Philosophical Studies

, Volume 161, Issue 1, pp 77–86

Lehrer and the consequence argument

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11098-012-9942-3

Cite this article as:
Šuster, D. Philos Stud (2012) 161: 77. doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9942-3
  • 96 Views

Abstract

The consequence argument of van Inwagen is widely regarded as the best argument for incompatibilism. Lewis’s response is praised by van Inwagen as the best compatibilist’s strategy but Lewis himself acknowledges that his strategy resembles that of Lehrer. A comparison will show that one can speak about Lehrer–Lewis strategy, although I think that Lewis’s variation is dialectically slightly stronger. The paper provides a response to some standard objections of incompatibilists to the Lehrer–Lewis reply.

Keywords

Consequence argumentLehrerLewisCompatibilismPower conditionalsExplanatory conditionals

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MariborMariborSlovenia