Women’s anger, epistemic personhood, and self-respect: an application of Lehrer’s work on self-trust
- Kristin Borgwald
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
I argue in this paper that the work of Keith Lehrer, especially in his book Self-Trust has applications to feminist ethics; specifically care ethics, which has become the leading form of normative sentimentalist ethics. I extend Lehrer’s ideas concerning reason and justification of belief beyond what he says by applying the notion of evaluation central to his account of acceptance to the need for evaluation of emotions. The inability to evaluate and attain justification of one’s emotions is an epistemic failure that leads one not to act on one’s own aspirations and desires and treat those desires as if they did not exist. I argue that this is a common condition among women in patriarchal societies because patriarchy can cause women to believe that they are not worthy of their trust concerning what they accept, specifically acceptance of their anger over their own mistreatment. As a result, many women are unable to realize the self-protective role of their anger. All of this reflects a lack of what I shall call epistemic personhood, a concept based on Lehrer’s theory concerning the keystone role of self-trust in the epistemic arch of rationality, justification and knowledge. Lastly, I use this concept of epistemic personhood to develop a care ethical account of self-respect that counters the Kantian account.
- Baron, M. (1985). Servility, critical deference and the deferential wife. Philosophical Studies, 45, 393–400. CrossRef
- Bartky, S. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.
- Cox, D. L., Stabb, S. D., & Bruckner, K. H. (1999). Women’s anger: Clinical and developmental perspectives. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.
- De Sousa, R. (1987). The rationality of emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Dillion, R. S. (1992). Towards a feminist conception of self-respect. Hypatia, 7(1), 52–69. CrossRef
- Friedman, M. A. (1985). Moral integrity and the deferential wife. Philosophical Studies, 47, 141–150. CrossRef
- Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Hill, T. E., Jr. (1973). Servility and self-respect. The Monist, 57, 87–104.
- Hill, T. E., Jr. (1982). Self-respect reconsidered. Tulane Studies in Philosophy, 31, 129–137.
- Lehrer, K. (1989). Thomas Reid. London: Routledge.
- Lehrer, K. (1997). Self-trust. Oxford: Clarendon Press. CrossRef
- Lehrer, K. (2011a). Self-trust and social truth. In A. Konzelmann Ziv, K. Lehrer, & B. Schmid (Eds.), Self-evaluation: Affective and social grounds of intentionality (pp. 119–134). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Lehrer, K. (2011b). Art, self and knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Lerner, H. G. (1986). The dance of anger: A woman’s guide to the changing patterns of intimate relationships. New York: Perennial Library.
- Nelson, H. L. (1996). Sophie doesn’t: Families and counterstories of self-trust. Hypatia, 11(1), 91–98. CrossRef
- Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Reid, T. (1788). Essays on the active powers of man. Edinburgh: Printed for John Bell and G.G.J. and J. Robinson, London.
- Slote, M. (2001). Morals from motives. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Slote, M. (2007). The ethics of care and empathy. London: Routledge.
- Women’s anger, epistemic personhood, and self-respect: an application of Lehrer’s work on self-trust
Volume 161, Issue 1 , pp 69-76
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Epistemic personhood
- Women’s anger
- Care ethics
- Kristin Borgwald (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA