On the ‘Urbanness’ of Metropolitan Areas: Testing the Homogeneity Assumption, 1970–2000
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
In recent decades, population dynamics, have made definitions of what localities are rural or urban somewhat unclear. The vast majority of demographic work has simply used metropolitan classifications with various forms of a non-metropolitan residual (e.g., adjacent to metro versus non-adjacent). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) periodically redefines metropolitan areas, which makes temporal comparisons difficult. In fact, some demographers have offered the idea that, due to these shifting reclassifications, the so-called “rural rebound” is a misnomer, in that non-metropolitan counties that transitioned to metropolitan status were, in fact, already more ‘urban’ than those that did not become reclassified as metropolitan (Johnson et al 2005). This argument depends largely on the assumption of homogeneity in rural or urban ‘character’ in those counties. Following arguments by others (Wilkinson 1991; Isserman 2001; Bogue 1950), we take population and land use into account to examine whether these transitional counties were more or less urban than comparable others, all at the county level for the contiguous 48 states for 1970–2000. Our results show that adjacent non-metropolitan counties that were later reclassified as metropolitan were indeed characterized by a larger population and heavier urban land cover than those not making this transition. However, the results also show that metropolitan areas were also quite heterogeneous in terms of traditionally rural activities. A discussion of the homogeneity assumption in demographers’ conceptualization of metropolitan areas is included.
- Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27, 93–115.
- Bailey, K. (1994). “Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques”. #102: Quantitative applications in the social sciences series. London: Sage.
- Bogue, D. J. (1950). Changes in population distribution since 1940. American Journal of Sociology, 56(1), 43–57. doi:10.1086/220642. CrossRef
- Brown, D. L., & Zuiches, J. J. (1993). Rural-urban population redistribution in the united states at the end of the twentieth century. In D. L. Brown, D. Field, & J. J. Zuiches (Eds.), The demography of rural life (pp. 1–18). University Park, PA: Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development.
- Frey, W. H. (1987). Migration and depopulation of the metropolis: Regional restructuring or rural renaissance? American Sociological Review, 52(2), 240–257. doi:10.2307/2095452. CrossRef
- Frey, W. H., & Spear, A., Jr. (1992). The revival of the metropolitan population growth in the United States: An assessment of findings from the 1990 census. Population and Development Review, 18(1), 129–146. doi:10.2307/1971864. CrossRef
- Fuguitt, G. V., Heaton, T. B., & Lichter, D. T. (1988). Monitoring the metropolitanization process. Demography, 25(1), 115–128. doi:10.2307/2061481. CrossRef
- GARM. (1994). “Geographical Areas Reference Manual”. U.S. Department of Commerce: Bureau of the Census. Issued November 1994.
- Gaspar, J., & Glaeser, E. (1997). Information technology and the future of cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 43, 136–156. doi:10.1006/juec.1996.2031. CrossRef
- Glaeser, E., & Kahn, M. (2004). Sprawl and urban growth. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 4, Chapter 56, pp. 2482–2525). NY, USA: North Holland Press.
- Glaeser, E., Scheinkman, J., & Shleifer, A. (1995). Economic growth in a cross-section of cities. Journal of Monetary Economics, 36, 117–143. doi:10.1016/0304-3932(95)01206-2. CrossRef
- Halfacree, K. (2004). Rethinking rurality. In T. Chapman & G. Hugo (Eds.), New forms of urbanization: Beyond the urban-rural dichotomy. Bodmin, Cornwall: MPG Books Ltd.
- Hawley, A. (1950). (Reprinted in 1986). Human ecology: A theoretical essay. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Homer, C., & Gallant, A. (2000). Partitioning the conterminous United States into mapping zones for Landsat TM land cover mapping. USGS, Chapter 1, National Mapping Division.
- Isserman, A. M. (2001). Competitive advantages of rural america in the next century. International Regional Science Review, 24(1), 38–58. doi:10.1177/016001701761013006. CrossRef
- Johnson, K. M., Nucci, A., & Long, L. (2005). Population trends in metropolitan America: Selective deconcentration and the rural rebound. Population Research and Policy Review, 24, 527–542. doi:10.1007/s11113-005-4479-1. CrossRef
- Luloff, A. E., & Befort, W. A. (1989). Land use change and aerial photography: Lessons for applied sociology. Rural Sociology, 54(1), 92–105.
- Lichter, D. T., & Fuguitt, G. V. (1982). The transition of nonmetropolitan population deconcentration. Demography, 19(2), 211–221. doi:10.2307/2061191. CrossRef
- Lichter, D. T., Fuguitt, G. V., & Heaton, T. B. (1985). Components of nonmetropolitan population change: The contribution of rural areas. Rural Sociology, 50(1), 88–98.
- Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- McCarthy, K. F., & Morrison, P. A. (1977). The changing demographic and economic structure of nonmetropolitan areas in the United States. Interregional Science Review, 2, 123–142. doi:10.1177/016001767700200202. CrossRef
- Menard, S. (2001). Applied logistic regression analysis, Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07–106. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Nelson, A. C., & Sanchez, T. W. (1999). Debunking the exurban myth: A comparison of suburban households. Housing Policy Debate, 10(3), 689–709.
- Ormsby, T., Napoleon, E., Burke, R., Groessl, C., & Feaster, L. (2001). Getting to Know ArcGIS Desktop: Basics of ArcView, ArcEditor, and ArcInfo. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
- Schnore, L. F. (1957). The growth of metropolitan suburbs. American Sociological Review, 22(2), 165–173. doi:10.2307/2088853. CrossRef
- Schnore, L. F. (1961). Geography and human ecology. Economic Geography, 37(3), 207–217. doi:10.2307/142087. CrossRef
- Theobald, D. M. (2001). Quantifying urban and rural sprawl using the sprawl index. Annual Association of American Geographers Conference, New York, NY.
- Thomas, J. K., & Howell, F. M. (2003). Metropolitan proximity and U.S. Agricultural Productivity, 1978–1997. Rural Sociology, 68(3), 366–386.
- Waldinger, R. (1996). Still the promised city? African Americans and new immigrants in postindustrial New York. London: Harvard University Press.
- Waldinger, R., & Bozorgmehr, M. (Eds.). (1996). Ethnic Los Angeles New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Whatmore, S. (1993). On doing rural research (or breaking the boundaries). Environment & Planning A, 32, 695–714.
- Wilkinson, K. P. (1991). The rural-urban variable in community research. In The community in rural America (pp. 37–59). Middleton, WS: Social Ecology Press.
- On the ‘Urbanness’ of Metropolitan Areas: Testing the Homogeneity Assumption, 1970–2000
Population Research and Policy Review
Volume 28, Issue 5 , pp 589-613
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Metropolitan classification
- Remote sensing
- Population trends 1970–2000
- Industry Sectors