Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analyzing commuter train user behavior: a decision framework for access mode and station choice

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the current research effort is to develop a framework for a better understanding of commuter train users’ access mode and station choice behavior. Typically, access mode and station choice for commuter train users is modeled as a hierarchical choice with access mode being considered as the first choice in the sequence. The current study proposes a latent segmentation based approach to relax the hierarchy. In particular, this innovative approach simultaneously considers two segments of station and access mode choice behavior: Segment 1—station first and access mode second and Segment 2—access mode first and station second. The allocation to the two segments is achieved through a latent segmentation approach that determines the probability of assigning the individual to either of these segments as a function of socio-demographic variables, level of service (LOS) parameters, trip characteristics, land-use and built environment factors, and station characteristics. The proposed latent segment model is estimated using data from an on-board survey conducted by the Agence Métropolitaine de Transport for commuter train users in Montreal region. The model is employed to investigate the role of socio-demographic variables, LOS parameters, trip characteristics, land-use and built environment factors, and station characteristics on commuter train user behavior. The results indicate that as the distance from the station by active forms of transportation increases, individuals are more likely to select a station first. Young persons, females, car owners, and individuals leaving before 7:30 a.m. have an increased propensity to drive to the commuter train station. The station model indicates that travel time has a significant negative impact on station choice, whereas, presence of parking and increased train frequency encourages use of the stations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appleyard, B.: Sustainable and healthy travel choices and the built environment. Transp. Res. Rec. 2303(1), 38–45 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, A., Gliebe, J., Strathman, J.: Modeling access mode choice for inter-suburban commuter rail. J. Public Transp. 14(4), 23–42 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.: Work travel mode choice and number of non-work commute stops. Transp. Res. Part B 31(1), 41–54 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R., Gorham, R.: Commuting in transit versus automobile neighborhoods. J. American Plan. Assoc. 61(2), 210–225 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debrezion, G., Pels, E., Rietveld, P.: Choice of departure station by railway users. Eur. Transp. XIII(37), 78–92 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Debrezion, G., Pels, E., Rietveld, P.: Modelling the joint access mode and railway station choice. Transp. Res. Part E 45(1), 270–283 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eluru, N., Bhat, C.R.: A joint econometric analysis of seat belt use and crash-related injury severity. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39(5), 1037–1049 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eluru, N., Sener, I.N., Bhat, C.R., Pendyala, R.M., Axhausen, K.W.: Understanding residential mobility: a joint model of the reason for residential relocation and stay duration. Transp. Res. Rec. 2133, 64–74 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eluru, N., Chakour, V., El-Geneidy, A.: Travel mode choice and transit route choice behavior in Montreal: insights from mcgill university members commute patterns. Public Transp. 4(2), 129–149 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, K., Miller, E., Badoe, D.: Modeling rail access mode and station choice. Transp. Res. Rec. 1413, 49–59 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • FHWA: Status of the Nation’s Highways, Bridges, and Transit. FHWA, Washington, DC (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Givoni, M., Rietveld, P.: The access journey to the railway station and its role in passengers’ satisfaction with rail travel. Transp. Policy 14(5), 357–365 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, T.: Public Transportation’s Role in Responding to Climate Change (2009)

  • Keijer, M.J.N., Rietveld, P.: How do people get to the railway station? The Dutch experience. Transp. Plan. Technol. 23(3), 215–235 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krygsman, S., Dijst, M., Arentze, T.: Multimodal public transport: an analysis of travel time elements and the interconnectivity ratio. Transp. Policy 11(3), 265–275 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou, P.S., Talvitie, A.P.: Disaggregate access mode and station choice models for rail trips. Transp. Res. Rec. 526, 42–65 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., Kang, J.: Factors that influence walking and biking to the station: modeling commuter rail user’s access mode choice. In: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, 2008

  • Pinjari, A., Eluru, N., Bhat, C., Pendyala, R., Spissu, E.: Joint model of choice of residential neighborhood and bicycle ownership: accounting for self-selection and unobserved heterogeneity. Transp. Res. Rec. 2082(-1), 17–26 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinjari, A., Pendyala, R., Bhat, C., Waddell, P.: Modeling residential sorting effects to understand the impact of the built environment on commute mode choice. Transportation 34(5), 557–573 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinjari, A., Pendyala, R., Bhat, C., Waddell, P.: Modeling the choice continuum: an integrated model of residential location, auto ownership, bicycle ownership, and commute tour mode choice decisions. Transportation 38(6), 933–958 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajamani, J., Bhat, C., Handy, S., Knaap, G., Song, Y.: Assessing impact of urban form measures on nonwork trip mode choice after controlling for demographic and level-of-service effects. Transp. Res. Rec. 1831(-1), 158–165 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sider T., Alam, A., Zukari, M., Dugum, H., Goldstein, N., Eluru, N., Hatzopoulou, M.: Land-use and socio-economics as determinants of traffic emissions and individual exposure to air pollution. J. Transp. Geogr. (2013). doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.006

  • van Wee, B., van Baren, R.: Preferences for modes, residential location and travel behaviour: the relevance of land-use impacts on mobility. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastructure Res. 2(2), 305–315 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, P., Bhat, C., Eluru, N., Wang, L., Pendyala, R.: Modeling interdependence in household residence and workplace choices. Transp. Res. Rec. 2003, 84–92 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardman, M., Whelan, G. A.: Using Geographical Information Systems to Improve Rail Demand Models (1999)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The corresponding author would like to acknowledge financial support from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada under the Discovery Grants program for undertaking the research. The authors would like to extend their appreciation to Daniel Bergeron from Agence Métropolitaine de Transport (AMT) and Prof. Ahmed El-Geneidy from McGill University for sharing the data used in our study. The authors would also like to acknowledge useful feedback from three anonymous reviewers and the editor Prof. David Hartgen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naveen Eluru.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chakour, V., Eluru, N. Analyzing commuter train user behavior: a decision framework for access mode and station choice. Transportation 41, 211–228 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9509-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9509-y

Keywords

Navigation