Do Health Insurance and Residence Pattern the Likelihood of Tubal Sterilization among American Women?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
American women have increasingly opted for tubal sterilization or tubal ligation surgery in recent decades. While research has begun to examine the unequal access to health care in the United States, little research has considered how this may impact whether women opt for a tubal ligation surgery. We first profile women with and without tubal ligations using bivariate analysis of the most recent data available, a nationally representative sample of 7,643 women from the National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle 6 (NSFG, Public use data file, 2002). We then use logistic regression models to examine the relationship between having tubal ligation and two focal variables: (1) type of health insurance (Medicaid compared with private, government or military, and no health insurance), and (2) rural or urban place of residence. We find that women on Medicaid are nearly twice as likely to have had a tubal sterilization compared with women who have private health insurance coverage. Also, women on Medicaid are substantially more likely to have a tubal sterilization than women with government or military insurance and women with no health insurance (26% and 36%, respectively). Further, we find that women living in rural areas are nearly twice as likely to have a tubal sterilization, compared with women in urban or suburban areas, all else being equal.
- Adler, N. E., & Newman, K. (2002). Socioeconomic disparities in health: Pathways and policies. Health Affairs, 21, 60–76. CrossRef
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [David Hartley]. (2004). National healthcare disparities report: Summary. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nhdr03/nhdrsum03.htm (February).
- Aneshensel, C. S. (2002). Theory-based data analysis for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
- Blank, R. (2004). How poverty and policy are shaped by place. Perspectives on Poverty, Policy and Place. Rural Poverty Research Center, 4(3), 3–4.
- Borrero, S., Schwarz, E. B., Reeves, M. F., Bost, J. E., Creinin, M. D., & Ibrahim, S. A. (2007). Race, insurance status, and tubal sterilization. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 109, 94–100.
- Braveman, P. A., Egerter, S. A., Cubbin, C., & Marchi, K. S. (2004). An approach to studying social disparities in health and health care. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 2139–2148. CrossRef
- Costello, E. J., Compton, S. N., Keeler, G., & Angold, A. (2003). Relationships between poverty and psychopathology: A natural experiment. Journal of American Medical Association, 290, 2023–2029. CrossRef
- Cotter, D. A. (2003). Addressing person and place to alleviate rural poverty. Perspectives on Poverty, Policy and Place. Rural Poverty Research Center, 1(2), 9–10.
- Dryfoos, J. (1982). Contraceptive use, pregnancy intentions and pregnancy outcomes among U.S. women. Family Planning Perspectives, 14, 81–94. CrossRef
- Duncan, R. P., Seccombe, K., & Amey, C. (1995). Changes in health insurance coverage within rural and urban environments 1977–1987. Journal of Rural Health, 11, 169–176. CrossRef
- Freeman, V., Slifkin, R., Skinner, A., & Schwartz, R. (2005). Rural and urban parents report on access to health care for their children with Medicaid managed care. Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina Rural Health Research and Policy Analysis Center, University of North Carolina.
- Godecker, A., Thomson, E., & Bumpass, L. (2001). Union status, marital history and female contraceptive sterilization in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives, 33, 35–41, 49.
- Hartley, D. (2004). Rural health disparities, population health, and rural culture. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1675–1678. CrossRef
- Henshaw, S., & Singh, S. (1986). Sterilization regrets among U.S. couples. Family Planning Perspectives, 18, 238–240. CrossRef
- King, J., Geiger, L., Silberman, P., & Slifkin, R. (2007). State profiles of medicaid and SCHIP in rural and urban areas (Final Report No. 91). Washington, DC: United States Department of Health and Human Services.
- MacKay, A., Kieke, B., Jr., Koonin, L., & Beattie, K. (2001). Tubal sterilization in the United States, 1994–1996. Family Planning Perspectives, 33, 161–165. CrossRef
- Marcil-Gratton, N. (1988). Sterilization regret among women in metropolitan Montreal. Family Planning Perspectives, 20, 222–227. CrossRef
- Mosher, W. (1990). Contraceptive practice in the United States, 1982–1988. Family Planning Perspectives, 22, 198–205. CrossRef
- National Survey of Family Growth Cycle 6 (NSFG). (2002). Public use data file (Released for public use, 2004). Washington, DC: United States Department of Health and Human Services.
- Peek-Asa, C., Zwerling, C., & Stallones, L. (2004). Acute traumatic injuries in rural populations. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1689–1693. CrossRef
- Phillips, C. D., & McLeroy, K. R. (2004). Health in rural America: Remembering the importance of place. American Journal of Public Health, 94(10), 1661–1663. CrossRef
- Probst, J. C., Moore, C. G., Glover, S. H., & Samuels, M. E. (2004). Person and place: The compounding effects of race/ethnicity and rurality on health. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1695–1703. CrossRef
- Remez, L. (1991). Women sterilized before age 25 are most likely to regret their decision. Family Planning Perspectives, 23, 236–237. CrossRef
- Schnittker, J., & McLeod, J. D. (2005). The social psychology of health disparities. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 75–103. CrossRef
- Sered, S. S., & Fernandopulle, R. (2005). Uninsured in America: Life and death in the land of opportunity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- United States Census Bureau. (2005). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2004. Current population reports (pp. 60–229). Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau.
- United States Department of Health Human Services. (2004). Public use data file documentation: National Survey of Family Growth Cycle 6: 2002. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health and Human Services.
- Warehime, M. N., Bass, L. E., & Pedulla, D. (2007). Effects of tubal ligations among American women. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 52(4), 263–272.
- Do Health Insurance and Residence Pattern the Likelihood of Tubal Sterilization among American Women?
Population Research and Policy Review
Volume 28, Issue 2 , pp 237-249
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Tubal ligation
- Rural residence
- Health disparity
- Industry Sectors