Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Alvarez, R. M. (1997). Information and elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Andreoli, V., & Worchel, S. (1978). Effects of media, communicator and message position on attitude change. Public Opinion Quarterly,
Arceneaux, K. (2010). The benefits of experimental methods for the study of campaign effects. Political Communication,
Arceneaux, K., & Kolodny, R. (2009). Educating the least informed: Group endorsements in a grassroots campaign. American Journal of Political Science,
Aronson, E., Turner, J., & Carlsmith, M. (1963). Communicator credibility and communicator discrepancy as determinants of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
Boatright, R. G., Malbin, M. J., Rozell, M. J., Skinner, R. M., & Wilcox, C. (2003). BCRA’s impact on interest groups and advocacy organizations. In M. J. Malbin (Ed.), Life after reform: When the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act meets politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Brady, H. E., & Sniderman, P. M. (1985). Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review,
Brewer, P., & Gross, K. (2005). Values, framing, and citizens’ thoughts about policy issues: Effects on content and quantity. Political Psychology,
Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1989). Candidate perception in an ambiguous world: Campaigns, cues, and inference processes. American Political Science Review,
Druckman, J. (2001a). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics,
Druckman, J. (2001b). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior,
Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Fowler, E. F., & Ridout, T. N. (2010). Advertising trends in 2010. The Forum, 8(4), Article 4.
Franz, M. M. (2008). Choices and changes: Interest groups in the electoral process. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
French, J. (1956). A formal theory of social power. Psychological Review,
French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Garramone, G. M. (1985). Effects of negative political advertising: The roles of sponsor and rebuttal. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,
Gross, D. A., & Goidel, R. K. (2003). The states of campaign finance reform. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Hartman, T., & Weber, C. (2009). Who said what? The effects of source cues in issue frames. Political Behavior,
Heaney, M. T. (2007). Identity crisis: How interest groups struggle to define themselves in Washington. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (pp. 279–300). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Hogan, R. E. (2005). State campaign finance laws and interest group electioneering activities. The Journal of Politics,
Hovland, C., & Mandell, W. (1957). Is there a ‘law of primacy’ in persuasion? In C. Hovland (Ed.), The order of presentation in persuasion (pp. 1–22). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly,
Jaccard, J. (2001). Interaction effects in logistic regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Johnson, T., & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising is believing? Comparing internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,
Kaid, L. L. (1981). Political advertising. In D. D. Nimmo & K. R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of political communication. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Kam, C. D. (2005). Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences. Political Behavior,
Kelman, H. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution,
Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Kuklinski, J., & Hurley, N. (1994). On hearing and interpreting political messages: A cautionary tale of cue taking. The Journal of Politics,
Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science,
Lavine, H., Borgida, E., & Sullivan, J. (2000). On the relationship between attitude involvement and attitude accessibility: Toward a cognitive-motivational model of political information processing. Political Psychology,
Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice; how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Duell.
Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts vs. encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review,
Magleby, D. B., & Tanner, J. W. (2004). Interest-group electioneering in the 2002 congressional elections. In D. B. Magleby & J. Q. Monson (Eds.), The last hurrah? Soft money and issue advocacy in the 2002 congressional elections. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Martinelli, K. A., & Chaffee, S. H. (1995). Measuring new-voter learning via three channels of political information. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,
Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McGuire, W. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 136–314). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Mondak, J. J. (1990). Perceived legitimacy of Supreme Court decisions: Three functions of source credibility. Political Behavior,
Mondak, J. J. (1993). Public opinion and heuristic processing of source cues. Political Behavior,
Pfau, M., Park, D., Holbert, R. L., & Cho, J. (2001). The effects of party and PAC-sponsored issue advertising and the potential of inoculation to combat its impact on the democratic process. American Behavioral Scientist,
Salmon, C. T., Reid, L. N., Pokrywczynsk, J., & Willett, R. W. (1985). The effectiveness of advocacy advertising relative to news coverage. Communication Research,
Semiatin, R. J., & Rozell, M. J. (2005). Interest groups in congressional elections. In R. G. Shaiko, P. S. Herrnson, & C. Wilcox (Eds.), The interest group connection: Electioneering, lobbying, and policymaking in Washington (pp. 75–88). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Shen, F., & Wu, H. D. (2002). Effects of soft-money issue advertisements on candidate evaluations and voting preference: An exploration. Mass Communication and Society,
Sobel, J. (1985). A theory of credibility. Review of Economic Studies,
Tomz, M., & Sniderman, P. (2004). Brand names and the organization of mass belief systems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
Turner, J. (2007). The messenger overwhelming the message: Ideological cues and perceptions of bias in television news. Political Behavior,
Walster, E., & Festinger, L. (1962). The effectiveness of “over-heard” persuasive communications. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology,
West, D. M., & Loomis, B. A. (1999). The sound of money: How political interests get what they want. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
Worchel, S., Andreoli, V., & Eason, J. (1975). Is the medium the message: A study of the effects of media, communication, and message characteristics on attitude change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
Zaller, J. R. (1989). Bringing converse back in: Modeling information flow in political campaigns. Political Analysis,
Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion
. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zhao, X., & Chaffee, S. (1995). Campaign advertisements versus television news as sources of political issue information. Public Opinion Quarterly,