAS, X-ray absorption spectroscopy) or emission (XES, X-ray emission spectroscopy) of X-rays, where the former probes the ground state to the excited state transitions, while the latter probes the decay process from the excited state. Both methods characterize the chemical nature and environment of atoms in molecules, and synchrotron sources provide a range of X-ray energies that are applicable to most elements in the periodic table, in particular, those present in redox-active metallo-enzymes. The choice of the energy of the X-rays used, in most cases, determines the specific element being probed. This is quite a contrast with other methods, such as optical or UV absorption, fluorescence, magnetic susceptibility, electrochemistry etc., which have been applied to study biological redox systems. The results from infrared and Raman spectroscopy can be related to specific elements through isotopic substitution, but the analysis of such spectra for metal clusters is complicated when the structure is not known. In this article, we focus on XAS methods which have been used in the field of photosynthesis. The XES methods are discussed in the paper by Bergmann and Glatzel (this issue).
X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) is the measurement of transitions from core electronic states of the metal to the excited electronic states (LUMO) and the continuum; the former is known as X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES), and the latter as extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) which studies the fine structure in the absorption at energies greater than the threshold for electron release. These two methods give complementary structural information, the XANES spectra reporting electronic structure and symmetry of the metal site, and the EXAFS reporting numbers, types, and distances to ligands and neighboring atoms from the absorbing element (Koningsberger and Prins 1988).
X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) allows us to study the local structure of the element of interest without interference from absorption by the protein matrix, water or air. Yet, X-ray spectroscopy of metallo-enzymes has been a challenge due to the small relative concentration of the element of interest in the sample. In the PS II, for example, Mn may be at the level of 10 parts per million or less. In such a case, the use of X-ray fluorescence for the detection of the absorption spectra, instead of using the transmission detection mode, has been the standard approach. The development of intense third generation synchrotron radiation X-ray sources has also permitted the study of dilute samples.
Metal complexes, as models with known structures, have been essential in order to understand the XAS of metallo-proteins. These complexes provide a basis for evaluating the influence of the coordination environment (coordination charge) on the absorption edge energy (Cinco et al. 1999; Pizarro et al. 2004). Study of structurally well-characterized model complexes also provides a benchmark for understanding the EXAFS from metal systems of unknown structure.
The significant advantage of XAS over the X-ray crystallography is that the local structural information around the element of interest can be obtained even from disordered samples, such as powders and solution. However, ordered samples, such as membranes and single crystals, often increases the information obtained from XAS. For oriented single crystals or ordered membranes, the interatomic vector orientations can be deduced from dichroism measurements. These techniques are especially useful for determining the structures of multi-nuclear metal clusters, such as the Mn4Ca cluster associated with water oxidation in the photosynthetic oxygen-evolving complex (OEC). Moreover, quite small changes in geometry/structure associated with transitions between the intermediate states, known as the S-states, in the cycle of the water-oxidation reaction can be readily detected using XAS. Another useful approach has been to collect complementary EXAFS measurements, for example, at both the Mn and Ca K-edges for the OEC cluster (Cinco et al. 2002), or following a Sr → Ca replacement measuring data at the Mn and Sr K-edges (Latimer et al. 1995; Cinco et al. 1998; Pushkar et al. 2008). Such measurements greatly improve the information that can be obtained for multi-nuclear metal clusters, such as the Mn4Ca cluster in PS II, as the precision of the fits can be improved by such complementary data.
X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) theory has been developed to an extent that it can be applied to complicated molecules of known structure (Teo 1986; Rehr and Albers 2000). Although it is less straightforward to apply it to the OEC, where its molecular environment is not yet precisely defined, the basic XAS equation allows us to interpret EXAFS spectra to considerable advantage. X-ray spectral properties to be expected from specified cluster geometries can be calculated and compared with experimental measurements. Density-functional theory (DFT) can be applied to issues like the stability of a proposed cluster arrangement or the likelihood of postulated reaction paths. Moreover, the time-dependent DFT calculations provide an important insight into the electronic structure of the metal site combined with the analysis of the XANES pre-edge region.
In the current review, we summarize the basics of XAS, and also discuss some techniques which have been applied to study the OEC of PS II.
Theory of XAS
The dominant contribution to the K-edge spectrum comes from 1s → np transitions, where np represents the lowest unoccupied p orbital of the absorbing atom. This transition, with ∆l = 1 (l is the orbital momentum quantum number), is quantum mechanically allowed and is typically intense. For transition metals with partially occupied d orbitals, additional insights can be gained by examination of pre-edge features that result from 1s to (n − 1)d transitions. These are relatively weak in intensity (∆l = 2; hence, formally forbidden or dipole-forbidden), but they can be detected as they occur at energies slightly less than that of the main absorption edge. The pre-edge peak intensity increases when the ligand environment is perturbed from octahedral symmetry (see “Mn K-edge pre-edge spectra and DFT calculations”).
The amplitude function contains the Debye–Waller factor and Nj, the number of backscatterers at Raj. These two parameters are highly correlated, which makes the determination of Nj difficult. The backscattering amplitude function fj(π, k) depends on the atomic number of the scattering atom, and scattering intensity increases with the electron density (i.e., atomic number) of the scattering atom. In principle, this can be used to identify the scattering atoms. In practice, however, the phase shift and backscattering amplitude function, both of which are dependent on the identity of the backscattering atom, can be used only to identify scattering atoms that are well separated by atomic number (Rehr and Albers 2000).
The importance of the EXAFS technique to the biochemist or structural biologist depends directly on the fact that the EXAFS modulations contain information about the distance between the absorbing and backscattering atoms within a distance of about 5 Å, as well as the identity and number of the backscattering atoms. Essentially, EXAFS analysis is used to determine the radial distribution of atoms around a particular absorbing atom, thus providing a probe for the local structure in the vicinity of the absorbing atom; for example, the metal in the active site of an enzyme. These vector lengths (distances) can be determined to a precision of 0.02 Å and much more precisely than by conventional X-ray crystallography.
Advantages and limitations of XAS
We summarized the advantages and the limitations (Eisenberger and Brown 1979) of the XAS method as follows.
X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) is element specific, so one can focus on one element without interference from other elements present in the sample. In a protein, which has more than one metal like cytochrome oxidase (Cu and Fe), or nitrogenase (Fe and Mo), it is possible to study the structural environment of each metal atom selectively. The element specificity and the fact that it is always possible to obtain an X-ray spectrum of an element also means that one ‘sees’ all of the metal of interest, which is present in the sample. This makes it imperative that one is sure of the biochemical homogeneity of the sample and, if there is more than one site for the same metal, to resolve the structural parameters of the different sites.
Another important advantage of XAS is that the metal of interest is never ‘silent’ with respect to X-ray absorption spectra. The system could be ‘silent’ with respect to EPR, optical, or other spectroscopic methods, but one can always probe the metal site structure by XAS.
X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) is not limited by the state of the sample, because it is sensitive only to the local metal site structure. The sample can be prepared as a powder, a solution or, as is done most often, as a frozen solution for biological samples. It is not necessary to obtain single crystals of the material to examine the local structure of the metal. However, having oriented crystals such as membranes and single crystals significantly increases the structural information obtained from the XAS method. This will be discussed in a latter section.
The more important aspect is that one can either trap intermediates in the enzymatic cycle or modify the site by the addition of inhibitors or substrate or generate other chemical modifications. Such samples can be made as frozen solutions, avoiding the problems of trying to obtain single crystals. The study by this technique of trapped intermediates and treated samples has yielded insights into the mechanism of the reaction involved, in several biological systems.
Damage to biological samples by X-rays is cause for serious concern for X-ray crystallography and XAS experiments. However, with the right precautions one can successfully perform these experiments leaving the materials largely intact. The most serious damage is produced by the reaction with free radicals and hydrated electrons that are produced in biological samples by X-rays. The diffusion of the free radicals and hydrated electrons can be minimized by the use of low temperatures. The use of a liquid He flow cryostat or liquid He cryostream, where the samples are at atmospheric pressure in a He gas atmosphere, has greatly reduced the risk of sample damage by X-rays. XAS experiments require a lower X-ray dose than X-ray crystallography, and radiation damage can be precisely monitored and controlled, thus allowing for data collection from an intact metal cluster (Yano et al. 2005b; Corbett et al. 2007).
It is also important to realize the intrinsic limitations of EXAFS, beyond those of a purely experimental nature. A frequent problem is the inability to distinguish between scattering atoms with little difference in atomic number (C, N, O or S, Cl, or Mn, Fe). Care must also be exercised when deciding between atoms that are apart in Z, as frequently, it is possible to obtain equally good fits using backscattering atoms which are very different in Z (e.g., Mn or Cl), but which are at different distances from the absorbing atom. This is more acute when dealing with Fourier peaks at greater distances. In bridged multinuclear centers, it is not always possible to unequivocally assign the Fourier peaks at >3 Å (Scott and Eidsness 1988).
Distances are usually the most reliably determined structural parameters from EXAFS. But the range of data that can be collected, often-times due to practical reasons like the presence of the K-edge of another metal, limits the resolution of distance determinations to between 0.1 and 0.2 Å. Also it is difficult to determine whether a Fourier peak should be fit to one distance with a relatively large disorder parameter or to two distances, each having a small disorder parameter. Careful statistical analysis, taking into consideration the degrees of freedom in the fits, should precede any such analysis. The resolution in the distance Δr can be estimated from the relation that ΔrΔk ~ 1 (see “Range-extended XAS”).
Determination of coordination numbers or number of backscatterers is fraught with difficulties. The Debye–Waller factor is strongly correlated with the coordination number and one must have recourse to other information to narrow the range that is possible from curve-fitting analysis alone. It is useful to compare the spectra from the unknown complex to some known model complexes (assuming that there is evidence that the structure resembles that of the model complex) and then use Debye–Waller parameters obtained from the model complexes in the fits. This method works reasonably well, when the structure of the system being studied is well-modeled by inorganic complexes.
X-ray absorption spectroscopy studies of photosystem II
One of the advantages of XAS is that one can potentially study the chemical events from each element which is involved in the reaction. In the OEC, Mn, Ca, and possibly Cl are the key elements we can focus on, in order to obtain the mechanistic information during the catalytic cycle. The XAS results, with emphasis on results from our laboratory, will be used to highlight the utility of the technique for the study of the Mn4Ca cluster in PS II.
The EXAFS is interpretable as shells at 1.8 and 2.0 Å (Peak I) attributable to N or O atoms and a shell at ~2.7–2.8 Å (Peak II) from Mn to Mn interactions. An additional shell from Mn was seen at 3.3 Å (Peak III; Fig. 3). The Mn EXAFS spectra changes upon the S-state transitions, particularly from the S2 to S3 state transition, suggesting that the OEC goes through structural changes triggered by the oxidation state changes and protonation/deprotonation events.
The S-state catalytic cycle can be studied also by co-factor XAS studies (Cinco et al. 2002). One Ca is known to be a part of the OEC, and this has been proven by Ca XAS studies and from X-ray crystallography using the anomalous diffraction technique. Regarding Cl, there is no spectroscopic evidence at least in the S1 state that the Cl is a direct ligand to the OEC, although several biochemical studies suggest a critical role for one tightly bound Cl in maintaining oxygen-evolving activity.
In general, the requirements of X-ray spectroscopy place some restrictions with respect to sample preparation and experimental conditions. Ca and Cl in some sense fall into this category. The investigation of light elements can present difficulties due to the presence of an aqueous medium and the pervasive occurrence of C, N, and O in biological materials. In X-ray energy regions, where atmospheric gases absorb, samples must be placed in an atmosphere of helium or in vacuum. For elements like Ca and Cl, which can occur in a wide variety of environments in biological materials, it is particularly challenging to remove sources of background signals that greatly complicate interpreting the results.
Another strategy to study the role of such light element co-factor(s) is to replace it with heavier element(s). Ca can be replaced chemically or biosynthetically with Sr without losing its enzymatic activity. Similarly, Cl can be substituted with Br. XAS measurements at the Sr K-edge (16,200 eV; Cinco et al. 1998; Pushkar et al. 2008) or Br K-edge (13,600 eV; Haumann et al. 2006) compared to those at lower-energy Ca K-edge (~4,050 eV) or Cl K-edge (~2,850 eV) are less prone to X-ray damage, if we compare the X-ray damage by the total number of X-ray photons per area at each energy. It is also preferred for experimental reasons as X-rays at higher energies are attenuated less by the air path, the buffer solution in which the sample is made, and the cryostat windows.
The use of a high-resolution crystal monochromator (see the article by Bergmann and Glatzel, this issue) allows us to selectively separate the Mn K fluorescence from that of Fe (Fig. 4), resulting in the collection of data to higher photoelectron energies and leading to increased distance resolution of 0.1 Å. The new detection scheme produces distinct advantages: (1) improvement in the distance resolution, and (2) more precise determination in the numbers of metal–metal vectors.
These data resolve a distance heterogeneity in the short Mn–Mn distances of the S1 and S2 state and thereby provide firm evidence for three Mn–Mn distances between ~2.7 and ~2.8 Å (Yano et al. 2005a; Pushkar et al. 2007). This result gives clear criteria for selecting and refining possible structures from the repertoire of proposed models based on spectroscopic and diffraction data.
Polarized XAS studies on oriented membranes
Membrane proteins like PS II can be oriented on a substrate such that the lipid membrane planes are roughly parallel to the substrate surface. This imparts a one-dimensional order to these samples, while the z-axis for each membrane (collinear with the membrane normal) is roughly parallel to the substrate normal, the x and y axes remain disordered. Exploiting the plane-polarized nature of synchrotron radiation, spectra can be collected at different angles between the substrate normal and the X-ray E vector. The dichroism, which is the dependence of the intensity of the absorber–backscatterer pairs present in the oriented samples as a function of the polarization of the X-rays, is reflected in, and can be extracted from, the resulting X-ray absorption spectra (George et al. 1989, 1993). The EXAFS of the oriented PS II samples exhibits distinct dichroism, from which we have deduced the relative orientations of several interatomic vector directions relative to the membrane normal and derived a topological representation of the metal sites in the OEC (Mukerji et al. 1994; Dau et al. 1995; Cinco et al. 2004; Pushkar et al. 2007).
By fitting the θ-dependence of Napp by nonlinear regression analysis, the average relative orientation ϕ and Napp can be obtained.
Figure 5b shows the orientation of the membranes with respect to the X-ray E-vector and an example of the polarized spectrum from PS II.
However, as the samples are ordered in only one dimension, the dichroism information is available only in the form of an angle with respect to the membrane normal. For EXAFS measurements, this means that the absorber–backscatterer vectors can lie anywhere on a cone defined by the angle the vector forms with the membrane normal as shown in Fig. 5c.
Polarized XAS studies using single crystals of PS II
This type of analysis can also be useful for systems, where a high-resolution X-ray crystal structure is not available, such as PS II. Examination of the orientation dependence of the EXAFS of single crystals will provide structural information about the Mn sites at resolution higher than will be practically obtainable from single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Performing single-crystal EXAFS experiments can help to refine the low-resolution structure of the OEC by revealing information such as the angle(s) between the di-μ-oxo-bridged Mn–Mn vectors (~2.7 Å), as well as the relative orientation between the mono-μ-oxo Mn–Mn vector (~3.3 Å) and the di-μ-oxo-bridged Mn–Mn vectors. The directions of the Mn–Mn vectors in conjunction with the electron density derived from X-ray crystallography promises to refine the structure of the Mn complex to a resolution that neither method has presently achieved.
We have shown that the polarized EXAFS data from the single crystals of PS II improve the resolution of the distances and the determination of the directions of the vectors of the Mn complex, thus leading to a more refined structure of the Mn cluster (Yano et al. 2006).
Mn K-edge pre-edge spectra and DFT calculations
In “X-ray absorption spectroscopy studies of photosystem II”, we discussed the oxidation states of the OEC obtained from Mn XANES. In order to obtain a more detailed view of the electronic structure at the metal site, it is preferable to probe the lowest unoccupied metal 3d orbitals. The pre-edge spectra arise from excitations of 1s electron into 3d orbitals that are mainly localized around the metal ion. It shows the immediate surrounding of the excited ion through the Coulomb interaction between the core hole and the valence electrons within a short range. This pre-edge feature is a quadrupole-allowed transition; it occurs at a lower energy than the main edge transitions with approximately 1% of the intensity of the dipole-allowed main-edge transition. The transition can gain intensity by the metal 4p mixing, when the metal–ligand environment is distorted from a centro-symmetric to a non-centro-symmetric coordination. The spectra reflect coordination number, ligand environment, and oxidation state of metals. In fact, the pre-edge spectra of PS II noticeably change during the S-state transitions (Messinger et al. 2001). In the single-crystal XANES of PS II S1 state, the pre-edge spectra show a characteristic dichroism (Yano et al. 2006). Additionally, the nature of the S4 state can be studied by the pre-edge feature if a high-valent Mn, such as Mn(V), is involved in the transition. In order to understand the pre-edge feature and obtain the electronic configuration, however, one needs to investigate various model compounds and combine experimental data with theoretical calculations based on the ligand field and/or Density-functional theories.
Several unresolved problems are being addressed through new directions in XAS that are being pursued in different laboratories.
Time-dependent XAS with sub-μs time resolution opens the possibility of identifying and characterizing intermediates in the individual S-state transitions that have not yet been documented (Haumann et al. 2005). Of particular interest is the series of events on the ms time scale that accompany the formation of dioxygen during the S4 to S0 transition.
The combination of XAS with X-ray microscopy has shown great promise in studying very small localized domains of larger biological systems, and the possibility for combining imaging with spectroscopy. Another powerful approach has been the combined in situ use of XAS along with other methods, such as X-ray diffraction, electrochemistry, UV/Vis or FTIR/Raman spectroscopy. This methodology has allowed for monitoring of changes in the system and also the integrity of the sample. These methodologies are being applied to substrate binding studies and for following the course of catalytic reactions.
The research presented here was supported by the NIH Grant GM 55302, and by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (OBES), Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences of the Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231. Synchrotron facilities were provided by the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (SSRL), the Advanced Light Source (ALS), and the Advanced Photon Source (APS) operated by DOE OBES. The SSRL Biomedical Technology program is supported by NIH, the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), and the DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.