Achen, Christopher H. (1992). Social psychology, demographic variables, and linear regression: Breaking the iron triangle in voting research. Political Behavior,
Aronson, Elliot, Wilson, Timothy D., & Brewer, Marilynn B. (1998). Experimentation in social psychology. In Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, & Gardner Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 99–142). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Brooks, Deborah Jordan, & Geer, John G. (2007). Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51
Campbell, Donald, & Stanley, Julian C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Childers, Terry L., Pride, William M., & Ferrell, O. C. (1980). A reassessment of the effects of appeals on response to mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 17
Cook, Thomas D., & Campbell, Donald T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., & Keeter, Scott (1993). Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science, 37
Dillman, Don A. (1991). The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Reviews of Sociology, 17
Dillman, Don A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Dillman, Don A., Singer, Eleanor, Clark, Jon R., & Treat, James B. (1996). Effects of benefits appeals, mandatory appeals, and variations in statements of confidentiality on completion rates for Census questionnaires. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60
Dobbins, Gregory H., Lane, Irving M., & Steiner, Dirk D. (1988). A note on the role of laboratory methodologies in applied behavioural research: Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9
Druckman, James N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98, 671–686.
Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., & Lupia, Arthur (2006). The growth and development of experimental research in political science. American Political Science Review, 100, 627–635.
Druckman, James N., & Nelson, Kjersten R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47
Fowler, James H., & Kam, Cindy D. (2006). Patience as a political virtue: Delayed gratification and turnout. Political Behavior, 28, 113–128.
Funk, Carolyn L. (1997). Implications of political expertise in candidate trait evaluations. Political Research Quarterly, 50 , 675–697.
Gerber, Alan S., & Green, Donald P. (2000a). The effect of a nonpartisan get-out-the-vote drive: An experimental study of leafletting. Journal of Politics, 62
Gerber, Alan S., & Green, Donald P. (2000b). The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 94
Gordon, Michael E., Slade, L. A., & Schmitt, Neal (1986). The ‘science’ of the sophomore revisited: From conjecture to empiricism. The Academy of Management Review, 11
Gordon, Michael E., Slade, L. A., & Schmitt, Neal (1987). Student guinea pigs: Porcine predictors and particularistic phenomena. The Academy of Management Review, 12
Green, Donald, & Gerber, Alan (2002). Reclaiming the experimental tradition in political science. In Ira Katzelnson & Helen V. Milner (Eds.), Political science: State of the discipline (pp. 803–832). New York: Norton.
Greenberg, Jerald (1987). The college sophomore as guinea pig: Setting the record straight. The Academy of Management Review, 12
Groves, Robert M., Cialdini, Robert B., & Couper, Mick P. (1992). Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56
Henrich, Joseph (2000). Does culture matter in economic behavior? Ultimatum game bargaining among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon. American Economic Review, 90
Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, Bowles, Samuel, & Camerer, Colin et al. (2004). In search of homo economicus: Behavior experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review, 91
Houston, Michael J., & Nevin, John R. (1977). The effects of source and appeal on mail survey response patterns. Journal of Marketing Research, 14
Ishiyama, John T., & Hartlaub, Stephen (2002). Does the wording of syllabi affect student course assessment in introductory political science classes? PS: Political Science and Politics, 35, 567–570.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin, & Geer, John G. (1994). Creating impressions: An experimental investigation of political advertising on television. Political Behavior, 16
Kam, Cindy D. (2005). Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences. Political Behavior,
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., & Verba, Sidney (1994). Designing social inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Kropf, Martha E., & Blair, Johnny (2005). Eliciting survey cooperation: Incentives, self-interest, and norms of cooperation. Evaluation Review,
Lupia, Arthur. (2002). New ideas in experimental political science. Political Analysis, 10
McDermott, Rose (2002a). Experimental methodology in political science. Political Analysis, 10
McDermott, Rose (2002b). Experimental methods in political science. Annual Reviews of Political Science, 5
McGraw, Kathleen M., & Hoekstra, Valerie (1994). Experimentation in political science: Historical trends and future directions. In Michael X. Delli Carpini, Leonie Huddy, & Robert Y. Shapiro. (Eds.), Research in Micropolitics Vol 4: New Directions in Political Psychology, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Merolla, Jennifer, Stephenson, Laura, & Zechmeister, Elizabeth J. (2007). Applying experimental methods to the study of information shortcuts in Mexico. Política y Gobierno, 14, 117–142.
Miller, Joanne A., & Krosnick, Jon A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 295–309.
Mintz, Alex, Redd, Steven B., & Vedlitz, Arnold. (2006). Can we generalize from student experiments to the real world in political science, military affairs, and international relations? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50
Mintz, Alez, & Geva, Nehemia (1993). Why don’t democracies fight each other? An experimental study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37
Morton, Rebecca B., & Williams, Kenneth C. (Forthcoming). Experimentation in political science. In Janet Box-Steffensmeier, David Collier, & Henry Brady (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology.
Peterson, Robert A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28
Porter, Stephen R. (2004). Raising responses: What works? New Directions for Institutional Research Spring: 5–21.
Scott, John T., Matland, Richard E., Michelbach, Philip A., & Bornstein, Brain H. (2001). Just deserts: An experimental study of distributive justice norms. American Journal of Political Science, 45
Sears, David O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51
Shafir, Eldar, Simonson, Itamar, & Tversky, Amos (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49
Sigelman, Lee, Sigelman, Carol K., & Bullock, David (1991). Reconsidering pocketbook voting: An experimental approach. Political Behavior, 13
Slade, L. Allen, & Gordon, Michael E. (1988). On the virtues of laboratory babies and student bath water: A reply to Dobbins, Lane, and Steiner. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9
Stenner, Karen (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Transue, John E. (2007). Identity salience, identity acceptance, and racial policy attitudes: American national identity as a united force. American Journal of Political Science, 51
Webster, Cynthia (1997). Effects of researcher presence and appeal on response quality in hand-delivered, self-administered surveys. Journal of Business Research, 38