The Dynamics of Critical Realignments: An Analysis Across Time and Space
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Much of the scholarly interest in critical realignments results from the pivotal role that ordinary citizens play during these periods. By altering their voting behavior, citizens hold political elites accountable and forge non-incremental change in policy outputs. A central question regarding realignments is thus how are citizens changing their behavior to hold elites accountable? Are citizens producing realignments by converting from one party to the opposition? Are previous non-voters becoming mobilized in response to emerging issues or crises? Or are one party’s supporters disproportionately abstaining from voting and altering the partisan balance in the process? This article makes four central contributions to our understanding of these realignment processes, or dynamics. We present a theoretical framework for the analysis of realignment dynamics, based upon the Michigan model of voting and its conception of the normal vote. Where previous dynamics studies have collectively only examined two realignments, we examine the dynamics of all presidential realignments in American electoral history. Where previous studies have often focused on national, sectional, or state levels of analysis, we focus on city- and county-level realignments, a critical advancement for an inherently local-level phenomenon such as critical realignments. Finally, unlike previous studies, we identify the factors that promote particular realignment dynamics. We find that the conversion of active partisans has produced most of the enduring change in voting behavior in the United States, with the relative contribution of different dynamics varying both across time and space. Political factors such as the strength of state and local parties and demographic factors such as changes in the size of local immigrant populations have each favored particular realignment dynamics in American electoral history.
- Andersen, K. (1979). The creation of a democratic majority, 1928–1936. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Beck, P. A. (1974). A socialization theory of partisan realignment. In R. G. Niemi, et al. (Eds.), The politics of future citizens. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Beck, P. A. (1982). Realignment begins? The Republican surge in the south. American Politics Quarterly, 10, 421–438. CrossRef
- Binkley, W. E. (1943). American political parties: Their natural history. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
- Brown, C. (1991). Ballots of tumult: A portrait of volatility in American voting. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
- Burnham, W. D. (1970). Critical elections and the mainsprings of American politics. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
- Campbell, J. E. (1985). Sources of the new deal realignment: The contributions of conversion and mobilization to partisan change. Western Political Quarterly, 38, 357–376. CrossRef
- Campbell, A., Angus, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: Wiley.
- Clubb, J., Flanigan, W. H., & Zingale, N. (1980). Partisan realignment: Voters, parties, and government in American history. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
- Converse, P. E. (1966). The concept of a normal vote. In A. Campbell, P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, & D. E. Stokes (Eds.), Elections and the political order. New York: Wiley.
- Darmofal, D. (2008). The political geography of the new deal realignment. American Politics Research, 36(6), 934–961. CrossRef
- Erikson, R. S., & Tedin, K. L. (1981). The 1928–1936 partisan realignment: The case for the conversion hypothesis. American Political Science Review, 75, 951–962. CrossRef
- Key, V. O., Jr. (1955). A theory of critical elections. Journal of Politics, 17, 3–18.
- Key, V. O., Jr. (1959). Secular realignment and the party system. Journal of Politics, 21, 198–210. CrossRef
- Kleppner, P. (1987). Continuity and change in electoral politics, 1893–1928. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
- Ladd, E. C., Jr., & Hadley, C. D. (1978). Transformations of the American party system. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
- MacRae, D., Jr., & Meldrum, J. A. (1960). Critical elections in Illinois: 1888–1958. American Political Science Review, 54(3), 669–683. CrossRef
- Nardulli, P. F. (1995). The concept of a critical realignment, electoral behavior, and political change. American Political Science Review, 89(1), 10–22. CrossRef
- Nardulli, P. F. (2005). Popular efficacy in the democratic era: A reexamination of electoral accountability in the United States, 1828–2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Niemi, R. G., Katz, R. S., & Newman, D. (1980). Reconstructing past partisanship: The failure of the party identification recall questions. American Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 633–651. CrossRef
- Shively, W. P. (1992). From differential abstention to conversion: A change in electoral change, 1864–1988. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 309–330. CrossRef
- Sundquist, J. L. (1983). Dynamics of the party system: Alignment and realignment of political parties in the United States. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
- Wanat, J., & Burke, K. (1982). Estimating the degree of mobilization and conversion in the 1890s: An inquiry into the nature of electoral change. American Political Science Review, 76, 360–370. CrossRef
- The Dynamics of Critical Realignments: An Analysis Across Time and Space
Volume 32, Issue 2 , pp 255-283
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Political Science, University of South Carolina, 350 Gambrell Hall, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
- 2. Department of Political Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
- 3. College of Law, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
- 4. Cline Center for Democracy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Suite 207 Strata Building, 2001 South First Street, Champaign, IL, 61820-7461, USA