Cross Pressure Scores: An Individual-Level Measure of Cumulative Partisan Pressures Arising from Social Group Memberships
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Early studies of voting behavior hypothesized that the degree to which an individual was “cross-pressured” might affect how she participates in politics. However, attention to this topic waned before returning in recent years, mainly within the narrower confines of social networks analysis. In an effort to encourage broader consideration of the role of cross-pressures in political behavior, we present a new approach to estimating cross-pressures that (1) is individual-specific, (2) reflects the cumulative cross-pressures faced by an individual from her many intersecting social strata and group memberships, irrespective of the mechanism by which those pressures are experienced, and (3) can be estimated using widely-available data in party systems of any size, thus making it easier to study the effect of cross-pressures cross-nationally and over time. We demonstrate that these estimates are robust to many estimation choices, correspond well to existing measures of cross-pressures, and are correlated with patterns of political engagement and participation predicted by extant theories.
- Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546. CrossRef
- Basinger, S. J., & Lavine, H. (2005). Ambivalence, information, and electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 99(2), 169–184. CrossRef
- Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Brader, T., & Tucker, J. A. (2008). Pathways to partisanship: Evidence from Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 24(3), 1–38. CrossRef
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
- Converse, P. E., & Campbell, A. (1968). Political standards in secondary groups. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (3rd ed., pp. 199–211). New York: Harper & Row.
- Craig, S. C., & Martinez, M. D. (Eds.). (2005). Ambivalence and the structure of political opinion. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Dalton, R. J., & Wattenberg, M. P. (Eds.). (2000). Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Eveland, W. P, Jr, & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and ‘heterogeneity’ of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59, 205–224. CrossRef
- Hillygus, D. S., & Shields, T. G. (2008). The persuadable voter: Wedge issues in presidential campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Horan, P. M. (1971). Social positions and political cross-pressures: A re-examination. American Sociological Review, 36(4), 650–660. CrossRef
- Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95.
- Huckfeldt, R., Ikeda, K., & Pappi, F. U. (2005). Patterns of disagreement in democratic politics: Comparing Germany, Japan, and the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 497–514. CrossRef
- Jang, S.-J. (2009). Are diverse political networks always bad for participatory democracy? Indifference, alienation, and political disagreements. American Politics Research, 37(5), 879–899. CrossRef
- Knoke, D. (1990). Political networks: The structuralist perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- La Due Lake, R., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19(3), 567–584. CrossRef
- Lavine, H. (2001). The electoral consequences of ambivalence toward presidential candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 915–929. CrossRef
- Lazarsfeld, P. F., Gaudet, H., & Berelson, B. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Duell Sloan and Pearce.
- Leighley, J. E. (1990). Social interaction and contextual influences on political participation. American Politics Research, 18, 459–475. CrossRef
- Markowski, R., & Tucker, J. A. (2010). Euroskepticism and the emergence of political parties in Poland. Party Politics, 16(4), 532–548. CrossRef
- McClurg, S. D. (2006a). The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 737–754. CrossRef
- McClurg, S. D. (2006b). Political disagreement in context: The conditional effect of neighborhood context, disagreement, and political talk on electoral participation. Political Behavior, 28, 349–366. CrossRef
- Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855. CrossRef
- Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140–155.
- Nie, N. H., Verba, S., & Petrocik, J. (1976). The changing American voter. Cambridge: Harvard Univ Press.
- Nir, L. (2005). Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(4), 422–442. CrossRef
- Powell, G. B, Jr. (1976). Political cleavage structure, cross-pressure processes, and partisanship: An empirical test of the theory. American Journal of Political Science, 20(1), 1–23. CrossRef
- Scheufele, D. A., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I. S., & Nisbet, E. (2006). Journal of Communication, 56, 728–753. CrossRef
- Shanks, J. M., & Miller, W. E. (1990). Policy direction and performance evaluation: Complementary explanations of the Reagan elections. British Journal of Political Science, 20(2), 143–235. CrossRef
- Treier, S., & Jackman, S. (2008). Democracy as a latent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 201–217. CrossRef
- Walsh, K. C. (2003). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
- Yoo, S.-J. (2010). Two types of neutrality: Ambivalence versus indifference and political participation. Journal of Politics, 72(1), 163–177.
- Zuckerman, A. S. (2005a). Returning to the social logic of politics. In A. S. Zuckerman (Ed.), The social logic of politics: Personal networks as contexts for political behavior (pp. 3–20). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
- Zuckerman, A. S. (2005b). The social logic of politics: Personal networks as contexts for political behavior. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
- Cross Pressure Scores: An Individual-Level Measure of Cumulative Partisan Pressures Arising from Social Group Memberships
Volume 36, Issue 1 , pp 23-51
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Cross pressures
- Social groups
- Political participation
- Political behavior
- United States
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA
- 2. New York University, 19 West 4th Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY, 10012, USA
- 3. Lightbox Analytics, 1709 North Fuller Ave. #3, Los Angeles, CA, 90046, USA