Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? Journal of Politics,
Adams, G. D. (1997). Abortion: Evidence of an issue evolution. American Journal of Political Science,
Alvarez, R. M., & Brehm, J. (2002). Hard choices, easy answers: Values, information, and American public opinion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., & Snyder, J. M., Jr. (2006). Purple America. Journal of Economic Perspectives,
Armitage, C. J., & M. Conner. (2005). Attitudinal ambivalence and political opinion: Avenues for further research. In S. C. Craig & M. D. Martinez (Eds.), Ambivalence, politics, and public policy (pp. 144–166). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bafumi, J., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2009). A new partisan voter. Journal of Politics,
Bartels, L. M. (1998). Electoral continuity and change, 1868–1996. Electoral Studies,
Bartels, L. M. (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952–1996. American Journal of Political Science,
Basinger, C. J., & Lavine, H. (2005). Ambivalence, information, and electoral choice. American Political Science Review,
Breckler, S. J. (1994). A comparison of numerical indexes for measuring attitude ambivalence. Educational and Psychological Measurement,
Burden, B. C., & Frisby, T, M. (2004). Preferences, partisanship, and whip activity in the U.S. house of representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly,
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carmines, E. G., McIver, J., & Stimson, J. A. (1987). Unrealized partisanship: A theory of dealignment. Journal of Politics,
Claassen, R. L., & Highton, B. (2009). Policy polarization among party elites and the significance of political awareness in the mass public. Political Research Quarterly,
Converse, P. E. (1969). Of time and partisan stability. Comparative Political Studies,
Dow, J. K. (2008). Gender differences in political knowledge: Distinguishing characteristics-based and returns-based differences. Political Behavior,
Feldman, S., & Zaller, J. (1992). The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science,
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2006). Culture war?: The myth of a polarized America (2nd ed). New York: Pearson Longman.
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2008). Polarization in the American public: Misconceptions and misreadings. Journal of Politics,
Fiorina, M. P., & Levendusky, M. S. (2006). Disconnected: The political class versus the people. In P. S. Nivola & D. W. Brady (Eds.), Red and blue nation? Characteristics and causes of America’s polarized politics. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
Fleisher, R., & Bond, J. R. (2004). The shrinking middle in the U.S. congress. British Journal of Political Science,
Forgette, R. (2004). Party caucuses and coordination: Assessing caucus activity and party effects. Legislative Studies Quarterly,
Gaines, B. J., Kuklinksi, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. Journal of Politics,
Goren, P. (2005). Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science,
Granberg, D., & Holmberg, S. (1990). The Berelson paradox reconsidered: Intention-behavior changes in U.S. and Swedish election campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly,
Han, H., & Brady, D. W. (2007). A delayed return to historical norms: Congressional party polarization after the second world war. British Journal of Political Science,
Hetherington, M. J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review,
Hetherington, M. J. (2008). Turned off or turned on? How polarization affects political engagement. In P. Nivola & D. Brady (Eds.), Red and blue nation (Vol. 2). Washington: Brookings Institution Press and the Hoover Institution.
Hetherington, M. J. (2009). Putting polarization in perspective. British Journal of Political Science,
Huckfeldt, R., Morehouse Mendez, J., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology,
Jacobson, G. C. (2007). A divider, not a uniter: George W. Bush and the American people, The 2006 election and beyond. New York: Pearson Longman.
Jacoby, W. G. (1988). The impact of party identification on issue attitudes. American Journal of Political Science,
Keele, L., & Wolak, J. (2008). Contextual sources of ambivalence. Political Psychology,
Konda, T. M., & Sigelman, L. (1987). Public evaluations of the parties, 1952–1984. Journal of Politics,
Lavine, H. (2001). The electoral consequences of ambivalence toward presidential candidates. American Journal of Political Science,
Levendusky, M. S. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became democrats and conservatives became republicans
. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Levendusky, M. S. (2011). Red states vs. blue states: Going beyond the mean”. Public Opinion Quarterly,
McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Meffert, M. F., Guge, M., & Lodge, M. (2004). Good, bad, indifferent and ambivalent: The consequence of multidimensional political attitudes. In W. E. Saris & P. M. Sniderman (Eds.), The issue of belief: Essays in the intersection of non-attitudes and attitude change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Miller, J. M., & Peterson, D. A. M. (2004). Theoretical and empirical implications of attitude strength. Journal of Politics,
Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science,
Nie, N. H., Verba, S., & Petrocik, J. R. (1979). The changing American voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press Cambridge.
Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1984). The polarization of American politics. Journal of Politics,
Rohde, D. W. (1991). Parties and leaders in the postreform House
. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Rudolph, T. J. (2005). Group attachment and the reduction of value-driven ambivalence. Political Psychology,
Rudolph, T. J., & Popp, E. J. (2007). An information processing theory of ambivalence. Political Psychology,
Schlesinger, J. A. (1985). The new American political party. American Political Science Review,
Sniderman, P., Brody, R., & Tetlock, P. (1991). Reasoning and choice
. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Stimson, J. A. (1999). Public opinion in America: Moods, cycles, and swings (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview.
Stimson, J. A. (2004). Tides of consent: How public opinion shapes American politics
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In J. Krosnick (Ed.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Thornton, J. R. (2011). Ambivalent or indifferent? Examining the validity of an objective measure of partisan ambivalence. Political Psychology,
Wattenberg, M. P. (1984). The decline of American political parties, 1952–1980. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wattenberg, M. P. (1994). The decline of American political parties, 1952–1992. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Yoo, S. (2010). Two types of neutrality: Ambivalence versus indifference and political participation. Journal of Politics,