Social programs and household size: evidence from New York city
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
What determines how many adults live in a house? How do people divide themselves up among households? Average household sizes vary substantially, both over time and in the cross-section. In this paper, we describe how a variety of government policies affect living arrangements, intentionally or not. Using data from a survey of households in New York City, we find that these incentives appear to have an impact. Specifically, households receiving these housing and income subsidies are smaller on average (measured by number of adults). The impacts appear to be considerably larger than those that would occur if the programs were lump-sum transfers. Small average household size can be extremely expensive in terms of physical and environmental resources, higher rents, and possibly homelessness. Thus, we encourage policymakers to pay greater heed to the provisions built into various social policies that favor smaller households.
- Acs, G., & Nelson, S. (2001). Honey, I’m home: Changes in living arrangements in the late 1990s. Series B, No. B-38. New federalism: National survey of America’s families. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
- Acs, G., & Nelson, S. (2002). Assessing the relationship between welfare policies and changes in living arrangements of low-income families and children in the late 1990s. Discussion paper 02–05, Assessing the new federalism. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
- Acs, G., & Nelson, S. (2004). Changes in living arrangements in the late 1990s: Do welfare policies matter? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(2), 273–290. CrossRef
- Alm, J., & Whittington, L. A. (1995). Income taxes and the marriage decision. Applied Economics, 27, 25–31. CrossRef
- Alm, J., & Whittington, L. A. (1997). Income taxes and the timing of marital decisions. Journal of Public Economics, 64, 219–240. CrossRef
- Alm, J., & Whittington, L. A. (1999). For love or money? The impact of income taxes on marriage. Economica, 66, 297–316. CrossRef
- Becker, S. O., Bentolila, S., Fernandex, A., & Ichino, A. (2004). Job insecurity and children’s emancipation. IZA discussion paper 1046.
- Beresford, J. C., & Rivlin, A. (1966). Privacy, poverty, and old age. Demography, 1, 247–258. CrossRef
- Bitler, M., Gelbach, J., & Hoynes, H. (2002). The impact of welfare reform on living arrangements. NBER working paper no. 8784, February. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Borsch-Supan, A. (1986). Household formation, housing prices, and public policy impact. Journal of Public Economics, 30, 145–164. CrossRef
- Community Service Society of New York (2002). Jiggetts Relief. Retrieved from http://www.cssny.org/home/socserv/jiggetts.html. Accessed on July 3, 2002.
- Costa, D. (1997). Displacing the family: Union Army pensions and elderly living arrangements. Journal of Political Economy, 105(4), 1269–1292. CrossRef
- Curtis, M. (2004). The impact of benefit levels and local economic conditions on the living arrangements of mothers. Unpublished mimeo. Columbia University.
- Edmonds, E., Mammen, K., & Miller, D. (2003). Rearranging the Family? Income Support and Elderly Living Arrangements in a Low Income Country, Barnard College working paper.
- Ellen, I. G., & O’Flaherty, B. (forthcoming). How New York housing policies are different—and maybe why. In I. Garfinkel & M. Meyers (Eds.), The welfare state in New York City. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Ellwood, D. T. (2000). The impact of the earned income tax credit and social policy reforms on work, marriage, and living arrangements. National Tax Journal, 53, 1063–1106.
- Englehardt, G., Gruber, J., & Perry, C. (2002). Social Security and elderly living arrangements. Working paper 8911. National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Freeman, L. (2003). Final report on Task Order #3. Report to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
- Garfinkel, I., & Meyers, M. K. (1997). New York City social indicators 1997 – A tale of many cities. New York City Social Indicators Data Center, Columbia University School of Social Work.
- Hendershott, P., & Smith, M. (1989). Transfer programs and aggregate household formation. Population Research and Policy Review, 8, 227–245. CrossRef
- Hobbs, F., & Stoops, N. (2002). Demographic trends in the 20th century. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Special Reports, Series CENSR-4. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Lazear, E. P., & Michael, R. T. (1980). Family size and the distribution of per capita income. American Economic Review, 70(March), 91–107.
- Lemieux, T., & Milligan, K. (2004). Incentive effects of social assistance: A regression discontinuity approach. Working paper 10541, National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Malpezzi, S., & Vandell, K. (2002). Does the low-income housing tax credit increase the supply of housing? Journal of Housing Economics, 11(4), 360–380. CrossRef
- Mancuso, D. C., Lieberman, C. J., Lindler, V. S., & Moses, A. (2003). TANF leavers: Examining the relationship between receipt of housing assistance and post-TANF well-being. Cityscape, 6(2), 123–138.
- Miron, J. R. (1989). Household formation, affordability, and housing policy. Population Research and Policy Review, 8, 55–77. CrossRef
- Moffit, R. (1998). The effect of welfare on marriage and fertility. In R. Moffit (Ed.), Welfare, the family, and reproductive behavior (pp. 50–97). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy, 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
- Murray, M. P. (1999). Subsidized and unsubsidized housing stocks, 1935–1987: Crowding out and cointegration. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 18(1), 107–124. CrossRef
- Nagle, G. (2003). Comparing housing-assisted and unassisted welfare leavers in Massachusetts. Cityscape, 6(2), 139–158.
- New York City Department of Human Resources (2002). HRA facts. Retrieved from http://www.ci.nyc.ny.us/html/hra/html/hrafacts.html. Accessed June 26, 2002.
- O’Flaherty, B. (2003). Do housing and social programs make households too small? Evidence from New York City. Discussion paper 0203-07. Columbia University Economics Department.
- Sinai, T., & Waldfogel, J. (2005). Do low-income housing subsidies increase the occupied housing stock? Journal of Public Economics, 89(11–12), 2137–2164. CrossRef
- Smith, L. B., Rosen, K. T., Markandya, A., & Ullmo, P.-A. (1984). The demand for housing, household headship rates, and household formation: An international analysis. Urban Studies, 21, 407–414. CrossRef
- Susin, S. (2002). Rent vouchers and the price of low-income housing. Journal of Public Economics, 83(1), 109–152. CrossRef
- Susin, S. (2003). Longitudinal outcomes of subsidized housing recipients in matched survey and administrative data. Paper presented at the fall meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, November 2003, Washington, DC.
- Swartz, R. J. (2003). The housing situation for low-income families in Milwaukee. Cityscape, 6(2), 159–171.
- U.S. Bureau of the Census (2001). Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- U.S. House of Representatives (1998). Committee on Ways and Means, Background material and data on programs within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Urban Institute (2002). Welfare rule database. Retrieved from http://anfdata.urban.org/WRD/WRDWelcome.cfm. Accessed on June 26, 2002.
- Verma, N., & Hendra, R. (2003). Comparing outcomes for Los Angeles County’s HUD-assisted and unassisted welfare leavers. Cityscape, 6(2), 89–122.
- Winkler, A. (1992). The impact of housing costs on the living arrangements of single mothers. Journal of Urban Economics, 32, 388–403. CrossRef
- Zedlewski, S. R. (2002). The importance of housing benefits to welfare success. Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy and Urban Institute, April.
- Social programs and household size: evidence from New York city
Population Research and Policy Review
Volume 26, Issue 4 , pp 387-409
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Household size
- Housing subsidies
- Income subsidies
- New York
- Social programs
- Industry Sectors