Analyzing the representativeness
of internet political participation
Cite this article as: Best, S.J. & Krueger, B.S. Polit Behav (2005) 27: 183. doi:10.1007/s11109-005-3242-y Abstract
Political participation researchers have developed several evaluative techniques to assess the representativeness of political participation patterns. Yet, while the Internet has become a mainstream avenue for political participation in the United States, current assessments of online participation insufficiently apply these methods. To incorporate these methods we begin by drawing upon resource theory to inform two-stage ordered-logit models of online and offline political participation. Our results suggest that the factors predicting online participation often differ from the factors that predict offline participation. Even so, we find that those from higher socioeconomic backgrounds tend to disproportionately possess these distinct online determinants. Next, we use a wide spectrum of political opinion questions to determine whether online participators’ opinions reflect or distort those of the general population. Overall, we find that online participation tends to relate moderately with liberal preferences. However, because offline participation relates to political attitudes similarly, the Internet only marginally advantages the political voice of liberals. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results.
Keywords political participation Internet public opinion political representation resource theory References Alvarez, Michael R., Hall, Thad 2004Point, Click, and Vote Brookings Washington, DC Google Scholar Bartels, Larry 1991. Instrumental and quasi-instrumental variables American Journal of Political Science 35 777 800 Google Scholar Bennett, Stephen Earl, Resnick, David 1990 The implications of nonvoting for democracy in the United States American Journal of Political Science 34 771 802 Google Scholar Bimber, Bruce 1999. The Internet and citizen communication with government: does the medium matter? Political Communication 16 409 428 Google Scholar Bimber, Bruce 2000. The study of information technology and civic engagement Political Communication 17 329 333 Google Scholar Bimber, Bruce 2003Information and American Democracy Cambridge University Press Cambridge Google Scholar Brady, Henry, Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman 1995 Beyond ses: a resource model of political participation American Political Science Review 89 271 294 Google Scholar Bucy, Erik 2000. Social access to the Internet Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics 5 50 61 Google Scholar Bucy, Erik, Gregson, Kimberly 2001 Media participation: a legitimizing mechanism of mass democracy New Media and Society 3 357 380 Google Scholar
Center for Survey Research & Analysis (2003). Data obtained from the survey center at the University of Connecticut
Chatterjee, Samprit, Hadi, Ali, Price, Bertram 1999Regression Analysis by Example Wiley New York Google Scholar Conway, M. Margaret 1991Political Participation in the United States CQ Press Washington Google Scholar Cornfield, Michael 2004. New and improved Campaign & Elections 25 42 Google Scholar
Cornfield, Michael, Lee Rainie, and John Horrigan (2003). Untuned keyboards: online campaigners, citizens, and portals in the 2002 elections.
A Pew Internet and American Life Project Dahl, Robert 1989Democracy and its Critics Yale University Press New Haven Google Scholar Davis, Richard, Owen, Diana 1998New Media and American Politics Oxford University Press New York Google Scholar Delli Carpini, Michael 2000. Gen.com: youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment Political Communication 17 341 349 Google Scholar Fox, John 1991Regression Diagnostics Sage Publication Newbury Park Google Scholar Gant, Michael, Lyons, William 1993 Democratic theory, nonvoting, and public policy American Politics Quarterly 21 185 204 Google Scholar Grubesic, Tony, Murray, Alan 2002 Constructing the divide: spatial disparities in broadband access Papers in Regional Science 81 197 221 Google Scholar Hill, Quaile Kim, Jan E., Leighley 1992 The policy consequences of class bias in state electorates American Journal of Political Science 36 351 65 Google Scholar Johnson, Thomas, Kaye, Barbara 2003 A boost or bust for democracy? Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics 8 9 34 Google Scholar Keeter, Scott, Miller, Carolyn, Kohut, Andrew, Groves, Robert M., Presser, Stanley 2000 Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a large national telephone survey Public Opinion Quarterly 64 125 148 PubMed Google Scholar
Kiesler, Sara, Zdaniuk, Bozena, Lundmark, Vicki, and Kraut, Robert (2000). Trobules with the Internet: The dynamics of help at home.
Human-Computer Interaction 15: 323–351 Kling, Robert 1999. What is social informatics and why does it matter? D-Lib Magazine 5 1 30 Google Scholar Krueger, Brian 2002. Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: a resource approach American Politics Research 30 476 498 Google Scholar Lau, Richard, Pomper, Gerald 2002 Effectiveness of negative campaigning in U.S. Senate elections American Journal of Political Science 46 47 67 Google Scholar
Leigh, Andrew, and Atkinson, Robert (2001). Clear thinking on the digital divide. Paper published by The Progressive Policy Institute
Levy, Steven 2004. Dean’s net effect is just the start Newsweek 143 73 Google Scholar Lijphart, Arend 1997. Unequal participation: democracy’s unresolved dilemma American Political Science Review 91 1 14 Google Scholar Murdock, Graham, Golding, Peter 1989 Information poverty and political inequality: citizenship in the age of privatized communications Journal of Communication 39 180 193 Google Scholar
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2000). Falling through the net: toward digital inclusion. Report published by the U.S. Department of Commerce
Norris, Pippa (2002). Political campaigning on the Internet: business as usual? In Kamarck, Elaine and Joseph Nye, Jr. (eds.),
Governance.com. Washington, D.C.: Brookings
Norris, Pippa (1999). Who surfs? new technology, old voters and virtual democracy in the 1996 and 1998 US elections.
Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference Putnam, Robert 2000Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community Simon & Schuster New York Google Scholar Radcliff, Benjamin 1994. Turnout and the Democratic vote American Politics Quarterly 22 259 76 Google Scholar Sargan, J.D. 1958. The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables Econometrica 26 393 415 Google Scholar Shah, Dhavan, Mcleod, Jack, Yoon, So-Hyang 2001 Communication, context, and community Communication Research 28 464 506 Google Scholar
Solop, Frederic (2000). Digital democracy comes of age in Arizona.
Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference Tabachnick, Barbara, Fidell, Linda 1996Using Multivariate Statistics3 HarperCollins New York Google Scholar Tichenor, P.J., Donohue, G.A., Olien, C.N. 1965 Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge Public Opinion Quarterly 34 159 170 Google Scholar Tolbert, Caroline, McNeal, Ramona 2003 Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation? Political Research Quarterly 56 175 185 Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary (2003). CLARIFY: software for interpreting and presenting statistical results
Vavreck, Lynn, Spiliotes, Constantine, Fowler, Linda 2002 The effects of retail politics in the New Hampshire primary American Journal of Political Science 46 595 611 Google Scholar Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Brady, Henry E. 1995Voice and Equality Harvard University Press Cambridge Google Scholar Weber, Lori, Loumakis, Alysha, Bergman, James 2003 Who participates and why?: an analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public Social Science Computer Review 21 26 42 Google Scholar Wolf, Gary 2004 Weapons of mass mobilization Wired 12.09 1 8 Google Scholar Wolfinger, Raymond, Rosenstone, Steven 1980Who Votes? Yale University Press New Haven Google Scholar Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005