Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effects of a permanently elevated water table in an acid sulphate soil on reed canary grass for combustion

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims and background

Acid sulphate (AS) soils require careful management to prevent the environmental hazards that result from the oxidation of sulphide-bearing deep soil layers and the consequent acidification of soil and waters. Management with a high water table precludes many food crops, so their suitability for perennial energy cropping was investigated in a 3-year study using reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L., RCG).

Methods

Monolithic lysimeters made of undisturbed AS soil and equipped with ground-water level control and measurement instruments were planted with 1- year-old RCG turfs taken from a non-AS field. Two water tables were imposed, high (HWT, 20 cm below soil surface) and low (LWT, 70 cm below soil surface, considered normal for agriculturally managed AS soils) for a 3 year period. Growth and physiological characters of RCG were determined and its ash content and the elemental composition of its dry biomass (Ca, Cl, K, Mg, and S) were analysed.

Results

The level of the water table had significant effects on crop growth and quality. Shoots were 25 to 29 % taller, consequently yielding more dry matter in HWT than in LWT lysimeters. Concentrations of K, Mg and S that can affect the combustion process were higher in biomass harvested from LWT lysimeters than from the HWT plants. At the end of the experiment, the spatial distribution of roots within the soil profile differed between treatments. Roots penetrated to the bottom of LWT lysimeters with total root dry mass nearly twice that in HWT.

Conclusions

RCG intended for burning grows and performs well in acid sulphate soils managed with a raised water table. This management option minimizes the risk of acid flows from oxidized soils, and allows farmers to harvest a non-food crop from soils that would have to be drained to provide a food or feed crop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler PR, Del Grosso SJ, Parton WJ (2007) Life cycle assessment of net greenhouse gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. Ecol Appl 17:675–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andriesse W, van Mensvoort MEF (2002) Distribution and extend of acid sulphate soils. In: Lal R (ed) Encyclopedia of soil science. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Åström M, Sundström R, Holmberg M, Storberg K-E (2005) pH of streams in western Finland—a perspective from the Middle Ages into the mid 21st century. Agric Food Sci 14:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Åström M, Österholm P, Bärlund I, Tattari S (2007) Hydrochemical effects of surface liming, controlled drainage and lime-filter drainage on boreal acid sulfate soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 179:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolinder MA, Angers DA, Bélanger G, Michaud R, Laverdière MR (2002) Root biomass and shoot to root ratios of perennial forage crops in eastern. Can J Plant Sci 82:731–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bota J, Medrano H, Flexas J (2004) Is photosynthesis limited by decreased Rubisco activity and RuBP content under progressive water stress? New Phytol 162:671–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butler JL, Briske DD (1988) Population structure and tiller demography of the bunchgrass Schizachyrium scoparium in response to herbivory. Oikos 51:306–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell K (2007) A feasibility study guide for an agricultural biomass pellet company. Agricultural Utilization Research Institute (AURI) Ag Innovations

  • Clarke S, Preto F (2011) Biomass burn characteristics. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs. Retrieve from http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/11-033.pdf

  • Crutzen PJ, Andreae MO (1990) Biomass burning in the tropics: impact on atmospheric chemistry and biogeochemical cycles. Science 250:1669–1678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dent DL, Pons LJ (1995) A world perspective on acid sulphate soils. Geoderma 67:266–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworak T, Eppler U, Petersen JE, Schlegel S, Laaser C (2008) A review of the possible impact of biomass production from agriculture on water. Background paper for the conference “WFD meets CAP - Looking for a consistent approach”. A paper produced on behalf of the European Environment Agency. http://icm.eionet.europa.eu/ETC_Reports/Biomass_WFD_report_V7_final260108-2.pdf

  • EEA (2006) European Environment Agency: how much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment? EEA Report No 7/2006. Copenhagen: EEA. [http://reports.eea.europa.eu]

  • Elisa AA, Shamshuddin J, Fauziah CI, Roslan I (2012) Utilization of an acid sulphate soil in Malaysia for rice cultivation. In: Österholm P, Yli-Halla M, Eden P (eds) Geological survey of Finland, Guide 56, 2012. Proceedings of 7th International Acid Sulfate Soil Conference, Vaasa, Finland 2012. Towards Harmony between Land Use and the Environment. p. 34–36. http://arkisto.gtk.fi/op/op56/op_056.pdf

  • Epie KE (2010) Responses of reed canary grass to root zone flooding and drought. Master’s thesis, University of Helsinki. 43 pp

  • Fältmarsch R (2010) Biogeochemistry in acid sulphate soil landscapes and small urban centres in Western Finland. Ph.D thesis, Åbo Akademi University. 69 pp

  • Galatowitsch SM, Anderson NO, Ascher PD (1999) Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America. Wetlands 19:733–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale WJ, Cambardella CA (2000) Carbon dynamics of surface residue and root-derived organic matter under simulated no-till. Am J Soil Sci Soc 64:190–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilker RE, Weil RR, Krizek DT, Momen B (2002) Eastern gammagrass root penetration in adverse subsoil conditions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:931–938

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudd R, Kjellman R (2002) Bad matching between hatching and acidification: a pitfall for the burbot, Lota lota, off the river Kyrönjoki, Baltic Sea. Fish Res 55:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudd R, Leskelä A (1998) Acidification-induced species shifts in coastal fisheries off the river Kyrönjoki, Finland: a case study. Ambio 27:535–553

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (1997) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: revised 1996 Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: Workshop. Module 4: Agriculture. http://www.iea.org/ipcc/general/invs5c.htm

  • Jenkins BM, Baxter LL, Miles TR Jr, Miles TR (1998) Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Process Technol 54:17–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kallioinen A, Uusitalo J, Pahkala K, Kontturi M, Viikari L, Weymann NV, Siikaho M (2012) Reed canary grass feedstock for 2nd generation bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol 123:669–672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kercher SM, Zedler JB (2004) Flood tolerance in wetland angiosperms: a comparison of invasive and non-invasive species. Aquat Biol 80:89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komulainen M, Simi P, Hagelberg E, Ikonen I, Lyytinen S (2008) Reed energy- possibilities of using the common reed for energy generation in Southern Finland. Turku Univ Appl Sci Rep 67:81p

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski TT (1997) Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiol Monogram 1:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Krizek DT, Ritchie JC, Sadeghi AM, Foy CD, Rhoden EG, Davis JR Jr, Camp MJ (2003) A four-year study of biomass production of eastern gamagrass grown on an acid compact soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 34:457–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemus R, Lal R (2005) Bioenergy crops and carbon sequestration. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:1–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski I, Scurlock JMO, Lindvall E, Christou M (2003) The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass Bioenergy 25:335–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew EK, Panda RK, Nair M (2001) Influence of subsurface drainage on crop production and soil quality in a low lying acid sulphate soil. Agric Water Manag 47:191–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mediavilla V, Lehmann J, Meister E, Stunzi H, Serafin F (1995) Energiegras/Feldholz - Energiegrass, Jahresbericht. Bundesamt fur Energiewirtchaft, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkola HJ, Ahokas J (2009) Energy ratios in Finnish agricultural production. Agric Food Sci 18:332–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Monti A, Pritoni G, Venturi G (2004) Evaluation of 18 genotypes of switchgrass for energy destination in northern Italy. In: Van Swaaij WPM, Fjällström T, Helm P, Grassi A (Eds) Proceeding of the 2nd World Biomass Conference on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection. Rome. pp 240–243

  • Moore P, Attanandana T, Patrick W (1990) Factors affecting rice growth on acid sulfate soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1651–1656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Obernberger I, Thek G (2004) Physical characterisation and chemical composition of densified biomass fuels with regard to their combustion behaviour. Biomass Bioenergy 27:653–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paez A, Gonzalez ME (1995) Water stress and clipping management effects on guinea grass: II. Photosynthesis and water relations. Agron J 87:706–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahkala K, Pihala M (2000) Different plant parts as raw material for fuel and pulp production. Ind Crops Prod 11:119–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pahkala K, Aalto M, Isolahti M, Poikola J, Jauhiainen L (2008) Large-scale energy grass farming for power plants—a case study from Ostrobothnia, Finland. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1009–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastorek Z, Kára J, Jevič P (2004) Biomasa obnovitelný zdroj energie (Biomass – renewable source of energy). Prague, FCC PUBLIC: 288

  • Pezeshki SR (1993) Differences in patterns of photosynthetic responses to hypoxia in flood-tolerant and flood-sensitive tree species. Photosynthetica 28:423–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezeshki SR (2001) Wetland plant responses to soil flooding. Environ Exp Bot 46:299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezeshki SR, DeLaune RD, Kludze HK, Choi HS (1996) Photosynthetic and growth responses of cattail (Typha domingensis) and saw grass (Cladium jamaicense) to soil redox conditions. Aquat Bot 54:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qaderi MM, Kurepin LV, Reid DM (2006) Growth and physiological responses of canola (Brassica napus) to three components of global climate change: temperature, carbon dioxide and drought. Physiol Plant 128:710–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radiotis T, Li J, Goel K, Eisner R (1999) Fiber characteristics, pulpability and bleachability of switchgrass. Tappi J 82:100–105

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sahramaa M, Jauhiainen L (2003) Characterization of development and stem elongation of reed canary grass under northern conditions. Ind Crops Prod 18:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson MA, Adler PR, Boateng AA, Casler MD, Sarah G (2006) Switchgrasas as a biofuel feedstock in the USA. Can J Plant Sci 86:1315–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shurpali NJ, Hyvönen NP, Huttunen JT, Clement RJ, Reichstein M, Nykänen N, Biasi C, Martikainen PJ (2008) Cultivation of a perennial grass for bioenergy on a boreal organic soil—carbon sink or source? Glob Chang Biol 1:35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shurpali NJ, Hyvönen NP, Huttunen JT, Biasi C, Nykänen N, Pekkarinen N, Martikainen PJ (2009) Bare soil and reed canary grass ecosystem respiration in peat extraction sites in eastern Finland. Tellus 60:200–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simek M, Virtanen S, Kristufek V, Simojoki A, Yli-Halla M (2011) Evidence of rich microbial communities in the subsoil of a boreal acid sulphate soil conducive to greenhouse gas emissions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:113–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simojoki A, Virtanen S, Yli-Halla M (2012) Nitrous oxide emissions from acid sulphate soil at high and low ground water in a lysimeter experiment. In: Österholm P, Yli-Halla M, Eden P (eds) Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 56, 2012. Proceedings of 7th International Acid Sulfate Soil Conference, Vaasa, Finland 2012. Towards Harmony between Land Use and the Environment. pp 116–118. http://arkisto.gtk.fi/op/op56/op_056.pdf

  • Smith P (2004) Soils as carbon sinks: the global context. Soil Use Manag 20:212–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan LA (2012) Acid sulfate soils and their management. In: Österholm P, Yli-Halla M, Eden P (eds) Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 56, 2012. Proceedings of 7th International Acid Sulfate Soil Conference, Vaasa, Finland 2012. Towards Harmony between Land Use and the Environment. pp 127–129. http://arkisto.gtk.fi/op/op56/op_056.pdf

  • Tahir MHN, Casler MD, Moore KJ, Brummer EC (2011) Biomass yield and quality of reed canary grass under five harvest management systems for bioenergy production. Bioenergy Res 4:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TIKE (2012) Utilized agricultural area in 2012. Forecast 08.1.2012. www.matilda.fi

  • Vainio-Mattila B, Ginström T, Haaranen T, Luomanperä S, Lähdetie P, Oravuo M, Pietola K, Suojanen M, Virolainen J, Knuutila K, Ovaska S (2005) Future of crop production in Finland (in Finnish). 44 p., Report 2005:15, Ministry of Agriculture, Helsinki

  • Vapo (2007) Local fuels. Properties, classifications and environmental impacts. Vapo Energy. 3.9.2007

  • Virtanen S, Simojoki A, Yli-Halla M (2010) Monolithic lysimeters as tools to study the composition of pore and drainage waters responding to high water table in boreal acid sulphate soil. Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World. 1–6 August 2010, Brisbane, Australia

  • Virtanen S, Simojoki A, Knuutila O, Yli-Halla M (2013) Monolithic lysimeters as tools to investigate acid sulphate soil. Agric Water Manag 127:48–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward NJ, Sullivan LA, Bush RT (2004) The response of partially oxidised acid sulphate soil materials to anoxia. Aust J Soil Resour 42:514–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel PR, van der Valk AG (1998) Effects of nutrient and soil moisture on competition between Carex stricta, Phalaris arundinacea and Typha latifolia. Plant Ecol 138:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yli-Halla M, Puustinen M, Koskiaho J (1999) Area of cultivated acid sulfate soils in Finland. Soil Use Manag 15:62–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yli-Halla M, Mokma DL, Wilding LP, Drees LR (2008) Morphology, genesis and classification of acid sulphate soils of Finland. In: Lin C, Huang S, Li Y (eds) Proceedings of the joint conference of the 6th International Acid Sulfate Soil Conference and the Acid Rock Drainage Symposium. Guangdong Press Group, Guangzhou, pp 224–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X (2011) Seasonal responses of photosynthesis and growth of a bioenergy crop (Phalaris arundinacea L.) to climatic change under varying water regimes. Dissertationes Forestales 127. 35 pp. Available at: http://www.metla.fi/dissertations/df127.htm

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Academy of Finland grant 1124435, ‘Carbon-sequestering species mixtures for sustainable energy cropping’, and the Graduate School for Agricultural Production Sciences of the University of Helsinki. J. Fustec of ESA Angers, France and B. Deen of University of Guelph, Canada are greatly thanked for some useful suggestions. The authors extend appreciations to A. Lammi and M. Tykkyläinen for laboratory analyses and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenedy E. Epie.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Juan Barcelo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Epie, K.E., Virtanen, S., Santanen, A. et al. The effects of a permanently elevated water table in an acid sulphate soil on reed canary grass for combustion. Plant Soil 375, 149–158 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1925-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1925-4

Keywords

Navigation