Abstract
This article explores the relationship between social enterprise and a much-longer known set of arrangements generally comprehended as “public enterprise” (or “state-owned enterprise”). It considers the decline in some contexts in the use of, and interest in, public enterprise that reflects the impact of the privatization movement, and the rise of social enterprise as an alternative form—with speculation about cause-and-effect connections between these movements. An exploration of this sort may contribute in the longer term to a better understanding of the place of “public”, “social” and “community” values and structures within the general framework of governance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a recent discussion of the nature of “publicness”, see Aulich 2011.
For a more extensive list of references, see Hayllar and Wettenhall 2011. We are grateful to the City University of Hong Kong for a Strategic Grant (Project number 7002538) which has facilitated the basic research on social enterprise.
Needless to say, public enterprise of this sort is especially prevalent in the centrally planned economies.
Of course, they did not always attain these ideals. But they did it far more often than the privatizers, with their vested interest in denigrating them, would allow.
For selected articles, see Wettenhall and Thynne 2005b.
The cooperative movement has its own dedicated intellectual and practitioner following, to be seen, e.g., in the journal Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. The year 2012 was declared to be the International Year of Co-operatives by the United Nations.
See Hayllar and Wettenhall 2011: 21–23 for some indications of this “explosive growth”. To cite the UK case alone: some 55,000 SEs were identified in 2006, employing over 3.3 % of the working age population. Over 62,000 were identified in 2007, and recent estimates suggest that by 2010 they were contributing £24 billion to the economy in terms of Gross Value Added (from Social Enterprise UK 2011).
The Grameen Bank is generally considered to be one of the largest. It won its Bangladeshi founder Muhammad Younis a Nobel Peace Prize in 2006 and has grown into the “Grameen Family” of over two dozen enterprises today: Grameen Bank 2013.
Complemented by a Right to Run initiative giving frontline staff a right to run services, on which see Hampson 2010.
References
Aulich, C. (2011). It’s not ownership that matters: it’s publicness. Policy Studies, 32(3), 199–213.
Barrakeet, J., & Archer, V. (2010). Social inclusion through community enterprise? Examining the available evidence. Third Sector Review, 16(1), 13–28.
Coombs, D. (1971). State enterprise: Business or politics? London: Allen & Unwin.
Erman, A. (1969). Life in Ancient Egypt (translated by H.M. Tirad). New York: Benjamin Blom (first published 1894).
Farazmand, A. (2001). Privatization and public enterprise reform in Post-Revolutionary Iran. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Privatization or public enterprise reform? (pp. 175–200). Westport: Greenwood Press.
Florio, M., & Fecher, F. (2011). The future of public enterprises: contributions to a new discourse. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 82(4), 361–373.
Gernet, J. (1982). A history of Chinese civilization (translated by J. R. Foster). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (first published 1972).
Grameen Bank. (2013). http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki.Grameen_Bank. [accessed 5.2.2013].
Hampson, G. (2010). Social enterprise: All frontline staff given right to run services http://socialenterpriselive.com/section/news/public-services/20101117/all-frontli… [accessed 5.12.2012].
Hayllar, M. R., & Wettenhall, R. (2011). Social enterprise: what is it, and how can it be strengthened? The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 33(1), 17–36.
Hertz, N. (2011). Co-op capitalism: A new economic model from the carnage of the old.Manchester: Think-piece 6, Cooperatives UK.
HKHAB (Hong Kong Home Affairs Bureau) (2008). Promoting the further development of social enterprise (Report of Subcommittee to Study the Subject of Combating Poverty), LC Paper No. CB(2) 2491/07-08(01).
Kitiwaki, Y. (2011). ‘New Public Commons’: a financial retrenchment method for Japan. Asian Review of Public Administration, 22(2), 34–46.
Letwin, O. (Minister for Government Policy) & Alexander, D. (Chief Secretary to Treasury). (2012). Open public services 2012. London: Cabinet Office.
McKinlay, P. (1999). Public ownership and the community. Wellington: Institute for Policy Studies, Victoria University of Wellington.
Mintzberg, H. (2012). Remarks in launching his Rebalancing society: Radical renewal beyond Adam Smith and Marx at the Bertha Centre for Social Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the University of Capetown’s Graduate School of Business.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E., et al. (Eds.). (2002). The drama of the commons. Washington: National Academy Press.
Ramanadham, V. V. (1984). The nature of public enterprise. London: Croom Helm.
Social Enterprise UK (2011). Fightback Britain, available at http://www.socialenterprise.org.uk/data/files/publications/Fightback_Britain.pdf .
Verney, D. V. (1959). Public enterprise in Sweden. Liverpool: University of Liverpool Press.
Wettenhall, R. (2007). ActewAGL: A genuine public-private partnership. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(5), 392–414.
Wettenhall, R. (2009). Mixed enterprise and the Global Financial Crisis: relevance for the 21st century of a 20th century institution. Asian Review of Public Administration, 21(1/2), 47–70.
Wettenhall, R., & Thynne, I. (2005a). Ownership and management in the public sphere: governance issues and concerns. The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 27(2), 263–290.
Wettenhall, R. & Thynne, I. (Eds). (2005b). Symposium on public ownership and enterprise management, The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration. 27(2).
World Bank. (1995). Bureaucrats in business: The economics and politics of government ownership. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hayllar, M.R., Wettenhall, R. As Public Goes Private, Social Emerges: The Rise of Social Enterprise. Public Organiz Rev 13, 207–217 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0234-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0234-y