Conflict, Fusion, or Coexistence? The Complexity of Contemporary American Conservatism
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper draws on an original survey and on the 2004 NES to explore the complexity of contemporary American conservatism. In both datasets, we find evidence that economic and cultural conservatism stand as distinct strands of conservative attitudes. The original survey also allows us to further explore the role of beliefs about the market in economic conservatism. In the end, we find little support for either liberal hopes of fundamental ideological conflict among conservatives or conservative hopes of ideological fusion. Instead, our data suggests that a particular type of ideological coexistence among economic and cultural conservatives is the norm.
- Adams, G. (1997). Abortion: Evidence of an issue evolution. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 718–737. CrossRef
- Bartlett, B. (2006). Imposter: How George W. Bush bankrupted American and betrayed the Reagan legacy. Doubleday.
- Bartels, L. (2006). What’s the matter with what’s the matter with Kansas. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1(2), 201–226. CrossRef
- Bolce L., & DeMaio, G. (1998). The anti-christian factor in contemporary politics. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 502–542.
- Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 617–45. CrossRef
- Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: David, E. (Ed.), Ideology and Discontent, Apter (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.
- Converse, P. E., & Markus, G. B. (1979). Plus Ça change … The new CPS election study panel. American Political Science Review, 73, 32–49. CrossRef
- Cross, G. S. (2000). An all-consuming century: Why commercialism won in modern America. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Dionne, E. J. (2006). The great republican rebranding. The Washington Post, May 6, Page A17.
- Ellis, C., & Stimson, J. A. (2007a) On symbolic conservatism in America. Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association. Chicago, IL.
- Ellis, C., & Stimson, J. A. (2007b) Pathways to ideology in American politics: The Operational-Symbolic ‘Paradox’ Revisited. Unpublished manuscript.
- Frank, T. (2000). One market under God: Extreme capitalism, market Populism, and the end of economy democracy. Doubleday Press.
- Frank, T. (2004). What’s the matter with Kansas? How conservatives won the heart of America. Metropolitan Books.
- Gaffaney, T. J. (1999). Citizens of the market: The un-political theory of the new right. Polity, 32 (Winter), 179–202. CrossRef
- Hart, J. (2005). The making of the American conservative mind: National review and its times. Intercollegiate Studies Institute.
- Hillygus, D. S., & Shields, T. G. (2005). Moral issues and voter decision making in the 2004 Presidential election. PS: Political Science and Politics, 38(April), 201–210.
- Himmelstein, J. (1992). To the right: The transformation of American conservatism. University of California Press.
- Jacoby, W. G. (1991). Ideological identification and issue attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 178–205. CrossRef
- Kristol, W. (2005). The weekly standard: A reader: 1995–2005.
- Layman, G. (2001). The great divide: Religious and cultural conflict in American party politics. Columbia University Press.
- Layman, G., & Carmines, E. G. (1997). Cultural conflict in American politics: Religious traditionalism postmaterialism and US political behavior. Journal of Politics, 59(3), 751–77. CrossRef
- McCloskey, H., & Zaller, J. (1984). The American ethos: Public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Meyer, D. (2004). The anatomy of a myth: How did one exit poll answer become the story of how Bush won? Good question. The Washington Post, December 5, Sec. B, p. 1.
- Nagourney, A. (2005). Democrats entangled: So what happened in that election, anyhow? The New York Times, January 2, Sec. 4, p. 3.
- Nie, N. H., & Andersen, K. (1974). Mass belief systems revisited: Political change and attitude structure. Journal of Politics, 36, 540–587. CrossRef
- Reich, R. (2002). The future of success: Working and living in the new economy. Vintage Press.
- Rudolph, T. J., & Evans, J. (2005). Political trust, ideology and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 660–671. CrossRef
- Sandel, M. J. (1996). Democracy’s discontent: America in search of public policy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Sears, D., Lau, R. R., Tyler, T. R., & Allen, H. M. Jr. (1980). Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and Presidential voting. American Political Science Review, 74, 670–684. CrossRef
- Sirota, D. J. (2004). The democrats’ DaVinci code. The American Prospect Online, December 8.
- Stimson, J. A. (2004). Tides of discontent. University of Cambridge Press.
- Sullivan, J. L., Piereson, J. E., & Marcus, G. E. (1978). Ideological constraint in the mass public: A methodolodical critique and some new findings. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 233–249. CrossRef
- Sunstein, C. R. (1999). Free markets and social justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Conflict, Fusion, or Coexistence? The Complexity of Contemporary American Conservatism
Volume 30, Issue 2 , pp 199-221
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links